Zone1 Will this War Prepare the Way for the Rebuilding of the Temple?

The Romans crucified him.

think again ...

the Jews replied, “His blood is on us and on our children!”

they were not alone, is correct ... 4th century christianity are who stood by till those others gave their lives as jesus were no longer as well - to then write their own religion of servitude and denial in their names - than their own.

the repudiation of judaism buried from the historical event as the caretaker of the christian bible.
 
And that is especially true for the religion of militant atheism.
I suppose you could be right. Having never met a militant atheist, I wouldn't know. The definition of the word atheist precludes any religious connotation.
 
I suppose you could be right. Having never met a militant atheist, I wouldn't know. The definition of the word atheist precludes any religious connotation.
What does that have to do with militant atheism? Are you trying to suggest that militant atheism isn't a thing? Rather than you jerking off on whether it is logical for militant atheism to exist or not (which it isn't), why don't you look into it to see if it is a thing and what makes one a militant atheist?

If you have ever met anyone who condemns respect for people of faith, you have met a militant atheist. If you have ever met anyone who loved the principles of any militant atheistic communist regime (of which there have been more than a few), you have met a militant atheist.
 
What does that have to do with militant atheism? Are you trying to suggest that militant atheism isn't a thing? Rather than you jerking off on whether it is logical for militant atheism to exist or not (which it isn't), why don't you look into it to see if it is a thing and what makes one a militant atheist?

If you have ever met anyone who condemns respect for people of faith, you have met a militant atheist. If you have ever met anyone who loved the principles of any militant atheistic communist regime (of which there have been more than a few), you have met a militant atheist.
OK I get it now. Militant Atheiest is just another of your universal terms you use to describe things you either don't like or understand. Just another universal word like communist or socialist. I don't have any particular respect for people who believe in unicorns, and have been known to make an occasional joke about those that do believe in unicorns. Does that make me a militant anti-unicornist?
 
I don't know, but I think it is possible. These events may lead to the destruction of the Dome of the Rock and allow Israel to begin construction of the Third Temple where the Dome now stands

View attachment 855495


Everything seems to be falling into place.


why is this temple worth a war? is god not in texas?????
 
OK I get it now. Militant Atheiest is just another of your universal terms you use to describe things you either don't like or understand. Just another universal word like communist or socialist. I don't have any particular respect for people who believe in unicorns, and have been known to make an occasional joke about those that do believe in unicorns. Does that make me a militant anti-unicornist?
No. I didn't make up that term. Maybe try googling it.

This is pretty straightforward. If you condemn respect for people of faith for no other reason than they are people of faith, you meet the definition of militant atheism. You would basically be the Westboro Baptists of atheism. Now do you understand? Was that an example you could relate to?
 
Revelation 21:22

“And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.”

King James Version (KJV)
good quote.

either god is everywhere and needs no temple nor megachurch, or god is nowhere and needs no ..........
 
No. That is a very odd question.

would seem to qualify for a particular mind set ...

Every religion thinks they are better than everyone else.

perhaps those written as 10k page documents without substantiation, verification for any of their heavenly content - as being better represented to your comment might be a consideration.
 
good quote.

either god is everywhere and needs no temple nor megachurch, or god is nowhere and needs no ..........
Maybe look up the dialog between Nathan and God on David building God a temple. It's pretty clear from that God doesn't need man to build him a temple. Churches are for us.
 
That's pantheism.
that is Catholicism. ref baltimore catechism

16. What do we mean when that God Is all-present?
When we say that God is all-present we mean that He is everywhere.

Whither may I go from thy spirit, or whither may I flee from they face? (Psalm 138:7)
 
that is Catholicism. ref baltimore catechism

16. What do we mean when that God Is all-present?
When we say that God is all-present we mean that He is everywhere.
ding - it is also the belief of the founding diests, the free masons who write this constitution.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom