Will More Democrats or More Republicans be outed by Release of the Epstein Files? Let's keep count!

[SaxonJackson]

As I see the daily stories about the release of these files, a single question comes to my mind: What does this have to do with the role of Congress and/or the President of the United States? Is this state business? Is it related to legislation? Does the Federal government have any role whatsoever in enforcing Florida's or NewYork's laws? Is it more important than solving the riddle of exploding healthcare costs and their impact on the exalted, "hard working Americans"?

What the **** are they doing in Washington, and why?

Anybody have an answer?

My biggest concern is why both Biden & Trump allowed the pedos on the list to get away with their crimes for so long. In Trump's case, why did he promise to release the files during his campaign (one of the reasons I voted for him); then tell everyone that it was a "boring" story; then tell everyone that it was a "hoax"; then tell his base that sought justice for the victims that they were "weaklings"; then tell them that he "no longer needed their support; then come out and tell everyone that he has nothing to hide; and is ready release the files? What the hell was THAT all about? Why go full circle when he could have simply released the files on day one like he promised?

Can we expect the files to be cleansed or altered in some way? I doubt that we'll ever know.

 

[Natural Citizen]

He's closet middling superior TDS Stain going after Israel.

Speaking of Israel, since you brought the specific nation up, do you share the President of the United States, Donald Trump's, open contention to the American people that Israel, a foreign nation, should ''rightfully'' hold power over the American congress?

And do you equally share in President Donald Trump's utter disbelief tht Israel, a foreign nation, would ever lose any of that power over the American congress that their unregistered foreign agents have acquired for them from within, either by hook or by crook?

A simple yes or no will suffice...

For reference...

Think it through all the way before you provide your yes or no, dear patriot. Assuming you have the Intellectual capacity to reason the logic in the question. Or the courage for that matter...

 

[Billiejeens]

Speaking of Israel, since you brought the specific nation up, do you share the President of the United States, Donald Trump's, open contention to the American people that Israel, a foreign nation, should ''rightfully'' hold power over the American congress?

And do you equally share in President Donald Trump's utter disbelief tht Israel, a foreign nation, would ever lose any of that acquired power over the American congress, either by hook or by crook?

A simple yes or no will suffice...

For reference...


View attachment 1185439

Think it through all the way before you provide your yes or no, dear patriot. Assuming you have the Intellectual capacity to reason the logic in the question. Or the courage for that matter...

Seven (7) seconds
No, that's not dishonest, at all.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Seven (7) seconds
No, that's not dishonest, at all.

The words are the words. And they speak for themselves alone.

There is no context that could in any way whatsoever justify those specific words ever being spoken by an American president.

Not yesterday. Not today. Not tomorrow.

Not any day.


And if you believe there is, then you're clearly one of the so-called ''die hards''...

 

[leftwinger]

Speaking of Israel, since you brought the specific nation up, do you share the President of the United States, Donald Trump's, open contention to the American people that Israel, a foreign nation, should ''rightfully'' hold power over the American congress?

And do you equally share in President Donald Trump's utter disbelief tht Israel, a foreign nation, would ever lose any of that power over the American congress that their unregistered foreign agents have acquired for them from within, either by hook or by crook?

A simple yes or no will suffice...

For reference...


View attachment 1185439

Think it through all the way before you provide your yes or no, dear patriot. Assuming you have the Intellectual capacity to reason the logic in the question. Or the courage for that matter...

Sounds odd? Nice 7SEC clip taken "out of context"? Means nothing to me, no effect. Never hear, never heard anything about this.

 

[Blaster]

Too many innocent victims will be exposed against their wishes.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Sounds odd? Nice 7SEC clip taken "out of context"? Means nothing to me, no effect. Never hear, never heard anything about this.

Yeah, that's probably because you're historically another one of these folks, observably...

 

[Natural Citizen]

Well heck. I just got 500 trophy points. Must be my lucky day.

Alright, blips. Have a good rest of the day stroking each other off. I've got stuff to do...

 

[Rawley]

TDSers don't care

 

[Seymour Flops]

There is no context that could in any way whatsoever justify those specific words ever being spoken by an American president.

Not yesterday. Not today. Not tomorrow.

Not any day.

If that were true, then of course you would have included the context, and not just seven seconds.

 

[Hafar1014]

Speaking of Israel, since you brought the specific nation up, do you share the President of the United States, Donald Trump's, open contention to the American people that Israel, a foreign nation, should ''rightfully'' hold power over the American congress?

And do you equally share in President Donald Trump's utter disbelief tht Israel, a foreign nation, would ever lose any of that power over the American congress that their unregistered foreign agents have acquired for them from within, either by hook or by crook?

A simple yes or no will suffice...

For reference...


View attachment 1185439

Think it through all the way before you provide your yes or no, dear patriot. Assuming you have the Intellectual capacity to reason the logic in the question. Or the courage for that matter...

Here we go again Jews control the world. The truth is we are simply smarter than you

 

[Natural Citizen]

If that were true, then of course you would have included the context, and not just seven seconds.

If you believe that there is any...any context whatsoever...which would justify an President of the United States openly contending to the American people in that a foreign nation should ''rightfully''...I'll say it again...''rightfully'' hold power over the American congress, then lets hear it.

Show us your wisdom, dear patriot. This oughtta be real hoot.

