Why won't Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations?

[1776]

Stupid shit...so how does banning tourist and business travel from Ebola countries hurt fighting it in Africa???

Idiots like you claim private and military planes couldn't bring supplies and medical personnel to those countries if locals aren't allowed to fly back to NYC on Delta airlines???

You are fucking insane.

Oh you can shove your retard articles up your Ebola ass.

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Or maybe it is because creating a ban would actually be worse than not.

Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

WASHINGTON (AP) - A ban on travel from West Africa might seem like a simple and smart response to the frightening Ebola outbreak there. It's become a central demand of Republicans on Capitol Hill and some Democrats, and is popular with the public. But health experts are nearly unanimous in saying it's a bad idea that could backfire.

The experts' key objection is that a travel ban could prevent needed medical supplies, food and health care workers from reaching Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, the nations where the epidemic is at its worst. Without that aid, the deadly virus might spread to wider areas of Africa, making it even more of a threat to the U.S. and the world, experts say.

In addition, preventing people from the affected countries from traveling to the U.S. could be difficult to enforce and might generate counterproductive results, such as people lying about their travel history or attempting to evade screening.

The U.S. has not instituted a travel ban in response to a disease outbreak in recent history. The experts insist now is not the time to start, especially given that the disease is still extremely contained in the U.S. and the only people who have caught it here are two health care workers who cared for a sick patient who later died.

"If we know anything in global health it's that you can't wrap a whole region in cellophane and expect to keep out a rapidly moving infectious disease. It doesn't work that way," said Lawrence Gostin, a professor and global health expert at Georgetown University Law Center. "Ultimately people will flee one way or another, and the more infection there is and the more people there are, the more they flee and the more unsafe we are."

AOL.com Article - Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

Once again, proof positive that Obama is much smarter than the average Yogi Bear. He actually listens to people who know what the fuck they are doing.

 

[PredFan]

Stupid shit...so how does banning tourist and business travel from Ebola countries hurt fighting it in Africa???

Idiots like you claim private and military planes couldn't bring supplies and medical personnel to those countries if locals aren't allowed to fly back to NYC on Delta airlines???

You are fucking insane.

Oh you can shove your retard articles up your Ebola ass.

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Or maybe it is because creating a ban would actually be worse than not.

Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

WASHINGTON (AP) - A ban on travel from West Africa might seem like a simple and smart response to the frightening Ebola outbreak there. It's become a central demand of Republicans on Capitol Hill and some Democrats, and is popular with the public. But health experts are nearly unanimous in saying it's a bad idea that could backfire.

The experts' key objection is that a travel ban could prevent needed medical supplies, food and health care workers from reaching Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, the nations where the epidemic is at its worst. Without that aid, the deadly virus might spread to wider areas of Africa, making it even more of a threat to the U.S. and the world, experts say.

In addition, preventing people from the affected countries from traveling to the U.S. could be difficult to enforce and might generate counterproductive results, such as people lying about their travel history or attempting to evade screening.

The U.S. has not instituted a travel ban in response to a disease outbreak in recent history. The experts insist now is not the time to start, especially given that the disease is still extremely contained in the U.S. and the only people who have caught it here are two health care workers who cared for a sick patient who later died.

"If we know anything in global health it's that you can't wrap a whole region in cellophane and expect to keep out a rapidly moving infectious disease. It doesn't work that way," said Lawrence Gostin, a professor and global health expert at Georgetown University Law Center. "Ultimately people will flee one way or another, and the more infection there is and the more people there are, the more they flee and the more unsafe we are."

AOL.com Article - Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

Once again, proof positive that Obama is much smarter than the average Yogi Bear. He actually listens to people who know what the fuck they are doing.

He believes it because it's easier to cut and paste than to think.

 

[auditor0007]

I have a better idea. I have a broomstick to shove up your stupid ass.

Stupid shit...so how does banning tourist and business travel from Ebola countries hurt fighting it in Africa???

Idiots like you claim private and military planes couldn't bring supplies and medical personnel to those countries if locals aren't allowed to fly back to NYC on Delta airlines???

You are fucking insane.

Oh you can shove your retard articles up your Ebola ass.

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Or maybe it is because creating a ban would actually be worse than not.

Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

WASHINGTON (AP) - A ban on travel from West Africa might seem like a simple and smart response to the frightening Ebola outbreak there. It's become a central demand of Republicans on Capitol Hill and some Democrats, and is popular with the public. But health experts are nearly unanimous in saying it's a bad idea that could backfire.

The experts' key objection is that a travel ban could prevent needed medical supplies, food and health care workers from reaching Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, the nations where the epidemic is at its worst. Without that aid, the deadly virus might spread to wider areas of Africa, making it even more of a threat to the U.S. and the world, experts say.

In addition, preventing people from the affected countries from traveling to the U.S. could be difficult to enforce and might generate counterproductive results, such as people lying about their travel history or attempting to evade screening.

The U.S. has not instituted a travel ban in response to a disease outbreak in recent history. The experts insist now is not the time to start, especially given that the disease is still extremely contained in the U.S. and the only people who have caught it here are two health care workers who cared for a sick patient who later died.

"If we know anything in global health it's that you can't wrap a whole region in cellophane and expect to keep out a rapidly moving infectious disease. It doesn't work that way," said Lawrence Gostin, a professor and global health expert at Georgetown University Law Center. "Ultimately people will flee one way or another, and the more infection there is and the more people there are, the more they flee and the more unsafe we are."

AOL.com Article - Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

Once again, proof positive that Obama is much smarter than the average Yogi Bear. He actually listens to people who know what the fuck they are doing.

 

[1776]

Of course shitstain.....you can't prove why banning non-Americans from Ebola countries is going to cause it to get worse.

Just say it, "it is just so unfair that they have it and we don't."

I have a better idea. I have a broomstick to shove up your stupid ass.

Stupid shit...so how does banning tourist and business travel from Ebola countries hurt fighting it in Africa???

Idiots like you claim private and military planes couldn't bring supplies and medical personnel to those countries if locals aren't allowed to fly back to NYC on Delta airlines???

You are fucking insane.

Oh you can shove your retard articles up your Ebola ass.

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Or maybe it is because creating a ban would actually be worse than not.

Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

WASHINGTON (AP) - A ban on travel from West Africa might seem like a simple and smart response to the frightening Ebola outbreak there. It's become a central demand of Republicans on Capitol Hill and some Democrats, and is popular with the public. But health experts are nearly unanimous in saying it's a bad idea that could backfire.

The experts' key objection is that a travel ban could prevent needed medical supplies, food and health care workers from reaching Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, the nations where the epidemic is at its worst. Without that aid, the deadly virus might spread to wider areas of Africa, making it even more of a threat to the U.S. and the world, experts say.

In addition, preventing people from the affected countries from traveling to the U.S. could be difficult to enforce and might generate counterproductive results, such as people lying about their travel history or attempting to evade screening.

The U.S. has not instituted a travel ban in response to a disease outbreak in recent history. The experts insist now is not the time to start, especially given that the disease is still extremely contained in the U.S. and the only people who have caught it here are two health care workers who cared for a sick patient who later died.

"If we know anything in global health it's that you can't wrap a whole region in cellophane and expect to keep out a rapidly moving infectious disease. It doesn't work that way," said Lawrence Gostin, a professor and global health expert at Georgetown University Law Center. "Ultimately people will flee one way or another, and the more infection there is and the more people there are, the more they flee and the more unsafe we are."

AOL.com Article - Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

Once again, proof positive that Obama is much smarter than the average Yogi Bear. He actually listens to people who know what the fuck they are doing.

 

[auditor0007]

Being a moron is one thing; proving it is quite funny, and you do it over and over again. Obviously you didn't read the article at all. Just stick with your isolationist ideas. It will keep your feeling safe. I have a good idea for you. Don't leave your home, ever. You will be safe.

Of course shitstain.....you can't prove why banning non-Americans from Ebola countries is going to cause it to get worse.

Just say it, "it is just so unfair that they have it and we don't."

I have a better idea. I have a broomstick to shove up your stupid ass.

Stupid shit...so how does banning tourist and business travel from Ebola countries hurt fighting it in Africa???

Idiots like you claim private and military planes couldn't bring supplies and medical personnel to those countries if locals aren't allowed to fly back to NYC on Delta airlines???

You are fucking insane.

Oh you can shove your retard articles up your Ebola ass.

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Or maybe it is because creating a ban would actually be worse than not.

Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

WASHINGTON (AP) - A ban on travel from West Africa might seem like a simple and smart response to the frightening Ebola outbreak there. It's become a central demand of Republicans on Capitol Hill and some Democrats, and is popular with the public. But health experts are nearly unanimous in saying it's a bad idea that could backfire.

The experts' key objection is that a travel ban could prevent needed medical supplies, food and health care workers from reaching Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, the nations where the epidemic is at its worst. Without that aid, the deadly virus might spread to wider areas of Africa, making it even more of a threat to the U.S. and the world, experts say.

In addition, preventing people from the affected countries from traveling to the U.S. could be difficult to enforce and might generate counterproductive results, such as people lying about their travel history or attempting to evade screening.

The U.S. has not instituted a travel ban in response to a disease outbreak in recent history. The experts insist now is not the time to start, especially given that the disease is still extremely contained in the U.S. and the only people who have caught it here are two health care workers who cared for a sick patient who later died.

"If we know anything in global health it's that you can't wrap a whole region in cellophane and expect to keep out a rapidly moving infectious disease. It doesn't work that way," said Lawrence Gostin, a professor and global health expert at Georgetown University Law Center. "Ultimately people will flee one way or another, and the more infection there is and the more people there are, the more they flee and the more unsafe we are."

AOL.com Article - Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

Once again, proof positive that Obama is much smarter than the average Yogi Bear. He actually listens to people who know what the fuck they are doing.

 

[1776]

You are the stupid fucks Obama needs.....

Being a moron is one thing; proving it is quite funny, and you do it over and over again. Obviously you didn't read the article at all. Just stick with your isolationist ideas. It will keep your feeling safe. I have a good idea for you. Don't leave your home, ever. You will be safe.

Of course shitstain.....you can't prove why banning non-Americans from Ebola countries is going to cause it to get worse.

Just say it, "it is just so unfair that they have it and we don't."

I have a better idea. I have a broomstick to shove up your stupid ass.

Stupid shit...so how does banning tourist and business travel from Ebola countries hurt fighting it in Africa???

Idiots like you claim private and military planes couldn't bring supplies and medical personnel to those countries if locals aren't allowed to fly back to NYC on Delta airlines???

You are fucking insane.

Oh you can shove your retard articles up your Ebola ass.

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Or maybe it is because creating a ban would actually be worse than not.

Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

WASHINGTON (AP) - A ban on travel from West Africa might seem like a simple and smart response to the frightening Ebola outbreak there. It's become a central demand of Republicans on Capitol Hill and some Democrats, and is popular with the public. But health experts are nearly unanimous in saying it's a bad idea that could backfire.

The experts' key objection is that a travel ban could prevent needed medical supplies, food and health care workers from reaching Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, the nations where the epidemic is at its worst. Without that aid, the deadly virus might spread to wider areas of Africa, making it even more of a threat to the U.S. and the world, experts say.

In addition, preventing people from the affected countries from traveling to the U.S. could be difficult to enforce and might generate counterproductive results, such as people lying about their travel history or attempting to evade screening.

The U.S. has not instituted a travel ban in response to a disease outbreak in recent history. The experts insist now is not the time to start, especially given that the disease is still extremely contained in the U.S. and the only people who have caught it here are two health care workers who cared for a sick patient who later died.

"If we know anything in global health it's that you can't wrap a whole region in cellophane and expect to keep out a rapidly moving infectious disease. It doesn't work that way," said Lawrence Gostin, a professor and global health expert at Georgetown University Law Center. "Ultimately people will flee one way or another, and the more infection there is and the more people there are, the more they flee and the more unsafe we are."

AOL.com Article - Effectiveness of Ebola travel ban questioned

Once again, proof positive that Obama is much smarter than the average Yogi Bear. He actually listens to people who know what the fuck they are doing.

 

[Dana7360]

My guess too. His view that America is imperialist.

It's called keeping Americans safe. And he's not doing it.

If you think a ban of flights from the ebola effected nations is going to keep you safe then you're already safe in your mind.

There are no flights from the ebola effected nations to America.

The information is extremely easy to find. Why not try a little research before you make demands on something that doesn't even exist?

What most people are talking about is a visa ban. The term "flight ban" was invented by leftwing propagandists as a straw man.

Look at the title to this thread.

Look at the post I replied to.

There isn't one word about visas or passports. The person was replying to and agreeing that America should ban flights from ebola effected nations.

