Nope, he had a blacklist of conservatives to silence.
Really? Then prove it. Where is this imaginary list, liar!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope, he had a blacklist of conservatives to silence.
Much hostility about not being able to see dick pics on Twitter. Truly a scandal at having to go to Fox to see your Hunter Biden pics.
Really? Then prove it. Where is this imaginary list, liar!
In the 2018 hearing.I get the desperation of you fascists.
Dorsey lied directly to Congress - under oath. Dorsey, when asked point blank if Twitter shadow bans people, he testified under oath they did not.
Direct perjury.
The only question now, is Dorsey subject to the same laws you've used against enemies of your Reich?
Frankly if they put Dorsey up against a wall I wouldn't care. I just like the freakout you're doing because you couldn't get dick picks on Twitter. You think Twitter dick pics would suddenly make 7mm people vote for Trump?Much trolling in desperation to distract from the fact that Jack Dorsey lied to congress.
Because we ALL know the fix is in, and his status in the Reich means he's not subject to the laws you brutally used against enemies of your Reich.
Now run along and do whatever it is you do with your dick pics.
If you try to post them here, I will report you.
Twitter Files two dropped last night, and along with it the proof of the blacklists used by Twitter to silence conservative voices in order to influence elections, specifically the 2020 presidential election.
{Following the second installment of the "Twitter Files" that revealed the platform's efforts to suppress prominent conservatives, a resurfaced September 2018 clip of Dorsey's testimony to a congressional committee was asked point-blank whether Twitter "censors" its users. }
Twitter Files flashback: Jack Dorsey testified under oath Twitter does not censor, 'shadow-ban' conservatives
2018 testimony of former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey claiming Twitter does not censor or shadow-ban users went viral following the latest batch of "Twitter Files" shared by Bari Weiss.www.foxnews.com
Dorsey lied under oath to Congress, we now know.
Conservative gadfly Roger Stone was accused of lying to Congress, and the FBI coordinated with CNN to create a media spectacular - with helicopter gun ships, nearly a hundred Gestapo commandos in full military body armor, armed with machine guns, Zodiac attack landing craft - all to arrest a 64 year old for a white collar process crime.
So will we see the same regarding Dorsey?
Same "crime." Will Garland execute a major military assault on Jack Dorsey's house? Or does Dorsey have the right politics, and is above the law?
The NY POST, the Press, was not censored....they wrote the article and sold their paper to whomever wanted to buy it or get their distribution thru their subscriptions.Frankly if they put Dorsey up against a wall I wouldn't care. I just like the freakout you're doing because you couldn't get dick picks on Twitter. You think Twitter dick pics would suddenly make 7mm people vote for Trump?
You REALLY are sick in the head. Seek some help immediately!Frankly if they put Dorsey up against a wall I wouldn't care. I just like the freakout you're doing because you couldn't get dick picks on Twitter. You think Twitter dick pics would suddenly make 7mm people vote for Trump?
You are a tool.LOL
Fucking retard
LOL
Fucking retard
You're right to be scared - this is the biggest scandal in 200 years.
This exposes the deep corruption that has infected this nation.
I don’t see what the big deal is. That’s what Fox News has been doing since the 90s.Well, now that we know that private mega corporations are working politically for the intent of swaying and influencing elections both by suppressing bad news about you or good news about the opponent, but in effect the creation and dissemination of MISinformation as a result in order to effect political outcome.
And they actually are a tool the rightwing Government uses and used to push their lies.I don’t see what the big deal is. That’s what Fox News has been doing since the 90s.
what does that have to do with LYING?Twitter was not obligated to put the Trump Campaign October Surprise, the Giuliani/NYpost article on their site even if they were certain it was proven not to be Russian propaganda....
Frankly if they put Dorsey up against a wall I wouldn't care. I just like the freakout you're doing because you couldn't get dick picks on Twitter. You think Twitter dick pics would suddenly make 7mm people vote for Trump?
Yes, they are finally found out.First, if I wanted dick pics, no one has a larger collection than you.
But I do find the difference in law quite interesting - impossible to deny that fascists simply aren't subject to the laws prosecuted against Americans.
The NY POST, the Press, was not censored....
they wrote the article and sold their paper to whomever wanted to buy it or get their distribution thru their subscriptions.
No government first amendment rights for the Press, were broken. And no laws were broken by Twitter choosing not to put the Post article or naked pics on their site. Twitter is not the Press, with constitutional protection from Congress censoring them....but the NYPOST, although a tabloid, is the press....and they were not stopped from writing or printing the Hunter Biden laptop story.
I don't understand why that is so hard for rightwingers to understand??
Yeah, libfucks are really good at that kind of abuse.If you redefine words, you can accuse anyone of lying.