We'll wait.

In the opinion of this American that is treason of the highest regard.

 

[Seymour Flops]

If you believe that there is any...any context whatsoever...which would justify an President of the United States openly contending to the American people in that a foreign nation should ''rightfully''...I'll say it again...''rightfully'' hold power over the American congress, then lets hear it.

Show us your wisdom, dear patriot. This oughtta be real hoot.

View attachment 1185469

We'll wait.

In the opinion of this American that is treason of the highest regard.

Instead of asking me to invent a context, why not be honest and present the actual context?

Do you post on another forum on which the posters are dumb enough to fall for the truncated and out of context quote trick?

At least it is a change of pace from the dishonest paraphrase trick.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Instead of asking me to invent a context, why not be honest and present the actual context?

Do you post on another forum on which the posters are dumb enough to fall for the truncated and out of context quote trick?

At least it is a change of pace from the dishonest paraphrase trick.

Let me educate you on something, you stupid asshole. Since you don't seem to understand how checks and balances work...for starters, since there's no place I know of that it is written that a foreign nation has any rightful power whatsoever, to serve as a check or a balance over any branch of our Republic, and that's wihout even touching on the whole of the traditional American philosophy of governance.

There's no context whatsoever...none...in which justification can be made for the open contention by an President of the United States that a foreign nation should ''rightfully'' hold power of the American congress. Again...not yesterday, not today, not tomorrow...not any day.

You're another one of these folks, apparently...

 

[Natural Citizen]

Again, I ask. What kind of American are you?

 

[citygator]

Already deflecting from Trump. lol. His plan is to flood the news with everything so his supporters can cling to some finance dude none of us know trying to deflect that we elected Epstein’s partner in crime.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Let me educate you on something, you stupid asshole.

LoL!
You're like a ten year old. Bad words don't make you a big boy.

Since you don't seem to understand how checks and balances work...for starters, since there's no place I know of that it is written that a foreign nation has any rightful power whatsoever, to serve as a check or a balance over any branch of our Republic, and that's wihout even touching on the whole of the traditional American philosophy of governance.

There's no context whatsoever...none...in which justification can be made for the open contention by an President of the United States that a foreign nation should ''rightfully hold power of the American congress. Again...not yesterday, not today, not tomorrow...not any day.

So . . . do you know the context or not?

Because either you are being dishonest and deliberately hiding the context and getting angry over being called on it, or whover posted that seven seconds was being dishonest and you fell for it.

There is no third possibility.

None.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Trump asked congress to vote to release the Epstein files. Four hundred seventy one out of four hundred and seventy two obeyed, without question.

Israel has power over congress? I think not.

 

[Muhammed]

Most recent: Larry Summers, Harvard professor, surprise, surprise. Note, I do not say "former Harvard professor." Why would Harvard get rid of such a fine human being?

Larry Summers said Monday night that he was “deeply ashamed” about his relationship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, telling CNN that he would pause all public engagements as he works to “rebuild trust and repair relationships” — but the Harvard University professor added that he will continue teaching as some call for the university to sever ties with him.

New details of Summers’ relationship with Epstein emerged last week when a House committee released emails showing years of personal correspondence between the two men, including Summers making sexist comments and seeking Epstein’s romantic advice.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/17/politics/elizabeth-warren-larry-summers-harvard-epstein

In the hundreds of messages released, Summers also appeared to place trust in Epstein and confided to him about his pursuit of a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee.

Larry Summers steps back from public roles after House release of Epstein correspondence

Larry Summers steps back from public roles after House committee releases seven years of messages between the former Harvard president and Jeffrey Epstein.

www.foxnews.com

"Mentee." There is a nonce that grates on my nerves.

Anyone here wish their daughter could go to Harvard and learn from this man?

Keep posting and keep it civil, please! I expect people from both parties to be named in the files. Let's not make it a contest.

So far these are the Democrat "faves" Christine Pelosi was talking about. Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, Jay Pritzker and Larry Summers were all implicated by the victims.

So far the Republicans are still at 0.

So it's a 5 - 0 Democrat lead.

 

[konradv]

Most recent: Larry Summers, Harvard professor, surprise, surprise. Note, I do not say "former Harvard professor." Why would Harvard get rid of such a fine human being?

Larry Summers said Monday night that he was “deeply ashamed” about his relationship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, telling CNN that he would pause all public engagements as he works to “rebuild trust and repair relationships” — but the Harvard University professor added that he will continue teaching as some call for the university to sever ties with him.

New details of Summers’ relationship with Epstein emerged last week when a House committee released emails showing years of personal correspondence between the two men, including Summers making sexist comments and seeking Epstein’s romantic advice.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/17/politics/elizabeth-warren-larry-summers-harvard-epstein

In the hundreds of messages released, Summers also appeared to place trust in Epstein and confided to him about his pursuit of a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee.

Larry Summers steps back from public roles after House release of Epstein correspondence

Larry Summers steps back from public roles after House committee releases seven years of messages between the former Harvard president and Jeffrey Epstein.

www.foxnews.com

"Mentee." There is a nonce that grates on my nerves.

Anyone here wish their daughter could go to Harvard and learn from this man?

Keep posting and keep it civil, please! I expect people from both parties to be named in the files. Let's not make it a contest.

If Trump is controlling the release, I don’t trust it.