Now, if you want to change the subject to visas and passports fine. Start a new thread. However don't lie and claim something different from what was posted by a different poster.

If it was invented by a left wing person please explain the photo in the article that clearly shouts BAN THE FLIGHTS!

If most people were talking about visas and passports, please explain the photo in the article that clearly shouts BAN THE FLIGHTS!

If most people were talking about passports and visas, if the flight ban phrase was invented by left wing people, then why are so many right wing people and politicians screaming for Obama to ban flights from ebola stricken nations?

I just did a search on conservatives demand flights from ebola stricken nations banned. Click the link and pick your article. Because there are tens of thousands of articles listing many conservative politicians and people who demand for a ban on flights from ebola stricken nations.

‎www.bing.com/search?q=conservatives+demand+flights+from+ebola+stricken+nations+banned&go=Submit&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=conservatives+demand+flights+…

 

[Dana7360]

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Question: Which of those countries (Liberia, Guinea, or Sierra Leone) have direct flights to the US?

Irrelevant.

You people are screaming for a ban on flights from ebola effected nations.

Well you got it!

There are no flights from ebola effected nations to America.

Now stop your whining. You already have what you demand.

Hey moron, we aren't as stupid as you are. We know that there aren't any direct flights from there to here. We know that Duncan didn't fly directly to here.

Take your stupidity somewhere else.

You might want to tell that to the OP.

The OP clearly wants a ban on flights from nations that are effected by ebola. Or the OP wouldn't have started this thread.

Notice there's not one word about passports or visas. All the person wants is for the flights to be banned.

Since all of you conservatives were in agreement with the OP and bashed Obama for allowing flights, it seems to me that none of you knew there were no flights from ebola stricken nations to America.

So stop the lies.

 

[Ibentoken]

 

[1776]

It's quite simple.

Ban passports/visas for people from Ebola countries unless they clear a 30-45 day UN run quarantine in a third country.

Ban all commercial flights from Ebola countries coming to the US.

Send medical personnel and supplies via chartered planes and only allow them to come back to the US after they do a 30-45 day quarantine run by USAFRICOM.

 

[PredFan]

Read more: Blog Why won t Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations

Perhaps he sees himself a citizen of the world and would not punish nations in Africa who have suffered from being colonized by the West. He did call himself a citizen of the world in 2008 - while overseas.

Given testimony delivered this week by CDC head Tom Frieden it does seem that President Obama is the person preventing the ban from being imposed , ignoring the will –again-of the vast majority of Americans who see such an action as being a sensible precaution, especially given the incompetence so pervasive in our government. Protests have started across from the White House, complete with Hazmat-costumed people :

Question: Which of those countries (Liberia, Guinea, or Sierra Leone) have direct flights to the US?

Irrelevant.

You people are screaming for a ban on flights from ebola effected nations.

Well you got it!

There are no flights from ebola effected nations to America.

Now stop your whining. You already have what you demand.

Hey moron, we aren't as stupid as you are. We know that there aren't any direct flights from there to here. We know that Duncan didn't fly directly to here.

Take your stupidity somewhere else.

You might want to tell that to the OP.

The OP clearly wants a ban on flights from nations that are effected by ebola. Or the OP wouldn't have started this thread.

Notice there's not one word about passports or visas. All the person wants is for the flights to be banned.

Since all of you conservatives were in agreement with the OP and bashed Obama for allowing flights, it seems to me that none of you knew there were no flights from ebola stricken nations to America.

So stop the lies.

No lies at all. We said to stop all travel for the effected countries to here. You tried and failed to use some kind if idiotic "gotcha". Don't bother trying to spin your way out of it. No one is buying that either.

 

[1776]

Obama hates the military, thus why he doesn't see their role in this mess by helping control the flow of people into the US from this cesspool area and controlling anyone brought here with Ebola keeping them out of the community and in real isolation.

Instead he is relying on dumbfucks at the CDC and random hospitals to do this public health mission that could blow up within days to thousands of infected people with endless Ebola carriers being allowed to come here.

 

[Dana7360]

Question: Which of those countries (Liberia, Guinea, or Sierra Leone) have direct flights to the US?

Irrelevant.

You can't ban flights from a country into the USA when that country doesn't even have direct flights into the US. That's a given. It would be like building a dam where there's no river.

Many African nations have direct flights do the US.

