Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When obamaturd reveals his secrets and the source for his campaign monies, then willard can.Willard's own father said it best "Only one year could be a fluke, perhaps done for show"
Willard's father presented 12 years of tax returns to show transparency to the american people.
Obama also has done so for 12 years.
Why won't Willard?
When obamaturd reveals his secrets and the source for his campaign monies, then willard can.Willard's own father said it best "Only one year could be a fluke, perhaps done for show"
Willard's father presented 12 years of tax returns to show transparency to the american people.
Obama also has done so for 12 years.
Why won't Willard?
Still waiting. The 300 million from the 08 campaign, the source. His college records. Know why? Because he is embarrassed about his less then stellar grades.When obamaturd reveals his secrets and the source for his campaign monies, then willard can.Willard's own father said it best "Only one year could be a fluke, perhaps done for show"
Willard's father presented 12 years of tax returns to show transparency to the american people.
Obama also has done so for 12 years.
Why won't Willard?
Here it is
OpenSecrets.org: Money in Politics -- See Who's Giving & Who's Getting
Papers time Willard!
I dont need to know anything about his taxes................ If I did it would be law.
Here it isWhen obamaturd reveals his secrets and the source for his campaign monies, then willard can.Willard's own father said it best "Only one year could be a fluke, perhaps done for show"
Willard's father presented 12 years of tax returns to show transparency to the american people.
Obama also has done so for 12 years.
Why won't Willard?
OpenSecrets.org: Money in Politics -- See Who's Giving & Who's Getting
Papers time Willard!
Here it isWhen obamaturd reveals his secrets and the source for his campaign monies, then willard can.
OpenSecrets.org: Money in Politics -- See Who's Giving & Who's Getting
Papers time Willard!
The next response will be: "uh did I say campaign funds...uh...I meant birth certificate....err...they have that too? Oh I meant college records!"
No matter what Obama gives them they'll demand mor while defending Mitt to not give anything. Next they ask for the placenta of Obamas mother, or proof he's not from krypton.
Here it is
OpenSecrets.org: Money in Politics -- See Who's Giving & Who's Getting
Papers time Willard!
The next response will be: "uh did I say campaign funds...uh...I meant birth certificate....err...they have that too? Oh I meant college records!"
No matter what Obama gives them they'll demand mor while defending Mitt to not give anything. Next they ask for the placenta of Obamas mother, or proof he's not from krypton.
Dont like the goal posts moved on ya...liberals do it all the time....whhaaaaaaaaa
What law requires him to give 2 years of tax returns to the public? Got a link to this law?Willard's own father said it best "Only one year could be a fluke, perhaps done for show"
Willard's father presented 12 years of tax returns to show transparency to the american people.
Obama also has done so for 12 years.
Why won't Willard?
By law, Romney only has to provide the last two years of his tax returns.
Romney is within the law and within his rights.
Obama even though he has preached transparency in his Presidency has consistently gone to great lengths to hide his documentation.
Not time to play the little liberals' reindeer games.. it is time to focus on the issues at hand... if this were against LAW, the liberals might have a leg to stand on.. it is not, and they do not
the Obama campaign will keep flinging poo, hoping something sticks, and harp on it like there is no tomorrow to get Romney off focus... for they cannot run on their own record
Not time to play the little liberals' reindeer games.. it is time to focus on the issues at hand... if this were against LAW, the liberals might have a leg to stand on.. it is not, and they do not
the Obama campaign will keep flinging poo, hoping something sticks, and harp on it like there is no tomorrow to get Romney off focus... for they cannot run on their own record
Politics is not about the law
Not time to play the little liberals' reindeer games.. it is time to focus on the issues at hand... if this were against LAW, the liberals might have a leg to stand on.. it is not, and they do not
the Obama campaign will keep flinging poo, hoping something sticks, and harp on it like there is no tomorrow to get Romney off focus... for they cannot run on their own record
Politics is not about the law
Didn't say it was.. as a matter of fact I made a pretty clear statement about poo flinging.. which is all this kind of politics is.... hoping something sticks in the press, is a good enough distraction, and keep doing it til something else sticks
As I said.. don't play these reindeer games... it really does not matter because the ones that will keep harping on this are ones who will not vote for Romney no matter what... there is really nothing to gain... and all it does is change focus and wastes time
Politics is not about the law
Didn't say it was.. as a matter of fact I made a pretty clear statement about poo flinging.. which is all this kind of politics is.... hoping something sticks in the press, is a good enough distraction, and keep doing it til something else sticks
As I said.. don't play these reindeer games... it really does not matter because the ones that will keep harping on this are ones who will not vote for Romney no matter what... there is really nothing to gain... and all it does is change focus and wastes time
Well, I guess you have to justify supporting less information some how. You and I know that Dems made the charge against Romney. Romney refuses to release previous records and that looks shady. Everyone knows that.
