Why Trump's many scandals simply don't resonate with the American people.

[ding]

You are accountable for everything you do.

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

socialism provides for social justice, not capital justice; Only capitalism, does that.

No. Socialism is inherently evil. There is no good or justice or mercy in socialism.

 

[easyt65]

The level of hypocrisy and the unparalleled silence from the Left during their own members' scandals has overwhelmed those on the right to the point where nothing the Left says matters. If the Left had ever demonstrated outrage and non-acceptance of their own party members' scandalous and criminal acts then maybe someone would listen to them when they complain about those on the right. Since they never did / have no one does.

At some point it is imperative for everyone to shed the partisan brainwashing, begin to be Americans first, and begin to administer the same levels of scrutiny - and condemnation - for ALL politicians, not just those NOT in their own party.

 

[danielpalos]

subjectively difinitive or objectively difinitive.

Outcomes.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

Moral values are subjective. Why do you believe they aren't?

Outcomes

outcomes can also be subjective, just ask the fantastical, right wing.

No, outcomes are definitive.

subjectively definitive or objectively definitive.

morals are subjective.

 

[danielpalos]

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

socialism provides for social justice, not capital justice; Only capitalism, does that.

No. Socialism is inherently evil. There is no good or justice or mercy in socialism.

morals are subjective; socialism cannot be, evil.

 

[ding]

subjectively difinitive or objectively difinitive.

Outcomes.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

Moral values are subjective. Why do you believe they aren't?

Outcomes

outcomes can also be subjective, just ask the fantastical, right wing.

No, outcomes are definitive.

subjectively definitive or objectively definitive.

morals are subjective.

Logic precludes that morals are subjective. For any given thing there will always be an upward bounding standard; one which has no higher standard. That is the absolute moral. Do you need for me to prove this to you?

 

[ding]

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

socialism provides for social justice, not capital justice; Only capitalism, does that.

No. Socialism is inherently evil. There is no good or justice or mercy in socialism.

morals are subjective; socialism cannot be, evil.

Socialism is evil because it is secretive in nature, it defies examination and offers no clear socialism of socialism. Therefore, socialism is based on deceit. As such, socialism is inherently evil.

 

[danielpalos]

subjectively difinitive or objectively difinitive.

Outcomes.

Moral values are subjective. Why do you believe they aren't?

Outcomes

outcomes can also be subjective, just ask the fantastical, right wing.

No, outcomes are definitive.

subjectively definitive or objectively definitive.

morals are subjective.

Logic precludes that morals are subjective. For any given thing there will always be an upward bounding standard; one which has no higher standard. That is the absolute moral. Do you need for me to prove this to you?

morals are subjective; or, we would Only have one religion.