Not the ones that have the ebola epidemic. There are no flights to America from those ebola effected nations.

You're whining about something that's not even happening.

How did Duncan get here then idiot? How fucking stupid are you? It is irrelevant that there aren't direct flights here.

There are no direct flights from Liberia to America.

He got here by going to Europe first. His flight landed in Belgium. Then caught a flight from Belgium to America.

You might want to do some research on how he got here.

Texas has ebola. Should we ban all flights from Texas to other parts of the nation? We can do that, there are actual flights that go from Texas to just about every other state in the nation.

I wonder how you would feel if states started refusing flights from Texas from being able to land in their state?

You might want to discuss that you already know no flights come from the ebola stricken nations with the OP. The OP wants flights from ebola stricken nations banned. So do the people in they article the OP posted. So to many other conservatives.

So when I point out to you how stupid you are what do you do? Show me that you're even more stupid than I thought.

 

[Dana7360]

Question: Which of those countries (Liberia, Guinea, or Sierra Leone) have direct flights to the US?

Irrelevant.

You people are screaming for a ban on flights from ebola effected nations.

Well you got it!

There are no flights from ebola effected nations to America.

Now stop your whining. You already have what you demand.

Hey moron, we aren't as stupid as you are. We know that there aren't any direct flights from there to here. We know that Duncan didn't fly directly to here.

Take your stupidity somewhere else.

You might want to tell that to the OP.

The OP clearly wants a ban on flights from nations that are effected by ebola. Or the OP wouldn't have started this thread.

Notice there's not one word about passports or visas. All the person wants is for the flights to be banned.

Since all of you conservatives were in agreement with the OP and bashed Obama for allowing flights, it seems to me that none of you knew there were no flights from ebola stricken nations to America.

So stop the lies.

No lies at all. We said to stop all travel for the effected countries to here. You tried and failed to use some kind if idiotic "gotcha". Don't bother trying to spin your way out of it. No one is buying that either.

We don't have any travel from ebola effected countries to America. There are no flights that go from the ebola stricken nations to America. Not even one.

So stop demanding that all flights from those nations be banned. You can't ban something that's already not happening.

Now if you want to ban all people who have passports from those nations fine. But don't contribute to and agree with a thread that's titled "Why won't Obama impose a flight ban from Ebola-stricken nations?"

You're blaming Obama for something that's not happening.

If you want to ban all flights from ebola stricken nations to the rest of the world, you're out of luck. You're not the king of the world and you can't tell other nations what to do.

 

[PredFan]

Irrelevant.

You can't ban flights from a country into the USA when that country doesn't even have direct flights into the US. That's a given. It would be like building a dam where there's no river.

Many African nations have direct flights do the US.

Not the ones that have the ebola epidemic. There are no flights to America from those ebola effected nations.

You're whining about something that's not even happening.

How did Duncan get here then idiot? How fucking stupid are you? It is irrelevant that there aren't direct flights here.

There are no direct flights from Liberia to America.

He got here by going to Europe first. His flight landed in Belgium. Then caught a flight from Belgium to America.

You might want to do some research on how he got here.

Texas has ebola. Should we ban all flights from Texas to other parts of the nation? We can do that, there are actual flights that go from Texas to just about every other state in the nation.

I wonder how you would feel if states started refusing flights from Texas from being able to land in their state?

You might want to discuss that you already know no flights come from the ebola stricken nations with the OP. The OP wants flights from ebola stricken nations banned. So do the people in they article the OP posted. So to many other conservatives.

So when I point out to you how stupid you are what do you do? Show me that you're even more stupid than I thought.

No direct flights? No shit I've already said that three times.

I know he got here from Belgium idiot, I only said that twice.

Is the Ebola virus loose in Texas dumbass?

How fucking stupid are you really? You ever heard of passports idiot?

Christ you are a moron.

 

[bripat9643]

You can't ban flights from a country into the USA when that country doesn't even have direct flights into the US. That's a given. It would be like building a dam where there's no river.

Many African nations have direct flights do the US.

Not the ones that have the ebola epidemic. There are no flights to America from those ebola effected nations.

You're whining about something that's not even happening.

How did Duncan get here then idiot? How fucking stupid are you? It is irrelevant that there aren't direct flights here.

There are no direct flights from Liberia to America.

He got here by going to Europe first. His flight landed in Belgium. Then caught a flight from Belgium to America.