Romney could just ignore it and people with a brain will say "Maybe theres something to this" and decide Romney isnt trust worthy.
Also, Romney could release the previous tax returns and people with a brain will say "Dam...The dems were lying about that?" and decide that the Dems arent trust worthy. I.E. Obama's Birth Certificate
To pretend that the questions that continue to come from all sides should be ignored because it doesnt matter is fallacy. Whether you admit it or not....It is.
Didn't say it was.. as a matter of fact I made a pretty clear statement about poo flinging.. which is all this kind of politics is.... hoping something sticks in the press, is a good enough distraction, and keep doing it til something else sticks
As I said.. don't play these reindeer games... it really does not matter because the ones that will keep harping on this are ones who will not vote for Romney no matter what... there is really nothing to gain... and all it does is change focus and wastes time
Well, I guess you have to justify supporting less information some how. You and I know that Dems made the charge against Romney. Romney refuses to release previous records and that looks shady. Everyone knows that.
Romney could just ignore it and people with a brain will say "Maybe theres something to this" and decide Romney isnt trust worthy.
Also, Romney could release the previous tax returns and people with a brain will say "Dam...The dems were lying about that?" and decide that the Dems arent trust worthy. I.E. Obama's Birth Certificate
To pretend that the questions that continue to come from all sides should be ignored because it doesnt matter is fallacy. Whether you admit it or not....It is.
It looks shady?? Why?? The IRS has investigated him? There is any hint of impropriety beyond one 'anonymous' source claimed by a despicable politician?? The history of releasing personal information about taxes is what? You know how many McCain put out? Reagan??
Do you not see that this is pure distraction and poo flinging meant to put the focus on material that can only advance class warfare??
Now... if you want to talk about FULL VETTING, make a standard and put it ALL out there. Every public and/or private piece of history. Tax returns, employment reviews, medical history, educational history, police reports, EVERYTHING.... But no, this is SPECIFICALLY targeted to the flavor of the moment attack based on class warfare....
Either have a law of full vetting, or don't..
Personally I don't give a shit about tax returns, or college papers, or if the person sought counseling for emotional issues with divorce, or if they had a cancerous mole removed, or if they own 14 pieces of property in 5 different countries, or whatever along those lines...
The Romney campaign says he has released as many returns as candidate John Kerry did in 2004, and cites Teresa Heinz Kerrys refusal to release any of her tax returns. Neither is an apt comparison. John Kerry actually released returns from 1999 through 2003, and also released tax returns during his Senate runs. As for Teresa Heinz, Romney isnt the wealthy spouse of a candidate, but the candidate himself. In 2008, John McCain released two years of returns, but he had been filling out financial disclosure forms for decades as a senator. Romney protests that he is not legally obliged to release any tax returns. Of course not. He is no longer in the realm of the private sector, though, where he can comply with the letter of the law with the Securities and Exchange Commission and leave it at that. Perceptions matter.
Romney may feel impatience with requirements that the political culture imposes on a presidential candidate that he feels are pointless (and inconvenient). But hes a politician running for the highest office in the land, and his current posture is probably unsustainable. In all likelihood, he wont be able to maintain a position that looks secretive and is a departure from campaign conventions. The only question is whether he releases more returns now, or later after playing more defense on the issue and sustaining more hits. There will surely be a press feeding frenzy over new returns, but better to weather it in the middle of July.
