Well, I submitted my voter's ballot today. I opted to not vote for any presidential candidate reflected on the ballot. I focused on the local candidates. Normally, when it comes to the presidential candidates, I just hold my nose and pick one that I consider the lesser of two evils. This time, they were both so crappy, I just had to skip them altogether.
once every four year...........what a waste no to vote for president
If it was a choice yes or no for
war, jobs, education, health care or security,
would you not vote?
I vote on a combination of the issues I consider important to me personally, as well as a candidate I perceive to have a fair measure of integrity. Neither presidential candidate has any integrity, thus I skipped them this time.
1. Hillary Clinton: Advocates for open borders, thus any crazy nut job or group of terrorists can waltz in. Plans on bringing in thousands and thousands of mostly Sunni Muslims. Both PEW research polls and Gallup Polls reflect that the majority of Muslims (Sunni and Shiite alike) want to live under Sharia Law. Sharia Law is completely incompatible with western society. The average family size of your typical Muslim family is 7.1 children per family, as opposed to your 2.8 children per family in the U.S.. Of the 100 mosques studied in the U.S., 75 advocate hardline anti-non-believer preachings. Women in any Muslim land are not the equal to men. Their testimony is worth half that of men's in court. The penalty for anyone leaving their religion, is prison and/or death, meaning that once Islam has it's grip on this nation, gays and lesbians would be imprisoned and/or killed. With Sunnis being the majority of Muslims coming into the U.S., it would most likely be death. Over several generations, with more and more Muslims entering into politics, the Constitution granting our freedoms would just be done away with and replace with that Sharia Law. I for one don't want my great-grandchildren or great-great grandchildren looking back and cursing us for allowing the growth and takeover by Muslims, thus causing them oppression, persecution and worse. Clinton is also anti-gun. I'm a believer in the Second Amendment and own firearms. I don't steal, rob, cause harm to or kill any humans. I'm strictly a sport user of them at the ranges, but I'll be damned if I would give them up to that gun grabbing *****.
2. Donald Trump: He's an egotistical, self-centered, blowhard, who is misogynistic and judges women's worth by their looks instead of their abilities. Because of his personality, he is extremely unpredictable and would probably make judgments based upon his whims, rarely relying on advisors. As to any tapes with him saying he has groped women in the past, I've heard equally crude things often being said by seamen (deck apes) and enginemen (snipes) when I served in the military and quite frankly, a good many of them couldn't complete a sentence without foul language sprinkled throughout them. So, while I can ignore his statements about women and any foul language, it's his unpredictability that concerns me, even though he might actually tackle the Muslim problem. One just has to look at Europe to see how not well that's going. A good example of a nation bringing in Muslims out of compassion and concern, one just has to look at Lebanon, once called the "Paris of the Middle-East." A thriving Christian nation that took pity on Palestinian Muslims and ended up in a civil war, with Hezbollah, pulling the strings now. I'm reminded of two quotes:
"If one does not learn from history, one is doomed to repeat it."
"If one does not understand his enemy, he will lose to him."
Do a thorough research of Islam's history, it's founder, it's goals and perhaps you too will not select Clinton and by virtue of Trump's unpredictability, also ignore him.