Why Waste Time Suing Twitter When You Already Have Gettr?

[Biff_Poindexter]

Experts say Trump's social media lawsuits are likely doomed

The suits argue that Facebook and Twitter are "state actors," a claim unlikely to stand up in court.

www.axios.com

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars say former President Donald Trump's class-action lawsuits announced Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter, Google, and their CEOs are unlikely to go far. Experts, suggests Trump's chief aim is to fire up his supporters and fundraise off of their anger over what they see as censorship by Big Tech. "This is not a lawsuit. It’s a fundraising grift," said Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a progressive advocacy group that often targets Big Tech."

I mean, it would be awesome if government could just nationalize private companies like Facebook and Twitter and declare them as public commodities...but if we already believe that both of these big-tech platforms are controlled by the Deep State; then doesn't that mean they are already under government control?? Anyhoo -- why should conservatives be so pressed about Twitter if there are already other platforms who doesn't censor anyone??


Gettr is here -- in a short span of time it will be the largest social media platform in human history -- so why waste time and money on suing?? Defeat your big tech competition in the marketplace.

Gettr, the latest pro-Trump social network, is already a mess | TechCrunch

Well, that was fast. Just days after a Twitter clone from former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller launched, the new social network is already beset by

techcrunch.com

However, everyone knows that this is just another vehicle to fund-raise off of and line some pockets.....pretty similar to that Arizona audit; a money making grift that won't produce much but more disillusioned Trumpers who will be forced to go deeper into their conspiracy-bag to explain away reality....

 

[Uncensored2008]

Look at Buff_Knobpolisher piss himself over TRUMPPPPPPPP!!!!!

 

[Faun]

Experts say Trump's social media lawsuits are likely doomed

The suits argue that Facebook and Twitter are "state actors," a claim unlikely to stand up in court.

www.axios.com

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars say former President Donald Trump's class-action lawsuits announced Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter, Google, and their CEOs are unlikely to go far. Experts, suggests Trump's chief aim is to fire up his supporters and fundraise off of their anger over what they see as censorship by Big Tech. "This is not a lawsuit. It’s a fundraising grift," said Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a progressive advocacy group that often targets Big Tech."

I mean, it would be awesome if government could just nationalize private companies like Facebook and Twitter and declare them as public commodities...but if we already believe that both of these big-tech platforms are controlled by the Deep State; then doesn't that mean they are already under government control?? Anyhoo -- why should conservatives be so pressed about Twitter if there are already other platforms who doesn't censor anyone??


Gettr is here -- in a short span of time it will be the largest social media platform in human history -- so why waste time and money on suing?? Defeat your big tech competition in the marketplace.

Gettr, the latest pro-Trump social network, is already a mess | TechCrunch

Well, that was fast. Just days after a Twitter clone from former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller launched, the new social network is already beset by

techcrunch.com

However, everyone knows that this is just another vehicle to fund-raise off of and line some pockets.....pretty similar to that Arizona audit; a money making grift that won't produce much but more disillusioned Trumpers who will be forced to go deeper into their conspiracy-bag to explain away reality....

Trump chose to run as a Republican because he knew conservatives are saps who never learn.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Look at Buff_Knobpolisher piss himself over TRUMPPPPPPPP!!!!!

Cool story bro

 

[Dekster]

Experts say Trump's social media lawsuits are likely doomed

The suits argue that Facebook and Twitter are "state actors," a claim unlikely to stand up in court.

www.axios.com

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars say former President Donald Trump's class-action lawsuits announced Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter, Google, and their CEOs are unlikely to go far. Experts, suggests Trump's chief aim is to fire up his supporters and fundraise off of their anger over what they see as censorship by Big Tech. "This is not a lawsuit. It’s a fundraising grift," said Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a progressive advocacy group that often targets Big Tech."

I mean, it would be awesome if government could just nationalize private companies like Facebook and Twitter and declare them as public commodities...but if we already believe that both of these big-tech platforms are controlled by the Deep State; then doesn't that mean they are already under government control?? Anyhoo -- why should conservatives be so pressed about Twitter if there are already other platforms who doesn't censor anyone??


Gettr is here -- in a short span of time it will be the largest social media platform in human history -- so why waste time and money on suing?? Defeat your big tech competition in the marketplace.

Gettr, the latest pro-Trump social network, is already a mess | TechCrunch

Well, that was fast. Just days after a Twitter clone from former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller launched, the new social network is already beset by

techcrunch.com

However, everyone knows that this is just another vehicle to fund-raise off of and line some pockets.....pretty similar to that Arizona audit; a money making grift that won't produce much but more disillusioned Trumpers who will be forced to go deeper into their conspiracy-bag to explain away reality....

Causes lose until they don't. Your argument would be akin to telling a gay person 30 years ago or a black person 60 years ago that they shouldn't pursue their rights because they wouldn't win.

He doesn't have to win this case in order to create a political will for change.

