Look who’s suddenly against transparency!
Mueller is not trustworthy. It will simply be a he-said piece of "strongly likely" without proof for madcow to read excerpts on a loop.
An equal rebuttal is required. Marked up line by line. If it takes two more years.
A Political Dem hit peice should not be allowed.
Evidence has proven Mueller has both manipulated and withheld evidence in the past to send innocent people to jail AND hid evidence of Russian intimidation, bribery, and extortion in 2014.
-- His credibility, honor, and integrity are justifiably in question.
Evidence shows the FBI has a history of intentionally misleading FISA courts to acquire illegal warrants. Mueller himself had to explain at least 75 incidents when he was Director of the FBI.
-- That is 75 serious violations of people's Constitutional Rights.
The US IG exposed the FBI criminally altered witness testimony AFTER it had been given, demonstrated a level of bias by charging people connected to Trump with Lying to the FBI while refusing to indict people connected to Hillary for the same crime.
ALL of that already means the FBI are compromised - nothing has changed, at least until the Firing of Comey and McCabe (who should have both been Perp-walked by now: Perjury, Leaking Classified, Obstruction, Seditious Conspiracy...)
Mueller's report will NOT recommend indictment of the President because there was never any crime perpetrated by the President - no evidence of a crime - warranting an investigation let alone the appointment of a (co-conspiratorial) Special Counsel.
Mueller's report will be an attempt to justify the last 2 1/2 years of the exposed attempted coup and will be an attack on the President.
Mueller will point to the indictment of people associated with the President and argue if they were proven guilty then Trump had to be guilty, LOOKED dirty, despite being unable to show any evidence that false accusation is true.
Were I a member of the a Senate committee, no matter what he reports - either way - I would demand Mueller appear before Congress and answer these questions:
- Why were you collaborating with Ohr (DOJ) & Steele, a Trump-hating foreign spy, on the Russian-authored Dossier BEFORE an investigation had begun and BEFORE you were appointed Special Counsel, as Ohr testified under oath?
- Ohr testified before Congress and stated he told EVERONE connected with the Trump investigation that Steele was a biased Trump-Hater and that his report was UN-reliable...why did you and the FBI still put so much stock into it, why was it such a cornerstone of your investigation?
- Having been called before the FISA Court to answer for 75 illegal incidents of lying to the FISA Court when you were the Director of the FBI, why did it take a seperate investigation held by the US IG to find out in / under YOUR investigation that the FBI and DOJ's Rod Rosenstein did the same thing - broke laws during their investigation of the President and his associates? Why didn't YOU discover this? Or did you? If you did, why did you not pursue it / investigate?
- Why has illegal / inappropriate collusion, Quid Pro Quo, and crimes committed by the DOJ, NSA, CIA, and FBI come out ONLY as a result of PUBLIC FOIA requests and the US IG's reports and NOT by your investigation?
- Why were the crimes not pursued?
Would you recommend a Special Counsel be appointed to investigate the FBI, all of their crimes exposed, especially their attempted coup d'etat against the President? If not, why in the hell not?
- During your investigation evidence was exposed proving Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, and Cheryl Mills committed crimes and were protected from the consequences of those crimes by the FBI...and YOUR investigation - why didn't you and your team identify these, investigate these?
- Why was Hillary Clinton not investigated for working with and Paying foreign spies and Russians in 2016, as evidence shows she did, in an attempt to alter the outcome of the election?
- In investigating Russian collusion / interference, why did you not investigate when it began - in 2014?
Barak Obama and his administration were informed in 2014 of Russian hacking, counter Intel programs, and paying violent liberal groups to spread racial division and violence.
WHY would an investigator not start at the beginning where a crime began and only start in the middle?
- Why should the US a Senate not recommend YOU be investigated / indicted when YOU broke the law by violating ... refusing to comply with Congressional subpoenas?
Mueller has a shitty rep, history, and performance record, especially the last 2+ years. He has a lot to answer for himself...
As such, his report is already tainted before it ever comes out.
