Will Conservative Patriots Back Down From Their Running Over Protestors Bills?

[Godboy]

Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

Your silliness aside, if protesters want to be safe from being hit by vehicles, DON'T SURROUND THE VEHICLES. See how simple the solution to public safety can be? Oh... and seriously consider not standing in the interstate, assuming high-speed traffic gives a damn about your snowflake issue of the day.

The right to not be stopped on your way to Denny's overrides someone else's right to life.

Your right to protest doesnt include stopping vehicles in the streets. It sure as FUCK doesnt mean you can attack cars or the people inside of them, which we have seen happen thousands of times.

 

[Godboy]

so, is there a need for a new law for the situation that you describe?

Yes.

Brown Shirts assault motorists all the time. If a motorist does the right thing and runs the assaulters down, the motorist is prosecuted. Motorists mush have legal protection from the terrorist troops of the democrat party.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article245730735.html

Driver charged in fatal hit-and-run at Seattle Black Lives Matter protest

A 27-year-old man arrested on suspicion of barreling into a Black Lives Matter protest on a closed Seattle freeway was charged Wednesday with vehicular homicide.

abcnews.go.com

yeah, those protestors sure assaulted the vehicle.

guess what, turd: if you intentionally kill people, you have to face consequences.

If you illegally block traffic, you have to face consequences.

 

[Uncensored2008]

flee mob scenes, like stepanek in iowa city, or alex fields, eh?

 

[L.K.Eder]

so, is there a need for a new law for the situation that you describe?

Yes.

Brown Shirts assault motorists all the time. If a motorist does the right thing and runs the assaulters down, the motorist is prosecuted. Motorists mush have legal protection from the terrorist troops of the democrat party.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article245730735.html

Driver charged in fatal hit-and-run at Seattle Black Lives Matter protest

A 27-year-old man arrested on suspicion of barreling into a Black Lives Matter protest on a closed Seattle freeway was charged Wednesday with vehicular homicide.

abcnews.go.com

yeah, those protestors sure assaulted the vehicle.

guess what, turd: if you intentionally kill people, you have to face consequences.

If you illegally block traffic, you have to face consequences.

agreed. but they will not involve murder, manslaughter and the likes.

 

[Flash]

When the law was presented in Florida Sheriff Grady Judd of Polk County put up a picture of peaceful protesters and a picture of rioting and destruction.

He said "we know the difference".

Only stupid confused Moon Bats don't know the difference.

If filthy ass hate filled BLM protesters try to block my vehicle and present as threat to me or my family I sure as hell will run over them and not think twice about it.

 

[Godboy]

Backlash over GOP bills to shield drivers who hit protesters

Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic. Fairly or not, they're facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the...

apnews.com

"Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic - they’re facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the world. The driver immunity proposals have been labeled “hit and kill” bills that undermine free assembly and embolden extremists by suggesting they have a free pass to drive through protesters; by the American Civil Liberties Union.

A North Carolina state senator said Monday there are no plans to advance the measure in that chamber. In Tennessee, a committee rejected the bill. In Florida, Sen. George Gainer said the intent of his now-failed bill was to protect only those motorists who unintentionally strike protesters blocking traffic. He denounced “the reprehensible actions of the evil person in Virginia.”

The evil person the Florida Senator was referring to was the guy who ran over protestors in Charlottesville -- as if this guy didn't have a right to run them over...he feared for this safety....Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

Well he wouldn't have been convicted if he had this alleged right to run people over because he was scared.

False....unless you think the people who wrote this bill are lying when they said the guy in Charlottesville was evil and should have been convicted for murder

You seem to believe evil people like him would be shielded by this bill; thus giving other evil people an excuse to do what he did...which is PRECISELY the argument that is being made by folks like the ACLU....

Which is why proponents of the bill have to keep trying to convince us that the bill doesn't do that....


"Bill supporters have rejected that claim and denounced the Charlottesville attack. They note that the wording of their bills would not protect drivers who deliberately target protesters, and any intentional attackers would still face criminal and civil liability."

