Will there be compromise now?

[Truthmatters]

Why do all you Obama supporters now want compromise? Don't you believe all the BS put forth by your Dear Leader? Heresy!

The dems have done nothing but to try and compromise, all the GOP thugs have done is stomped their feet and cry like 2 year olds because they won't touch a penny of their insane spending.

Such a ******* liar.

ah shes stomping and cryng like a two year old now

 

[LibertyLemming]

Why do you people want so much compromise? Don't you realize that almost every bill that is made into law reduces your freedom, costs money we are borrowing 40cents on the dollar, and is generally a bad ******* idea. I hate the duopoly but this is the purpose of it.

 

[Black_Label]

Why do you people want so much compromise? Don't you realize that almost every bill that is made into law reduces your freedom, costs money we are borrowing 40cents on the dollar, and is generally a bad ******* idea. I hate the duopoly but this is the purpose of it.

I agree I don't, but there is no choice without complete filibuster proof control of the dems to fully bring forth liberty.

Until then there is no choice but to take a shot in the foot to keep on pressing forward.

 

[LibertyLemming]

Why do you people want so much compromise? Don't you realize that almost every bill that is made into law reduces your freedom, costs money we are borrowing 40cents on the dollar, and is generally a bad ******* idea. I hate the duopoly but this is the purpose of it.

I agree I don't, but there is no choice without complete filibuster proof control of the dems to fully bring forth liberty.

Until then there is no choice but to take a shot in the foot to keep on pressing forward.

I hate to break it to you but no body with a D or an R next to their name has even the slightest interest in bringing forth liberty.

 

[2ndAmendment]

Ok democrats need to cut spending and the GOP needs to raise taxes. Only problem is the Grover Norquist pledge. Will the GOP stay true to America or Grover? Will the democrats cut those entitlements for the good of the country or sacrifice it all for the poor?

By compromise - do you mean when will I get fitted for my burka?

 

[Oddball]

Why do you people want so much compromise? Don't you realize that almost every bill that is made into law reduces your freedom, costs money we are borrowing 40cents on the dollar, and is generally a bad ******* idea. I hate the duopoly but this is the purpose of it.

I agree I don't, but there is no choice without complete filibuster proof control of the dems to fully bring forth liberty.

Until then there is no choice but to take a shot in the foot to keep on pressing forward.

I hate to break it to you but no body with a D or an R next to their name has even the slightest interest in bringing forth liberty.

To Crack_Baby, liberty is a fully charged EBT card and a fat ol' hunk of gubmint cheez.

 

[Black_Label]

I agree I don't, but there is no choice without complete filibuster proof control of the dems to fully bring forth liberty.

Until then there is no choice but to take a shot in the foot to keep on pressing forward.

I hate to break it to you but no body with a D or an R next to their name has even the slightest interest in bringing forth liberty.

To Crack_Baby, liberty is a fully charged EBT card and a fat ol' hunk of gubmint cheez.

To No balls, liberty is to dress up in his favorite pink tutu and suck dick on the corner to give to his "daddy" that promises to one day "trickle down" and make him rich

 

[Hum Dinger]

There are a lot more moderates in the new Republican caucus. They will compromise.

If the current congress will not compromise, then we will go over the fiscal cliff.

Two weeks over the cliff and the new Republican caucus will be Obama's *****.

No doubt about it!

 

[Cassandro]

The People have spoken: Let them eat their cake.

 

[Oddball]

There's no "fiscal cliff"...There's just the sequester that will force cuts that none of the welfare/warfare state drips in congress want to make.

 

[LibertyLemming]

I think we are more likely to suffer financial woes if there is compromise and the endless spending that Obama and the Democrats (and the Republicans just on different things) want to put into action.

 

[Photonic]

This thread is a perfect example of what's happening in our government. No compromise, and those who suggest it are put down. Then the side that put them down proudly claims that the problem isn't their fault because they tried to compromise.

Idiots.

 

[LibertyLemming]

I'm advocating for no compromise. Praying for it even.

 

[Oddball]

This thread is a perfect example of what's happening in our government. No compromise, And those who suggest it are put down. Then the side that put them down proudly claims that the problem isn't their fault because they tried to compromise.

