So, everyone on the Left agrees that we are better off as a gun free nation, and that even though history proves armed societies at large are overall safer than unarmed societies in the long run?
And do all leftists agree that we are "safer" if no one is legally armed even though the number of people actually killed in "mass shootings" (while a tragedy) is statistically extremely small?
What will stop illegal arms from slipping across the border?
So this is to say, leftists who agree with the above are certain that government tyranny cannot evolve to the point of endangering millions of people (even though it just occurred in Venezuela) where the population was recently disarmed just before a dictator took over the nation.
LA Times: Venezuela’s raging homicide epidemic is going unrecorded
Op-Ed: Venezuela's raging homicide epidemic is going unrecorded
Most on the Left feel Donald Trump is the next Adolph Hitler.....and yet still scream for disarming American citizens? Does that make sense if they really believe that?
Or do you feel that only "assault weapons" need to be banned and taken? (What happens after that when shooters kill dozens with pistols?)
Is there no one on the left who can coherently and reasonably discuss how being a disarmed population given history and current events makes a society safer when even in Australia and the UK where gun control far exceeds that in the USA, shootings still occur (and are on the rise), knife attacks are a national crisis and robbery and assaults and rape are common?
Will America really be "safer", or is it a false hope? Will gun deaths be replaced by stabbings, clubbings and vehicles used in mass homicide? Will crime overall skyrocket?
Truth is, it is more likely that more deaths and more violence would be the result of disarming America. But few if any on the left dare to think it over.