Their answer will be a little harsher than a Russia's tomato embargo from Turkey, after the Turks shot down a Russian military jet.if Russia sinks a British intruder - will it be Russian aggression for NATO?
though, it's a rethoric question, I doubt that NATO countries will go farer than expressing condemnation even if Russia nukes London
generally, it looks like the US is more a 3d World country than the 2nd one..
The Black Sea is international waters. British ships have as much right to be there as Russian ones do.I get inspiration here, do you mind it?
better answer the question, instead of flooding..
Think the US will sink Russia if Russia sinks a brit ship.
I heard that pitchholes are common in American roads, anscient infrastructure causes blackouts, mobile internet is slow or absent at all and you have no idea what electronic government is...
let alone military budget gets stolen so nothing sails/flies properly or at all, all new weapons tests fail and your military are a danger for civilians, your military ships collide with civilian ships due to poor training of staff etc...
generally, it looks like the US is more a 3d World country than the 2nd one..
oh, and inflation accelerates, debt to GDP ratio is worse then the one of Mozambique, budget deficite is more than 50%, trade deficite is enormouse, especially with China and both the US and most citizens are bankrupts if interest rate grows to level of 5%...
you have no idea of Russia, starting from its internet and telecom giants toour public debt (17% of GDP) and yours (128%? 138%? - I don't remember exact figures)...
Seriously, what is this bizarre propaganda?
Go peddle your bizarre lies to someone else. Not interested.please tell me, which channel do you trust and which one lies?
CNN
Fox
I don't know. Send a letter to Ukrainian Genshtab.be more specific, please. Will they send 2 more Ukrainian boats to be sunk?
What on Earth inflation of 6.8% has to do with bankruptcy of banks and financial system as a whole? Has it ever occurred in your messy brains that 'cheap' money benefit the banks in the first turn?
It is hard to extract sense from this word salad, but okay. First of all, where did you get the idea that business would become unprofitable and would lose its ability to pay credits? Basically, inflation helps businesses to raise their revenues nominally. Do you get this, or should I explain why?lol, Esay, if you want to be publicly lectured on basics of economy - let it be so.
banking system's function is to redistribute capital to where it is needed and the most effective.
it is done via profit. if a business creates profit it has access to credit, if it is ineffective it is cut from credit and goes bankrupt.
in present USA inflation is higher than interest rate (and my reply above was referring to a specific example of fixed mortgage which is lower than inflation, and it makes banks to lose money) .
it means that banks lose capital on every credit given to business, to everybody actually.
it means not only that banking system has no sourse of income except deeply flawed QE, distribution of printed money which is not backed with goods and what inevitably leads to absolutely lethal hyperinflation,
but it also means that all enterprises, both effective and ineffective get credit and survive.
banking system does not function properly or at all, capitalism is dead in the US, as much as dead is US economy, it is on constant life support of QE
also, due to this absence of purifying bankruptcies, when ineffective enerprises survive because they easily get credit and pay smaller % than even inflation is - disproportions in economy grow.
ineffective enerprises consume resourses without creating added value and share of ineffective enterprises constantly grow
this is the reason why Chinese export to the US permanently grows, because US economy is inefficient and is instantly a bankrupt as soon as QE is stopped and interest rate grows to the level it belongs with inflation of 6,8% - to 9-10% approximately.
US is a bankrupt, the EU is not much in better condition
you chose wrong horse, Esay, all your hopes and Eurodreams are in vain...
Ukrainians are idiots..
They aren't sending troops.......some countries have sent token troops......they will simply do the economic sanctions again and try to kill the rubble again.as we remember, Britts are very persistent in their military provocations against Russia, they send troops to Ukraine when it is getting ready for invasion in Donbass (with >500 000 Russian citizens) , last summer British military ship "Defender" violated Russian naval border in Crimea.
Then Russians preferred not to sink it, but next such intrusion may be met with force and British ship will be sunk.
Russia would be glad to have some training with new hypersonic Kinzhal missiles it has.
What will the UK do?
What will NATO do?
Except providing new targets?