 

[EvMetro]

Experts say Trump's social media lawsuits are likely doomed

The suits argue that Facebook and Twitter are "state actors," a claim unlikely to stand up in court.

www.axios.com

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars say former President Donald Trump's class-action lawsuits announced Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter, Google, and their CEOs are unlikely to go far. Experts, suggests Trump's chief aim is to fire up his supporters and fundraise off of their anger over what they see as censorship by Big Tech. "This is not a lawsuit. It’s a fundraising grift," said Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a progressive advocacy group that often targets Big Tech."

I mean, it would be awesome if government could just nationalize private companies like Facebook and Twitter and declare them as public commodities...but if we already believe that both of these big-tech platforms are controlled by the Deep State; then doesn't that mean they are already under government control?? Anyhoo -- why should conservatives be so pressed about Twitter if there are already other platforms who doesn't censor anyone??


Gettr is here -- in a short span of time it will be the largest social media platform in human history -- so why waste time and money on suing?? Defeat your big tech competition in the marketplace.

Gettr, the latest pro-Trump social network, is already a mess | TechCrunch

Well, that was fast. Just days after a Twitter clone from former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller launched, the new social network is already beset by

techcrunch.com

However, everyone knows that this is just another vehicle to fund-raise off of and line some pockets.....pretty similar to that Arizona audit; a money making grift that won't produce much but more disillusioned Trumpers who will be forced to go deeper into their conspiracy-bag to explain away reality....

Causes lose until they don't. Your argument would be akin to telling a gay person 30 years ago or a black person 60 years ago that they shouldn't pursue their rights because they wouldn't win.

He doesn't have to win this case in order to create a political will for change.

Great post. I'd like to see a victory here but if not, I'd like this to reach discovery phase. Big censorship could take some hits in discovery.

 

[TheParser]

As I understand it, if it can be proved that Big Tech is following the government's order to ban certain users, then that would be the government violating the First Amendment.

So maybe, just maybe, this lawsuit will eventually produce some kind of compromise down the line.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

He knows he can't win, but he is trying to stay relevant and keep Trump Humpers thinking he is still fighting the Deeeeeeeeeeeep State.

 

[Uncensored2008]

As I understand it, if it can be proved that Big Tech is following the government's order to ban certain users, then that would be the government violating the First Amendment.

So maybe, just maybe, this lawsuit will eventually produce some kind of compromise down the line.

We know Quid Pro demanded the Monopoly ban Trump. Since the Monopoly acted on behalf of Xi's man this is a case of election tampering. The Monopoly acted to effect the outcome of a presidential election. The Monopoly is a trust that ensures no competition threatens it - as such it is a conspiracy. Ergo this is racketeering to alter an election.

The robber barons of the Monopoly should face prison time over this.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Experts say Trump's social media lawsuits are likely doomed

The suits argue that Facebook and Twitter are "state actors," a claim unlikely to stand up in court.

www.axios.com

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars say former President Donald Trump's class-action lawsuits announced Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter, Google, and their CEOs are unlikely to go far. Experts, suggests Trump's chief aim is to fire up his supporters and fundraise off of their anger over what they see as censorship by Big Tech. "This is not a lawsuit. It’s a fundraising grift," said Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a progressive advocacy group that often targets Big Tech."

I mean, it would be awesome if government could just nationalize private companies like Facebook and Twitter and declare them as public commodities...but if we already believe that both of these big-tech platforms are controlled by the Deep State; then doesn't that mean they are already under government control?? Anyhoo -- why should conservatives be so pressed about Twitter if there are already other platforms who doesn't censor anyone??


Gettr is here -- in a short span of time it will be the largest social media platform in human history -- so why waste time and money on suing?? Defeat your big tech competition in the marketplace.

Gettr, the latest pro-Trump social network, is already a mess | TechCrunch

Well, that was fast. Just days after a Twitter clone from former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller launched, the new social network is already beset by

techcrunch.com

However, everyone knows that this is just another vehicle to fund-raise off of and line some pockets.....pretty similar to that Arizona audit; a money making grift that won't produce much but more disillusioned Trumpers who will be forced to go deeper into their conspiracy-bag to explain away reality....

Causes lose until they don't. Your argument would be akin to telling a gay person 30 years ago or a black person 60 years ago that they shouldn't pursue their rights because they wouldn't win.

He doesn't have to win this case in order to create a political will for change.

Lol...

Are you actually trying to tie Trump being kicked off of Twitter to Civil Rights?

Bawahahahahahhahahaha


The black person 60 years ago had every justification to pursue his rights because those rights were rightfully his and Constitutionally enshrined...

Can you tell me where in the Constitution does it say you can violate a private company's TOS that you agreed to??

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Experts say Trump's social media lawsuits are likely doomed

The suits argue that Facebook and Twitter are "state actors," a claim unlikely to stand up in court.

www.axios.com

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars say former President Donald Trump's class-action lawsuits announced Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter, Google, and their CEOs are unlikely to go far. Experts, suggests Trump's chief aim is to fire up his supporters and fundraise off of their anger over what they see as censorship by Big Tech. "This is not a lawsuit. It’s a fundraising grift," said Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a progressive advocacy group that often targets Big Tech."

