emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
This just in.
I was looking for a third reason to argue why voting for Trump was better than not.
I think I found it today.
3. First reason I found was that the choice of Supreme Court Justice would come from a list of more conservative Constitutionalists to balance the liberal bias. Even though I disagree with EITHER a left or right bias, and that to be Constitutional, no ruling should favor beliefs on either side, but should REJECT any law or dispute that belongs to the state or people; still, we need a Constitutionalist who will vote no to any further abuses of govt especially courts to decide private matters especially involving personal beliefs.
So that was the best reason given to me so far.
2. Secondly, since Clinton is so connected with party and legal interests that can buy their way out of being held accountable to the public and taxpayers, this is dangerous to put any more such people into office who put politics and party before Constitutional duty to public and office.
Trump is not a lawyer, not a friend to either party. Where he is not a friend to the Constitution either, the Republicans and Constitutionalists who are will smash his arguments and/or kick him out of office and he can't play around like Clinton and the Democrats do buying out the legal system.
The Clintons and the Obamas of the Democratic Party have shown they can even smash their own constituents for political benefit, and nobody can stop them because they have bought out the favor of the legal lobbies, corporate lobbies, and media that profits off these games and exploitation.
Trump does not have those connections, so he can be held to the Constitution by opponents while Clinton won't even work with Sanders and Blacks demanding accountability to the voter base from Democrat leadership.
1. And the third reason, to finish the list,
just came out today:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: ‘I can’t imagine what the country would be’ under President Trump
Ginsburg threatened to move to New Zealand if Trump got elected President.
Yay! My list is finished.
No matter how awful Trump is with sticking his feet in his mouth, saying things that can't possibly be justified by Constitutional means, that's why he can be held in check by conservatives and Constitutionalists who do enforce the laws.
People who don't want to do the work it takes to check Trump or govt can just move out of the way, or totally out of the country.
Because no matter who we elect, it is going to take work to keep them and govt in check.
If you want to be lazy and just let the legal and corporate lobbies decide who is going to get investigated and who is going to be let off the hook, vote for Clinton and more lawyers buying out the legal, legislative and media.
That's more work for the rest of us trying to clean up the messes made by corporate politics.
Trump knows the game, but he doesn't have the connections and dirt on him that the other people do running the game. So Trump can get his rump kicked if he steps out of line. And obviously the Republicans are happy to do so!
I was looking for a third reason to argue why voting for Trump was better than not.
I think I found it today.
3. First reason I found was that the choice of Supreme Court Justice would come from a list of more conservative Constitutionalists to balance the liberal bias. Even though I disagree with EITHER a left or right bias, and that to be Constitutional, no ruling should favor beliefs on either side, but should REJECT any law or dispute that belongs to the state or people; still, we need a Constitutionalist who will vote no to any further abuses of govt especially courts to decide private matters especially involving personal beliefs.
So that was the best reason given to me so far.
2. Secondly, since Clinton is so connected with party and legal interests that can buy their way out of being held accountable to the public and taxpayers, this is dangerous to put any more such people into office who put politics and party before Constitutional duty to public and office.
Trump is not a lawyer, not a friend to either party. Where he is not a friend to the Constitution either, the Republicans and Constitutionalists who are will smash his arguments and/or kick him out of office and he can't play around like Clinton and the Democrats do buying out the legal system.
The Clintons and the Obamas of the Democratic Party have shown they can even smash their own constituents for political benefit, and nobody can stop them because they have bought out the favor of the legal lobbies, corporate lobbies, and media that profits off these games and exploitation.
Trump does not have those connections, so he can be held to the Constitution by opponents while Clinton won't even work with Sanders and Blacks demanding accountability to the voter base from Democrat leadership.
1. And the third reason, to finish the list,
just came out today:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: ‘I can’t imagine what the country would be’ under President Trump
Ginsburg threatened to move to New Zealand if Trump got elected President.
Yay! My list is finished.
No matter how awful Trump is with sticking his feet in his mouth, saying things that can't possibly be justified by Constitutional means, that's why he can be held in check by conservatives and Constitutionalists who do enforce the laws.
People who don't want to do the work it takes to check Trump or govt can just move out of the way, or totally out of the country.
Because no matter who we elect, it is going to take work to keep them and govt in check.
If you want to be lazy and just let the legal and corporate lobbies decide who is going to get investigated and who is going to be let off the hook, vote for Clinton and more lawyers buying out the legal, legislative and media.
That's more work for the rest of us trying to clean up the messes made by corporate politics.
Trump knows the game, but he doesn't have the connections and dirt on him that the other people do running the game. So Trump can get his rump kicked if he steps out of line. And obviously the Republicans are happy to do so!