If he releases more returns, Romney will be in a better position to resist the inevitable demands for even more disclosures. More important, he will be in a better position to pivot his campaign to what should be its focus telling a story, through a series of detailed, substantive speeches, about where he wants to take the country.
Well, I guess you have to justify supporting less information some how. You and I know that Dems made the charge against Romney. Romney refuses to release previous records and that looks shady. Everyone knows that.
Romney could just ignore it and people with a brain will say "Maybe theres something to this" and decide Romney isnt trust worthy.
Also, Romney could release the previous tax returns and people with a brain will say "Dam...The dems were lying about that?" and decide that the Dems arent trust worthy. I.E. Obama's Birth Certificate
To pretend that the questions that continue to come from all sides should be ignored because it doesnt matter is fallacy. Whether you admit it or not....It is.
It looks shady?? Why?? The IRS has investigated him? There is any hint of impropriety beyond one 'anonymous' source claimed by a despicable politician?? The history of releasing personal information about taxes is what? You know how many McCain put out? Reagan??
Do you not see that this is pure distraction and poo flinging meant to put the focus on material that can only advance class warfare??
Now... if you want to talk about FULL VETTING, make a standard and put it ALL out there. Every public and/or private piece of history. Tax returns, employment reviews, medical history, educational history, police reports, EVERYTHING.... But no, this is SPECIFICALLY targeted to the flavor of the moment attack based on class warfare....
Either have a law of full vetting, or don't..
Personally I don't give a shit about tax returns, or college papers, or if the person sought counseling for emotional issues with divorce, or if they had a cancerous mole removed, or if they own 14 pieces of property in 5 different countries, or whatever along those lines...
Why does it look shady? Because people have asked for it from both sides and he refuses. That's why it looks shady....You know that. There isnt a standard to put it "all out there" whatever that means...but there is a standard that even Mitt father stood behind...Mitt cant demonize his daddy...and people from both sides have encouraged him to release it. You cant make this about Harry Reid when the support for him releasing has come from both sides....Mitt cant demonize both sides.
You can pretend that it doesnt look bad, or that people dont care...but you have to play that game with yourself because no one else believes that. Independents wont believe that and whether you "care" or not has nothing to do with how it looks....and it doesnt look good.
Here is how Thinkprogress put it:
The Romney campaign says he has released as many returns as candidate John Kerry did in 2004, and cites Teresa Heinz Kerrys refusal to release any of her tax returns. Neither is an apt comparison. John Kerry actually released returns from 1999 through 2003, and also released tax returns during his Senate runs. As for Teresa Heinz, Romney isnt the wealthy spouse of a candidate, but the candidate himself. In 2008, John McCain released two years of returns, but he had been filling out financial disclosure forms for decades as a senator. Romney protests that he is not legally obliged to release any tax returns. Of course not. He is no longer in the realm of the private sector, though, where he can comply with the letter of the law with the Securities and Exchange Commission and leave it at that. Perceptions matter.
Romney may feel impatience with requirements that the political culture imposes on a presidential candidate that he feels are pointless (and inconvenient). But hes a politician running for the highest office in the land, and his current posture is probably unsustainable. In all likelihood, he wont be able to maintain a position that looks secretive and is a departure from campaign conventions. The only question is whether he releases more returns now, or later after playing more defense on the issue and sustaining more hits. There will surely be a press feeding frenzy over new returns, but better to weather it in the middle of July.
If he releases more returns, Romney will be in a better position to resist the inevitable demands for even more disclosures. More important, he will be in a better position to pivot his campaign to what should be its focus telling a story, through a series of detailed, substantive speeches, about where he wants to take the country.
You can argue about how perceptions dont matter..or whatever...but you know, like I know...it matters
...it IS distraction and nothing more than poo flinging
...it IS distraction and nothing more than poo flinging
Kinda like blatantly lying about the Obama camp's suit against Ohio, right?
...it IS distraction and nothing more than poo flinging
Kinda like blatantly lying about the Obama camp's suit against Ohio, right?
I did not read much of anything on it...
But yeah, the rabid wingers on the right do the same thing.. big example, the birthers
Does not excuse the actions nor give a free pass to volley back in the same way
