Contumacious
Radical Freedom
Published on Aug 9, 2016
.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Published on Aug 9, 2016
.
.
He literally says "We don't comment on who our sources are." So this is a lie.
None of which changes the fact that you lied about what Assange said, nor do I think he cares what you think WikiLeaks's policy on their sources should be.He literally says "We don't comment on who our sources are." So this is a lie.
He virtually identified Seth Rich. I believe that if the contributor is dead thar he should identify the individual outright.
None of which changes the fact that you lied about what Assange said, nor do I think he cares what you think WikiLeaks's policy on their sources should be.He literally says "We don't comment on who our sources are." So this is a lie.
He virtually identified Seth Rich. I believe that if the contributor is dead thar he should identify the individual outright.
How would it favor Trump even if it weren't a complete fabrication on your part?None of which changes the fact that you lied about what Assange said, nor do I think he cares what you think WikiLeaks's policy on their sources should be.He literally says "We don't comment on who our sources are." So this is a lie.
He virtually identified Seth Rich. I believe that if the contributor is dead thar he should identify the individual outright.
I understand that anything that favors DJT irritates you.
Deal with it.
He identified Seth the best way he could under the circumstances.
Only a dumb fuck like yourself can pretend not to know who he was talking about.