Breitbart uses sensational emotionally loaded language in their headlines such as
“Obama Loses 2 Million+ Followers During Twitter Fake Account Purge.”
Are you claiming the story isn't fact, comrade?
You grasp the irony of Obama being hardest hit by the purge of trolls, right?
They utilize sources such as tabloid entertainment magazine Variety, and
credible sources such as
Bloomberg. as well as factually mixed sources such as the
Daily Mail. Under the Big Hollywood section they publish tabloid stories such as
“Fashion Notes: Melania Trump is Posh and Proper for Final Day in England” utilizing fashion sources such as farfetch.com
And?
The NY Times uses the exact same sources and has a fashion section.
What point are you attempting, Herr Himmler?
OH MY ALLAH, Breitbart uses sources instead of just making shit up the way CNN does..
Seriously Comrade, what did the hate site you lifted this from think they were saying?
In general, the majority of published stories favor the right and are highly
pro-Trump in tone and story selection.
So?
You have every other source advocating for the left and rabidly anti-Trum/ anti-American.
A
factual search reveals numerous failed fact checks by
IFCN Fact Checkers. Here are just a few of many as an example:
Leftist fact checkers tend to lie. I don't know this latest group but Snopes and Politifraud are notorious for their myriad partisan lies.
And you go right to the notorious lying fucks at Snopes. Snopes is on the level of DailyKOS, they are a radical left hate site that lies more often than not.
So let's look at the partisan shit the fuckwads at lying Snopes vomit out?
{On 1 July 2016, the notoriously unreliable
Breitbart web site }
Well good thing these protectors of troofiness start off in such a fair an unbiased manner. You can see that they will be looking only at facts.
{“conservative icon” Sarah Palin’s quipping that “paid anti-Trump protesters show presidential candidate Donald Trump is creating jobs even before taking office,” and quoting her as follows:}
Why did the little Goebles at Snopes put “conservative icon” in quotes? Are they saying Palin is not a conservative icon? What do the partisan hacks intend?
{“We’ve been telling [Trump] he should hold his rallies at construction sites. You know protesters aren’t going to show up at a job site,” said Palin. “Did you know some of those rebel rousers, they’re actually paid protesters. So there you go, not even president yet and our guy’s already creating jobs.”}
So is it the contention of the lying frauds at Snopes that Palin did not say those words? Are they claiming Breitbart falsely attributed words she did not say?
{Of course, such a quip wouldn’t be funny — or relevant — if paid protesters weren’t actually showing up at rallies for GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump. And as usual,
Breitbart had a problem with not being able to demonstrate that what they were reporting was actually true.}
Oh, I get it, the leftist fucks don't like Palin's opinion. That's fine, Snopes is a radical left advocacy site. The problem is that the pretend to be fact checking. Instead they are editorializing with their opinion.
And remember, the job of REAL Journalists, Brietbart has them, the NY Times does not, is to accurately relay what Palin said. Makes no difference if they agree or disagree, they are reporting on what she said.
Snopes are partisan liars, as proven above.