I mean, it would be awesome if government could just nationalize private companies like Facebook and Twitter and declare them as public commodities...but if we already believe that both of these big-tech platforms are controlled by the Deep State; then doesn't that mean they are already under government control?? Anyhoo -- why should conservatives be so pressed about Twitter if there are already other platforms who doesn't censor anyone??


Gettr is here -- in a short span of time it will be the largest social media platform in human history -- so why waste time and money on suing?? Defeat your big tech competition in the marketplace.

Gettr, the latest pro-Trump social network, is already a mess | TechCrunch

Well, that was fast. Just days after a Twitter clone from former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller launched, the new social network is already beset by

techcrunch.com

However, everyone knows that this is just another vehicle to fund-raise off of and line some pockets.....pretty similar to that Arizona audit; a money making grift that won't produce much but more disillusioned Trumpers who will be forced to go deeper into their conspiracy-bag to explain away reality....

Causes lose until they don't. Your argument would be akin to telling a gay person 30 years ago or a black person 60 years ago that they shouldn't pursue their rights because they wouldn't win.

He doesn't have to win this case in order to create a political will for change.

Lol...

Are you actually trying to tie Trump being kicked off of Twitter to Civil Rights?

Bawahahahahahhahahaha


The black person 60 years ago had every justification to pursue his rights because those rights were rightfully his and Constitutionally enshrined...

Can you tell me where in the Constitution does it say you can violate a private company's TOS that you agreed to??

Don't hold your breath.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Your argument would be akin to telling a gay person 30 years ago or a black person 60 years ago that they shouldn't pursue their rights because they wouldn't win.

No, that's stupid. Fighting for the right to be treated equally in the marketplace is not comparable to fighting for the right to have a private platform broadcast whatever you like.

 

[marvin martian]

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars

LOL

 

[whitehall]

Why sue the former president when you have a virtual zombie in the W.H.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As I understand it, if it can be proved that Big Tech is following the government's order to ban certain users, then that would be the government violating the First Amendment

And how much evidence do you think Trump's grifter lawyers have of this? I will venture ZERO.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars

LOL

Show me the part that talks about private companies??

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

You know what's funny....

Why would a "billionaire" be asking for donations to sue Twitter and Facebook? He is a billionaire, remember...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You know what's funny....

Why would a "billionaire" be asking for donations to sue Twitter and Facebook? He is a billionaire, remember...

They just don't get it! The government, run by Trump, censored supporters of Trump. Because they were censoring criticism of the government.

It makes sense, after a botched lobotomy.

 

[Faun]

Experts say Trump's social media lawsuits are likely doomed

The suits argue that Facebook and Twitter are "state actors," a claim unlikely to stand up in court.

www.axios.com

"Legal experts and First Amendment scholars say former President Donald Trump's class-action lawsuits announced Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter, Google, and their CEOs are unlikely to go far. Experts, suggests Trump's chief aim is to fire up his supporters and fundraise off of their anger over what they see as censorship by Big Tech. "This is not a lawsuit. It’s a fundraising grift," said Evan Greer, director of Fight for the Future, a progressive advocacy group that often targets Big Tech."

I mean, it would be awesome if government could just nationalize private companies like Facebook and Twitter and declare them as public commodities...but if we already believe that both of these big-tech platforms are controlled by the Deep State; then doesn't that mean they are already under government control?? Anyhoo -- why should conservatives be so pressed about Twitter if there are already other platforms who doesn't censor anyone??


Gettr is here -- in a short span of time it will be the largest social media platform in human history -- so why waste time and money on suing?? Defeat your big tech competition in the marketplace.

Gettr, the latest pro-Trump social network, is already a mess | TechCrunch

Well, that was fast. Just days after a Twitter clone from former Trump spokesperson Jason Miller launched, the new social network is already beset by

techcrunch.com

However, everyone knows that this is just another vehicle to fund-raise off of and line some pockets.....pretty similar to that Arizona audit; a money making grift that won't produce much but more disillusioned Trumpers who will be forced to go deeper into their conspiracy-bag to explain away reality....

Causes lose until they don't. Your argument would be akin to telling a gay person 30 years ago or a black person 60 years ago that they shouldn't pursue their rights because they wouldn't win.

He doesn't have to win this case in order to create a political will for change.

Great post. I'd like to see a victory here but if not, I'd like this to reach discovery phase. Big censorship could take some hits in discovery.

I'm with you on that. I'd love to see this make it to discovery. Trump might have to testify under oath about Insurrection Day.

 

[Faun]

As I understand it, if it can be proved that Big Tech is following the government's order to ban certain users, then that would be the government violating the First Amendment.

So maybe, just maybe, this lawsuit will eventually produce some kind of compromise down the line.

We know Quid Pro demanded the Monopoly ban Trump. Since the Monopoly acted on behalf of Xi's man this is a case of election tampering. The Monopoly acted to effect the outcome of a presidential election. The Monopoly is a trust that ensures no competition threatens it - as such it is a conspiracy. Ergo this is racketeering to alter an election.

The robber barons of the Monopoly should face prison time over this.

Oh, Fruitcake? Who was banned before the election?