So why do you think this guy in Charlottesville would protected?

Ohhh look, Buff_Knobpolisher is lying again.

This has nothing to do with deliberate and premeditated acts such as the Charlottesville attack.

These bill protect motorists who are attacked by the BLM klan and ANTIFA Brownshirts.

The attackers were black and the victims were white, so you already know Biff doesnt give a fuck.

 

[Godboy]

so, is there a need for a new law for the situation that you describe?

Yes.

Brown Shirts assault motorists all the time. If a motorist does the right thing and runs the assaulters down, the motorist is prosecuted. Motorists mush have legal protection from the terrorist troops of the democrat party.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article245730735.html

Driver charged in fatal hit-and-run at Seattle Black Lives Matter protest

A 27-year-old man arrested on suspicion of barreling into a Black Lives Matter protest on a closed Seattle freeway was charged Wednesday with vehicular homicide.

abcnews.go.com

yeah, those protestors sure assaulted the vehicle.

guess what, turd: if you intentionally kill people, you have to face consequences.

If you illegally block traffic, you have to face consequences.

agreed. but they will not involve murder, manslaughter and the likes.

They will when they attack people, which has happened countless times in the past year alone. You lefties murdered 30 civilians at your protests last year and 20 cops. THOUSANDS of people had severe injuries. You ruined lives.

 

[Mac-7]

I'm going to hit the gas, and if I plow over someone that was standing on my hood, I couldn't give a fuck less.

The trick is to slow down but never stop

If you slowly roll forward and a protester gets run over its not your fault because you truck was not going too fast to avoid

Legally you still have to a avoid injuring others IF POSSIBLE

 

[L.K.Eder]

flee mob scenes, like stepanek in iowa city, or alex fields, eh?

guess, what? don't run over protestors. always a good way to go through life. no new laws needed for that situation.

but you are a student of the anis-amri-school of driving, where you can plough through anyone you don't like. and now you want a law that let's you get away with it.

 

[L.K.Eder]

so, is there a need for a new law for the situation that you describe?

Yes.

Brown Shirts assault motorists all the time. If a motorist does the right thing and runs the assaulters down, the motorist is prosecuted. Motorists mush have legal protection from the terrorist troops of the democrat party.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article245730735.html

Driver charged in fatal hit-and-run at Seattle Black Lives Matter protest

A 27-year-old man arrested on suspicion of barreling into a Black Lives Matter protest on a closed Seattle freeway was charged Wednesday with vehicular homicide.

abcnews.go.com

yeah, those protestors sure assaulted the vehicle.

guess what, turd: if you intentionally kill people, you have to face consequences.

If you illegally block traffic, you have to face consequences.

agreed. but they will not involve murder, manslaughter and the likes.

They will when they attack people, which has happened countless times in the past year alone. You lefties murdered 30 civilians at your protests last year and 20 cops. THOUSANDS of people had severe injuries. You ruined lives.

so, no new laws needed, right?

and keep your drama to yourself, boy. i murdered no one, and i have ruined no life.

 

[Muhammed]

flee mob scenes, like stepanek in iowa city, or alex fields, eh?

guess, what? don't run over protestors. always a good way to go through life. no new laws needed for that situation.

but you are a student of the anis-amri-school of driving, where you can plough through anyone you don't like. and now you want a law that let's you get away with it.

They can protest on the sidewalk, stupid moonbat.

 

[L.K.Eder]

flee mob scenes, like stepanek in iowa city, or alex fields, eh?

guess, what? don't run over protestors. always a good way to go through life. no new laws needed for that situation.

but you are a student of the anis-amri-school of driving, where you can plough through anyone you don't like. and now you want a law that let's you get away with it.

They can protest on the sidewalk, stupid moonbat.

thx for your input, hero. it is always welcome to highlight your lack of reason.