You might want to do some research on how he got here.

Texas has ebola. Should we ban all flights from Texas to other parts of the nation? We can do that, there are actual flights that go from Texas to just about every other state in the nation.

I wonder how you would feel if states started refusing flights from Texas from being able to land in their state?

You might want to discuss that you already know no flights come from the ebola stricken nations with the OP. The OP wants flights from ebola stricken nations banned. So do the people in they article the OP posted. So to many other conservatives.

So when I point out to you how stupid you are what do you do? Show me that you're even more stupid than I thought.

No direct flights? No shit I've already said that three times.

I know he got here from Belgium idiot, I only said that twice.

Is the Ebola virus loose in Texas dumbass?

How fucking stupid are you really? You ever heard of passports idiot?

Christ you are a moron.

They'll keep harping on the "direct flights" meme because they can't explain why they want to allow people possibly infected with Ebola to be allowed into the country. They're like the drunk who was looking for his keys under the lamp post. When asked if that's where he lost his keys, he said "no," but that's were the light was the best.

 

[PredFan]

Many African nations have direct flights do the US.

Not the ones that have the ebola epidemic. There are no flights to America from those ebola effected nations.

You're whining about something that's not even happening.

How did Duncan get here then idiot? How fucking stupid are you? It is irrelevant that there aren't direct flights here.

There are no direct flights from Liberia to America.

He got here by going to Europe first. His flight landed in Belgium. Then caught a flight from Belgium to America.

You might want to do some research on how he got here.

Texas has ebola. Should we ban all flights from Texas to other parts of the nation? We can do that, there are actual flights that go from Texas to just about every other state in the nation.

I wonder how you would feel if states started refusing flights from Texas from being able to land in their state?

You might want to discuss that you already know no flights come from the ebola stricken nations with the OP. The OP wants flights from ebola stricken nations banned. So do the people in they article the OP posted. So to many other conservatives.

So when I point out to you how stupid you are what do you do? Show me that you're even more stupid than I thought.

No direct flights? No shit I've already said that three times.

I know he got here from Belgium idiot, I only said that twice.

Is the Ebola virus loose in Texas dumbass?

How fucking stupid are you really? You ever heard of passports idiot?

Christ you are a moron.

They'll keep harping on the "direct flights" meme because they can't explain why they want to allow people possibly infected with Ebola to be allowed into the country. They're like the drunk who was looking for his keys under the lamp post. When asked if that's where he lost his keys, he said "no," but that's were the light was the best.

It's all he has. He'll probably run off and spout that nonsense in another thread and think he's making a point.

 

[TooTall]

Have you lefties gone so far overboard that you have absolutely no ability to use common sense anymore?

I can easily explain how a flight ban will keep Ebola from spreading, can you rationally explain how it will make things worse? Feel free to use the idiotic statements that the morons in the obama administration use.

We already have that ban. There are no flights to America from the ebola effected nations.

You can't tell other nations what to do or what flights they can accept into their nation. You don't rule the world. Or even America.

Stop whining about something that's not happening. And stop thinking you're king of the world who has a right to tell other nations what flights they can or can't accept into their nations.

I agree that there are no direct flights from the affected areas to the US. They have to change planes or at least refuel the one they are on at an airport in Europe. Banning anyone with a passport from West Africa would be a start and to the best of my knowledge, they have to have a VISA to come to the US. Where do you think they get the VISA from?

 

[bripat9643]

Have you lefties gone so far overboard that you have absolutely no ability to use common sense anymore?

I can easily explain how a flight ban will keep Ebola from spreading, can you rationally explain how it will make things worse? Feel free to use the idiotic statements that the morons in the obama administration use.

We already have that ban. There are no flights to America from the ebola effected nations.

You can't tell other nations what to do or what flights they can accept into their nation. You don't rule the world. Or even America.

Stop whining about something that's not happening. And stop thinking you're king of the world who has a right to tell other nations what flights they can or can't accept into their nations.

I agree that there are no direct flights from the affected areas to the US. They have to change planes or at least refuel the one they are on at an airport in Europe. Banning anyone with a passport from West Africa would be a start and to the best of my knowledge, they have to have a VISA to come to the US. Where do you think they get the VISA from?

They get it from Obama, and he has expedited the process for Ebola carriers to get permission to come to the United States.

 

[blackhawk]