Why Women are Unfit to Lead

[William Joyce]

Just read this.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060309/OPINION02/603090484/1070/OPINION

Apparently, this is something she actually wrote. Not a parody, from what I can see.

 

[manu1959]

i would rather follow a woman than a man....

 

[Nienna]

Just read this.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060309/OPINION02/603090484/1070/OPINION

Apparently, this is something she actually wrote. Not a parody, from what I can see.

It's not her "womanness" that makes her unfit to lead; it's her "liberalness."

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Affirmative Action should be banned. Our freedom and tolerance makes us great, not our diversity.

 

[no1tovote4]

If these "progressives" keep up with their separatist ideation (black history month, women's history month, hispanic history month) it will only serve to separate the nation further.

It appears as if Martin Luther King, Jr's dream has been lost in ineptitude and it is time that the banner be picked up and carried by a new group. One actually aiming at true equal treatment rather than separatists specializatin of treatment.

 

[Nienna]

Affirmative Action should be banned. Our freedom and tolerance makes us great, not our diversity.

That stuck out in my mind, too.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Affirmative Action should be banned. Our freedom and tolerance makes us great, not our diversity.

Diversty does make us great, but only if it's not forced.

 

[no1tovote4]

Diversty does make us great, but only if it's not forced.

Diversity is a natural product of tolerance. Not this mangled version of tolerance where everybody has to come to the same conclusion or be termed 'racist', but real tolerance.

 

[dilloduck]

Diversty does make us great, but only if it's not forced.

Exactly how does diversity make us great?

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Diversty does make us great, but only if it's not forced.

How?

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Exactly how does diversity make us great?

The whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Diversity is a natural product of tolerance. Not this mangled version of tolerance where everybody has to come to the same conclusion or be termed 'racist', but real tolerance.

Absolutely.

 

[dilloduck]

The whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

Tippaccanoo and Tyler too

 

[rtwngAvngr]

The whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

But parts can be from the same manufacturer and still work just as well together.

The truth is: libs only believe in racial diversity. When it comes to ideological diversity, they are snobbish, dismissive, totalitarian and decietful.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Tippaccanoo and Tyler too

Sorry. RWA likes things in succinct, slogan-like fashion. Just trying to minimize his work load.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Sorry. RWA likes things in succint, slogan-like fashion. Just trying to minimize his work load.

Get over your obsession with me and figure out why you're so brainwashed.

 

[dilloduck]

Sorry. RWA likes things in succint, slogan-like fashion. Just trying to minimize his work load.

my bad--I forget he's been hanging out on the dark side lately. :teeth:

 

[The ClayTaurus]

But parts can be from the same manufacturer and still work just as well together.

The truth is: libs only believe in racial diversity. When it comes to ideological diversity, they are snobbish, dismissive, totalitarian and decietful.

But if you were clever and patient enough, you would assemble a much better product taking the best parts of each manufacturer, instead of all parts from one manufacturer. Your way is definitely easier, and requires less thinking, but the potential is also lower. A classic trade-off study.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Get over your obsession with me and figure out why you're so brainwashed.

You're a grumpy little boy this morning, aren't you? Yes you are!


Go get some oatmeal and chill out.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

But if you were clever and patient enough, you would assemble a much better product taking the best parts of each manufacturer, instead of all parts from one manufacturer. Your way is definitely easier, and requires less thinking, but the potential is also lower. A classic trade-off study.

SO you advocate waiting for parts yet to be created in the chance that a manufacturer might create a better one. Do you see why liberals are losing elections? They're insane.