 

[MisterBeale]

Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

Your silliness aside, if protesters want to be safe from being hit by vehicles, DON'T SURROUND THE VEHICLES. See how simple the solution to public safety can be? Oh... and seriously consider not standing in the interstate, assuming high-speed traffic gives a damn about your snowflake issue of the day.

The right to not be stopped on your way to Denny's overrides someone else's right to life.

Stop being an idiot.

Of course you are right. . . unless that person is purposely TRYING TO STOP the others from peacefully going about their business, going to Denny's etc.

What if it is an Ambulance on the way to the hospital, or someone just trying to take their pregnant wife to the ER?

Use your damn head.

Protesters have no right to impede or interrupt the peaceful business of others. . . . They have no idea what others are doing, and it really might be make or break, life or death scenario's to others.

 

[White 6]

Backlash over GOP bills to shield drivers who hit protesters

Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic. Fairly or not, they're facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the...

apnews.com

"Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic - they’re facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the world. The driver immunity proposals have been labeled “hit and kill” bills that undermine free assembly and embolden extremists by suggesting they have a free pass to drive through protesters; by the American Civil Liberties Union.

A North Carolina state senator said Monday there are no plans to advance the measure in that chamber. In Tennessee, a committee rejected the bill. In Florida, Sen. George Gainer said the intent of his now-failed bill was to protect only those motorists who unintentionally strike protesters blocking traffic. He denounced “the reprehensible actions of the evil person in Virginia.”

The evil person the Florida Senator was referring to was the guy who ran over protestors in Charlottesville -- as if this guy didn't have a right to run them over...he feared for this safety....Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

I live in Tennessee and would never run over a pedestrian if I could avoid it, but if I make a wrong turn and become surrounded with protestors attacking my stopped car, I would protect myself, my wife and anybody else in my vehicle under attack, with the vehicle itself, if necessary. There should be no penalty for protecting yourself from the violence of others.
I recommend having a dash cam to support your claim of being under attack, or you will be at the mercy of the protestors word against yours.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Backlash over GOP bills to shield drivers who hit protesters

Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic. Fairly or not, they're facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the...

apnews.com

"Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic - they’re facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the world. The driver immunity proposals have been labeled “hit and kill” bills that undermine free assembly and embolden extremists by suggesting they have a free pass to drive through protesters; by the American Civil Liberties Union.

A North Carolina state senator said Monday there are no plans to advance the measure in that chamber. In Tennessee, a committee rejected the bill. In Florida, Sen. George Gainer said the intent of his now-failed bill was to protect only those motorists who unintentionally strike protesters blocking traffic. He denounced “the reprehensible actions of the evil person in Virginia.”

The evil person the Florida Senator was referring to was the guy who ran over protestors in Charlottesville -- as if this guy didn't have a right to run them over...he feared for this safety....Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

I live in Tennessee and would never run over a pedestrian if I could avoid it, but if I make a wrong turn and become surrounded with protestors attacking my stopped car, I would protect myself, my wife and anybody else in my vehicle under attack, with the vehicle itself, if necessary. There should be no penalty for protecting yourself from the violence of others.

problem is...this fantasy scenario you keep conjuring up rarely happens....instead you have folks (like on this very post) try to justify REAL LIFE SCENARIOS like this one...

And these "protests" can go both ways....because what is little talked about from the Charlottesville fiasco is the black kid who was ganged up on and attacked by white supremacists...would he have been cleared of assault charges if he ran them over instead??

He would have been justified to do so wouldn't he?

Black man beaten at Charlottesville rally 'cleared of assault'

DeAndre Harris was reportedly cleared of assault charges related to the incident in which he was beaten.

www.bbc.com

 

[White 6]

Backlash over GOP bills to shield drivers who hit protesters

Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic. Fairly or not, they're facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the...

apnews.com

"Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic - they’re facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the world. The driver immunity proposals have been labeled “hit and kill” bills that undermine free assembly and embolden extremists by suggesting they have a free pass to drive through protesters; by the American Civil Liberties Union.

