Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 26,177
- 17,402
- 1,415
Great! I gave you a complete answer about, and definition of, the term "Regressive". I use it all the time, in PRECISELY the same context, yet I didn't expect you to accept it. That's okay.Nope!-- So the post immediately after yours --- that what you mean by "Regressive"?The Regressives are in charge of what is and is not racist. And all the other "-ists" and "-ophobes". The primary deciding factor is whether they sense political advantage.
The Regressive Left. The illiberal, authoritarian Regressive Left, home of PC, Identity Politics, and the destructive behaviors that motivated a REAL liberal (a Brit named Maajid Nawaz) to coin the term "Regressive Left" in the first place. (You can learn more about this brave Muslim man just by entering his name in the search box on YouTube™)
The Regressive Left -- group whose nasty, narcissistic, annoying, antagonistic behaviors above inspired the Great Pushback of 2016 that put Trump in office, despite those of us who voted against him.
There ya go! And thanks for asking!
.
Oh. Well you're changing your own term now --- you just said "Regressives". Still there right above.
So how would you label that post after yours? To refresh -- here it is:
Top 10 reasons why Obama is a racist:
he volunteered to work for Louis Farakahn
he went to Rev Wright's racist church for 20 years and never spoke out against the hate or walked out
he gave a speech to the New Black Panthers
he said if he had a son he would look like Trayvon Martin
he hosted the racist hate group BLM in the white house
he hosted the genocidal hate group Muslim Brotherhood in the White House
he said that the Democratic Party doesn’t want white voters from the South and rural areas
he said “Islam has always been part of America”
he quoted Rev Wright’s bigotry “white folk’s greed runs a world in need.”
he even called his own grandmother was “a typical white person”
That certainly qualifies as nasty, narcissistic (viz. self-infatuated boldface), annoying.and antagonistic, not to mention completely ignorant of the definition of his own terminology as it appoints itself arbiter of what's "racist".
Seems to fit all your criteria.
I'd say the post you provided is standard, boilerplate, right wing partisan ideologue talking point rhetoric, no more credible that the rhetoric from the other side.
I can see how important my opinion is to you, so there ya go.
.
Hey, I just grabbed the nearest perfect specimen, noting a delicious example of everything you described appeared immediately after you described it.
It's kinda weird that you then wanted to post-qualify it with "Left" so that the post would be excused. But thanks for this experience; I can now hang out my shingle as a dentist as I am hereby fully qualified to pull teeth.
No kidding, is the village idiot able to pull teeth...oh, I see, you mean your own teeth.