Idiots.

Where was all this sacred "compromise" thingy when Obolshevikcare was being jammed up America's ass?

Hack fool.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Ok democrats need to cut spending and the GOP needs to raise taxes. Only problem is the Grover Norquist pledge. Will the GOP stay true to America or Grover? Will the democrats cut those entitlements for the good of the country or sacrifice it all for the poor?

With real GDP growth nudging 1.5% whatever compromise the D's and R's come up with will only have the effect of turning the fiscal cliff into a downward slope. Both tax increases and spending cuts will have the effect of slowing growth and making that slope steeper. The one and only solution to high unemployment, soaring deficits, etc. is raising the rate of growth of real GDP to 4% or higher.

Reagan inherited a stagnant economy and made bold moves to revive it that gave us the prosperity of the late 1980's and 1990's, but his policies carried with them risks both the Clinton and Bush43 administrations were slow to acknowledge and deal with. What we need today is a President who is bold enough to free up capital and inspire increased private investment in American industry and who is wise enough to manage to manage this reinvigorated economy better than Clinton or Bush43 did, perhaps Romney was that man, but what we have is a president whose every policy seems intended to make us more comfortable with a slowly failing economy rather than trying to turn it around.

Instead of proposing measures to that might help the economy recover, Obama proposes putting it on life support with more deficit funded "stimulus" spending. You can only see Obama's vision of hope and change as a good thing if the change you are hoping for is the decline of America.

 

[Hum Dinger]

There's no "fiscal cliff"...There's just the sequester that will force cuts that none of the welfare/warfare state drips in congress want to make.

Yes, we know that. It's been nicknamed "the fiscal cliff".

Did you think that everyone was talking about a cliff literally?

 

[Hum Dinger]

Ok democrats need to cut spending and the GOP needs to raise taxes. Only problem is the Grover Norquist pledge. Will the GOP stay true to America or Grover? Will the democrats cut those entitlements for the good of the country or sacrifice it all for the poor?

With real GDP growth nudging 1.5% whatever compromise the D's and R's come up with will only have the effect of turning the fiscal cliff into a downward slope. Both tax increases and spending cuts will have the effect of slowing growth and making that slope steeper. The one and only solution to high unemployment, soaring deficits, etc. is raising the rate of growth of real GDP to 4% or higher.

Reagan inherited a stagnant economy and made bold moves to revive it that gave us the prosperity of the late 1980's and 1990's, but his policies carried with them risks both the Clinton and Bush43 administrations were slow to acknowledge and deal with. What we need today is a President who is bold enough to free up capital and inspire increased private investment in American industry and who is wise enough to manage to manage this reinvigorated economy better than Clinton or Bush43 did, perhaps Romney was that man, but what we have is a president whose every policy seems intended to make us more comfortable with a slowly failing economy rather than trying to turn it around.

Instead of proposing measures to that might help the economy recover, Obama proposes putting it on life support with more deficit funded "stimulus" spending. You can only see Obama's vision of hope and change as a good thing if the change you are hoping for is the decline of America.

Reagan's strategy in the late 1980s was to balloon the deficit.

 

[Photonic]

This thread is a perfect example of what's happening in our government. No compromise, And those who suggest it are put down. Then the side that put them down proudly claims that the problem isn't their fault because they tried to compromise.

Idiots.

Where was all this sacred "compromise" thingy when Obolshevikcare was being jammed up America's ass?

Hack fool.

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[Oddball]

Reagan's strategy in the late 1980s was to balloon the deficit.

Total lie.

Tip O'Neil totally stiffed him on the spending cuts he wanted.

 

[Oddball]

This thread is a perfect example of what's happening in our government. No compromise, And those who suggest it are put down. Then the side that put them down proudly claims that the problem isn't their fault because they tried to compromise.

Idiots.

Where was all this sacred "compromise" thingy when Obolshevikcare was being jammed up America's ass?

Hack fool.

Thanks for proving my point.

The only point that was proven is that leftist hacks like you are only interested in "compromise", when it means that others abandon their principles to go along with the progressive/socialist program.

That's not compromise, it's immolation.