A North Carolina state senator said Monday there are no plans to advance the measure in that chamber. In Tennessee, a committee rejected the bill. In Florida, Sen. George Gainer said the intent of his now-failed bill was to protect only those motorists who unintentionally strike protesters blocking traffic. He denounced “the reprehensible actions of the evil person in Virginia.”

The evil person the Florida Senator was referring to was the guy who ran over protestors in Charlottesville -- as if this guy didn't have a right to run them over...he feared for this safety....Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

I live in Tennessee and would never run over a pedestrian if I could avoid it, but if I make a wrong turn and become surrounded with protestors attacking my stopped car, I would protect myself, my wife and anybody else in my vehicle under attack, with the vehicle itself, if necessary. There should be no penalty for protecting yourself from the violence of others.

problem is...this fantasy scenario you keep conjuring up rarely happens....instead you have folks (like on this very post) try to justify REAL LIFE SCENARIOS like this one...
View attachment 501294


And these "protests" can go both ways....because what is little talked about from the Charlottesville fiasco is the black kid who was ganged up on and attacked by white supremacists...would he have been cleared of assault charges if he ran them over instead??

He would have been justified to do so wouldn't he?

Black man beaten at Charlottesville rally 'cleared of assault'

DeAndre Harris was reportedly cleared of assault charges related to the incident in which he was beaten.

www.bbc.com

That's fine. People that hit protesting pedestrians on purpose when not doing it for personal defense deserve to be under the jail. I just want to be protected from physical protestor mob attacks on me, my vehicle and occupants. If I see a protest up ahead, I am perfectly willing to go the other way. I do not seek a right, even to intentionally ease through their little protest. I got time to go around and let the authorities sort it out. That said, my standing as an innocent under attack in this state is paramount. It is a "stand your ground" state. If your idea of protest is to stop vehicle in the roadway, threaten and attack them, thinking the vehicle occupant have no right to self defense, you got the wrong state. Go protest and launch your attack where they think it is your right to physically attack people as part of a "peaceful" protest. Tennessee is probably not the state for you.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Backlash over GOP bills to shield drivers who hit protesters

Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic. Fairly or not, they're facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the...

apnews.com

"Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic - they’re facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the world. The driver immunity proposals have been labeled “hit and kill” bills that undermine free assembly and embolden extremists by suggesting they have a free pass to drive through protesters; by the American Civil Liberties Union.

A North Carolina state senator said Monday there are no plans to advance the measure in that chamber. In Tennessee, a committee rejected the bill. In Florida, Sen. George Gainer said the intent of his now-failed bill was to protect only those motorists who unintentionally strike protesters blocking traffic. He denounced “the reprehensible actions of the evil person in Virginia.”

The evil person the Florida Senator was referring to was the guy who ran over protestors in Charlottesville -- as if this guy didn't have a right to run them over...he feared for this safety....Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

I live in Tennessee and would never run over a pedestrian if I could avoid it, but if I make a wrong turn and become surrounded with protestors attacking my stopped car, I would protect myself, my wife and anybody else in my vehicle under attack, with the vehicle itself, if necessary. There should be no penalty for protecting yourself from the violence of others.

problem is...this fantasy scenario you keep conjuring up rarely happens....instead you have folks (like on this very post) try to justify REAL LIFE SCENARIOS like this one...
View attachment 501294


And these "protests" can go both ways....because what is little talked about from the Charlottesville fiasco is the black kid who was ganged up on and attacked by white supremacists...would he have been cleared of assault charges if he ran them over instead??

He would have been justified to do so wouldn't he?

Black man beaten at Charlottesville rally 'cleared of assault'

DeAndre Harris was reportedly cleared of assault charges related to the incident in which he was beaten.

www.bbc.com

That's fine. People that hit protesting pedestrians on purpose when not doing it for personal defense deserve to be under the jail. I just want to be protected from physical protestor mob attacks on me, my vehicle and occupants. If I see a protest up ahead, I am perfectly willing to go the other way. I do not seek a right, even to intentionally ease through their little protest. I got time to go around and let the authorities sort it out. That said, my standing as an innocent under attack in this state is paramount. It is a "stand your ground" state. If your idea of protest is to stop vehicle in the roadway, threaten and attack them, thinking the vehicle occupant have no right to self defense, you got the wrong state. Go protest and launch your attack where they think it is your right to physically attack people as part of a "peaceful" protest. Tennessee is probably not the state for you.

