Will there be a Harris/trump debate?

Oh bullshit! Obama's economy was so weak for his entire two terms the Fed had to keep interest rates at near zero. Barry gave us "The Great Recession"! Then Trump came in and the Fed did 5 interest rate hikes before the pandemic because he had the economy booming! Covid allowed Democrats to shut down the economy and blame it all on Trump. That got us Joe Biden and the disaster that he's been for the economy!

There were 3 rates hikes in 2017, 4 hikes in 2018.
 
We get it you hate Obama.

Good for you.

That changes nothing.

Republicans gave us the Great Recession and Obama lead the way out… with Republicans kicking and screaming
History Contortionist ...eh ?
 
I was wondering how long before that went viral.
Where not that long ago it was everywhere in the news.
How San Fran Mayor had a clandestine relationship with a gal
half his age.That was Harris.Who also got a major league promotion
in the process.
Willie Brown managed two political appointments
to enhance Kamala Harris career in the aftermath of
exposing her extramarital affair with the Mayor and
California State Assembly Speaker half her age.
Not at all relevant.
I don't recall her ever raping anyone....so she's STILL got some moral superiority on convicted felon Trump.
 
Yes, they should have started hiking under Obama and a lot earlier under Biden.
Yep. Recessions come and go. Always have, always will. Once recovery establishes itself, gotta raise taxes and interest rates back up, to be ready for the next one.
 
We get it you hate Obama.

Good for you.

That changes nothing.

Republicans gave us the Great Recession and Obama lead the way out… with Republicans kicking and screaming
The reason it's called The Great Recession was that it lasted for most of Barry's two terms, Lesh! Some leadership!
 
The reason it's called The Great Recession was that it lasted for most of Barry's two terms, Lesh! Some leadership!
The reason it was called the Great Recession was because it was so deep.

It ended in 2009 stupid
 
The reason it's called The Great Recession was that it lasted for most of Barry's two terms, Lesh! Some leadership!
Good grief

When is the last time you made a post that wasn't completely, factually incorrect?

For your sake, I hope you're a sock troll putting on an act.
 

Trumpworld Howls Over The Switch From Biden To Harris


Within hours of President Joe Biden withdrawing from the presidential race and endorsing Kamala Harris to run in his stead, Donald Trump had a response: It was all very unfair.

It’s his classic MO, leaning wantonly into personal grievance when nothing else will do. Biden, Trump suggested, was lying about having COVID. The Republican Party, he said, should “be reimbursed for fraud” because it had been so grossly misled.

And, Trump added, he would no longer agree to the terms of the next debate. He’d rather it be held on friendly turf – Fox News – effectively signaling that he’s dropping out of the next debate as currently scheduled.


My debate with Crooked Joe Biden, the Worst President in the history of the United States, was slated to be broadcast on Fake News ABC, the home of George Slopadopolus, sometime in September. Now that Joe has, not surprisingly, has quit the race, I think the Debate, with whomever the Radical Left Democrats choose, should be held on FoxNews, rather than very biased ABC. Thank you! DJT

Faux is not biased? Or is this a way to back out of debating Harris? Maybe he doesn't want to be on stage with a woman after he was found liable for sexual assault (rape in many states) for finger ******* Carroll against her will. Or because his party wants to force women to carry a fetus to term against their will.



The Dem/ Socialist politburo hasn't yet announced that their minions will be rewarded with Cackling Harris as their designated candidate. As we saw, the politburo will give and taketh away anyone it chooses for the Dem / Socialist minions.
 

Trumpworld Howls Over The Switch From Biden To Harris


Within hours of President Joe Biden withdrawing from the presidential race and endorsing Kamala Harris to run in his stead, Donald Trump had a response: It was all very unfair.

It’s his classic MO, leaning wantonly into personal grievance when nothing else will do. Biden, Trump suggested, was lying about having COVID. The Republican Party, he said, should “be reimbursed for fraud” because it had been so grossly misled.

And, Trump added, he would no longer agree to the terms of the next debate. He’d rather it be held on friendly turf – Fox News – effectively signaling that he’s dropping out of the next debate as currently scheduled.


My debate with Crooked Joe Biden, the Worst President in the history of the United States, was slated to be broadcast on Fake News ABC, the home of George Slopadopolus, sometime in September. Now that Joe has, not surprisingly, has quit the race, I think the Debate, with whomever the Radical Left Democrats choose, should be held on FoxNews, rather than very biased ABC. Thank you! DJT

Faux is not biased? Or is this a way to back out of debating Harris? Maybe he doesn't want to be on stage with a woman after he was found liable for sexual assault (rape in many states) for finger ******* Carroll against her will. Or because his party wants to force women to carry a fetus to term against their will.


Harris has no votes saying she’s the nominee. From anyone.

If she is voted in, then Trump will debate her and the next day Democrats will be screaming WHEN DID SHE GET SO STUPID WE NEED TO REPLACE HER.

Just like the gullible Left did with Joe.
 
15th post
The USS Trump fired a broadside into Joe Biden and blasted him clean out of the race. He's reloading for Kamala. :muahaha:

470px-BB61_USS_Iowa_BB61_broadside_USN.jpg
 
Trump bullied NATO deadbeats into paying their commitments and was thanked for it. All democrats have are lies.

Secretary General thanks President Trump for his commitment to NATO​


Kind of funny really. Everyone knows that Trump has a ego the size of the universe. This comment was almost certainly designed to massage Trump's ego, more than anything else.

You post one comment from the Secretary General and you ignore all the other facts. It's a typical Trump supporter view on things.

If it's convenient for my argument, here it is. If it's not, then we'll ignore it.

Trump started attacking NATO in 2016. Two years after they agreed to increase spending within 10 years. Your article is from 2019.

In 2014 there were three countries who met the 2% of GDP for defense spending.

In 2016 when Trump said his comments there were 5 countries. That dropped to 4 the next year, rose to 6 the year after. By 2020 it had reached 9. You could say Trump had an impact, or you could say countries had decided in 2014 to increase defense spending year on year and it reached that point by 2020. But then Trump disappeared. By 2023 it had risen to 10 countries and 2024 to 23 countries.
Funny how the biggest rise happened 10 years after they agreed to increase spending to 2% after 10 years.

I think that says it all really. Trump blows his trumpet and makes comments he knows nothing about. Probably didn't even know NATO members had already agreed, or he found out and then decided to make it his own thing. An easy win when your supporters are ignorant as hell.

The increase happens in spite of what he says, he takes the glory, because that's what Trump does. He's the sort of guy who will take credit when he's done NOTHING.

Look at Syria. Trump declared victory over ISIS, but the US hardly did anything.




"We have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump Presidency."

But the Russians outspent, out bombed, out fought the US 10-1 at the very least. The US barely had troops in Syria


"The number of troops has grown gradually. Although the official limit on U.S. troops has remained at 503 since shortly before President Barack Obama left office, the actual number is now believed to be more than 1,500, including special forces, a Marine artillery unit, forward air controllers and others."

You don't win a war with 1,500 troops.

"Turnout figures in voting from abroad in the September 2016 parliamentary election indicated the number of Russian military personnel in Syria at the time was about 4,300. The Russian presence has likely increased, as Moscow this year deployed its military police to patrol so-called “de-escalation zones” in Syria."

Russia had way more, and Wagner might have been in there too.
 
Back
Top Bottom