Yup......those people on the Edmund Pettus bridge should have been run over....

But the good thing about successful protests is........people who were opposed to it in the beginning can pretend they supported the goals of those protests....AFTER THE FACT....

 

[Turtlesoup]

Backlash over GOP bills to shield drivers who hit protesters

Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic. Fairly or not, they're facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the...

apnews.com

"Republican lawmakers in six states have pushed this year for legal protections for motorists who hit protesters blocking traffic - they’re facing an intense backlash now that violent images of a car ramming into a crowd protesting a white supremacist rally have been seen around the world. The driver immunity proposals have been labeled “hit and kill” bills that undermine free assembly and embolden extremists by suggesting they have a free pass to drive through protesters; by the American Civil Liberties Union.

A North Carolina state senator said Monday there are no plans to advance the measure in that chamber. In Tennessee, a committee rejected the bill. In Florida, Sen. George Gainer said the intent of his now-failed bill was to protect only those motorists who unintentionally strike protesters blocking traffic. He denounced “the reprehensible actions of the evil person in Virginia.”

The evil person the Florida Senator was referring to was the guy who ran over protestors in Charlottesville -- as if this guy didn't have a right to run them over...he feared for this safety....Some of these republican legislatures are starting to show weakness and not pushing hard enough to pass these bills...they are showing a reluctance to stand up for the call that "All Lives Splatter" .

Protestors rioters surrounding cars beating drivers--robbing them doesn't bother at you all does it. I drive a SUV...if you block me in, I will fear for my life and have to run you over regardless of your skiin color or what you are protesting.

 

[Godboy]

so, is there a need for a new law for the situation that you describe?

Yes.

Brown Shirts assault motorists all the time. If a motorist does the right thing and runs the assaulters down, the motorist is prosecuted. Motorists mush have legal protection from the terrorist troops of the democrat party.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article245730735.html

Driver charged in fatal hit-and-run at Seattle Black Lives Matter protest

A 27-year-old man arrested on suspicion of barreling into a Black Lives Matter protest on a closed Seattle freeway was charged Wednesday with vehicular homicide.

abcnews.go.com

yeah, those protestors sure assaulted the vehicle.

guess what, turd: if you intentionally kill people, you have to face consequences.

If you illegally block traffic, you have to face consequences.

agreed. but they will not involve murder, manslaughter and the likes.

No one was murdered?

 

[Godboy]

so, is there a need for a new law for the situation that you describe?

Yes.

Brown Shirts assault motorists all the time. If a motorist does the right thing and runs the assaulters down, the motorist is prosecuted. Motorists mush have legal protection from the terrorist troops of the democrat party.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article245730735.html

Driver charged in fatal hit-and-run at Seattle Black Lives Matter protest

A 27-year-old man arrested on suspicion of barreling into a Black Lives Matter protest on a closed Seattle freeway was charged Wednesday with vehicular homicide.

abcnews.go.com

yeah, those protestors sure assaulted the vehicle.

guess what, turd: if you intentionally kill people, you have to face consequences.

If you illegally block traffic, you have to face consequences.

agreed. but they will not involve murder, manslaughter and the likes.

They will when they attack people, which has happened countless times in the past year alone. You lefties murdered 30 civilians at your protests last year and 20 cops. THOUSANDS of people had severe injuries. You ruined lives.

so, no new laws needed, right?

and keep your drama to yourself, boy. i murdered no one, and i have ruined no life.

No, you just defend the rights of violent mobs who do murder people, while doing everything you can to fuck over the innocent people who get stuck in your dangerous democrat riots.