Why Trump Won’t Win

Look at the avatar punk. It's me looking at you.

No it's not.

It's some grainy photo you found of a black dude online.

Besides, the most racist thing I could possibly do would be to be intimidated by some obscure "black dude photo" on the internet.

But I know you don't comprehend that.

Karen. ;)
 
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm
You didn't beat anything.

Right? That's not your blood, it's your boy friends menstrual ooze from stuffing a frozen Tomato paste plug up his azz.

Tax cuts were irrelevant during the pandemic.

People keeping more of their earned money is irrelevant? Sound like time for Mort...

A forty(40) year old man has his self a small bidness. He is not a corporation, he chooses, right or wrong, to pay his taxes individually. There are a LOT of small bidnesses out there like this. Gonna call our guy Mort. Mort has a little machine shop. Mort the Machinest, Machinest Mort. Mort is single and makes exactly $200k/year. Mort is in the highest tax bracket, right now Mort pays $70k a year in income taxes. Slowbama, the half-breed stuttering muslim wants to raise taxes on Mort, as Mort doesn't pay his fair share. If Slow gets his way Mort will pay $79.2k in income taxes. Mort employs three dudes, Tom, skeptic and Harry in Mort's Machine Shop. Each of these guys makes $50K/year. Each of these guys pays $7.5k in taxes/year. Grand total of income taxes paid by everyone at Mort's Machine Shop is $95.2k/year. Mort's Machine shop make a profit of $400k/year, hence the saleries. If Mort has to buy sumpin, that comes outta Mort's salery. Every time skeptic breaks a bit, cause skeptic is a friggin moron, Mort has to replace that bit outta his own salery. A bit can easily cost a grand. Mort understands that he has to pay for these things, Mort is a bidnessman, Mort is a conservative, a Libertarian, in fact, a Perfect Libertrain, a consequential Libertarian, a Neil Boortz Libertarian, a teacher Libertarian, and Mort does not bemoan his poor self when he has to replace a skeptic destroyed bit, Mort assumes the risks. The cost of doing bidness. This risk/reward American/capitalist system is why Mort is in the highest tax bracket. Mort lives in a nice house, dirve a nice truck that he also uses for his bidness. Mort belongs to a semi-upper class country club. Mort works 60-80 hours a week and Mort feels that his hard work and risk entitles his self to some perks. Who is say that he doen't deserve these things? So Mort's bidness is doing okay, he's paying the bills, paying the taxes, paying the saleries for Tom, skeptic and Harry, he's paying for is idiot employee sleptic's bit destroying behavior. Mort's Machine Shop is standing pat at a $400k/year profit. But Mort is greedy. Mort wants to expand. Mort plays golf with Mitt, Mitt has kitchen sink assembly bidness. Mitt buys a certain part for one of his sinks from a black guy, said black guy, Leroy, is stiffing Mitt on the price of the part. Now, said part can't be manufactured by Mort, Mort needs a certain machine to fabricate this part and Mort ain't got it. This machine costs $9.2k. Mort can decide to invest in Mort's Machine Shop but Mort likes his lifestyle and Mort is worried that Slow is gonna raise Mort's personnel income taxes/year by, you guessed it, $9.2k. Mort is uncertain of his finacial future expences cause Slow is dicking around with the economy, not doing as a President should do and lettin everyne know what is coming down the pike. Giving the bidnessman certainty is not high on Slow's to do list. Personally, Mort the Machinest feels that Slow is doing his upmost to destroy capitalism so that he can say "see, capitalism doens't work, lettuce try socialism/communism/Marxism/statism", but that is neither here nor there. Now, dues at Mort's country club cost/year, you guessed it, $9.2k/year. Like I said, Mort likes his greedy, capitalist fueled lifestyle. Under Slow's plan Mort is not gonna give up his Sunday golf outing with Mitt to expand his bidness. Mitt's just gonna have to do what Mitt always does, fire some people and outsource to the Chinese. Greedy little Mitt. All of a sudden Mort hears that there is a guy running again Slow that will not raise Mort's taxes. (We gonna put aside that said guy actually want to LOWER Mort's taxes if elected). Word on the street is that this guy is 5/4 in favour of gettin elected. Mort the Machinest rolls the die and buys his new machine that will get him a new contract with Mitt the sink maker. Mort now has more work that he can handle, so he has to hire a new guy, Marchimedes. Bidness is good, matter of fact it's so good Mort give his self a HUGE raise. He also gives all his employees a huge raise. Mort now pays himself $300k/year, and his now four(4) employees now all make $75k/years. Mort's machine Shop now pays in federal income taxes $230k/year. Mort's Machine Shop used to pay $95.2k/year. Remember, Mort's employees have jumped up a tax bracket so they now pay a higher percentage. Is that fair? Same guys, same job, but that is neither here not there. This is called trickle down economics. Yes, Lucy, there are ramifications to raising taxes on the so-called rich. Also, Mort gets a general good feeling from the local community cause he employs the bit destroying retard skeptic. Remember, now, that Mort, Tom, skeptic, Harry and Marchimedes also now all pay more into SSI, state/local taxes, sales taxes, they all get more betterer rides, they spend more on the local economy, friggin skeptic now pays his retard nephew, dano bivins to mow his lawn, who in turn takes said lawn cash and and buys gum to mix with his lead paint chips, Tom starts seeing the local whore, Isabel, twice the week now, Harry smoke more weed, which makes him buy more Nintendo games and Marchimedes self publishes a book titled "How to build a pyramid", wins the Nobel prize for just being able to point out the friggin obvious and takes the ensuing cash and buys some dog and pony show internet political debate web site and makes lowrent admin who is so busy banning KingBlam that he forgets to eat or smoke for weeks at time and turns out to live to be 127 years old and crap I grow bored.

Those names are from another web site though I can change them to reflect this sites pack of idiots. Tax cuts spur American economic growth. Or do I have to copy/paste from Treasaury.gov?

And trump cut taxes during economic growth, then proceeded to spend money like a rich girl in a mall,

Can't argue with you there. See how fi(kin easy it is to admit when my side fu(ks it up? Now you try it. Ah but no SlowJoeBiden had a wonderful with drawl in Afghanistan. The border is secure. Paying WAY more for energy is good for the American poor. San Fransisco homelessness is the fault of Republicans. China are the good guys. (SlowJoe said that.) I know we said last time Trump was gonna start WWIII and he would assassinate his opponents but THIS time we're right about that...

which created a record deficit.

They're always record deficits. Wonder what SlowJoe's final tally will be? Or do I have to copy/paste from Treasaury.gov?

His trade war fail with China started prices rising,

Show your work. And we needed a trade war with China. or was it okay with you that we put a 2.5% tarrif on their vehicles and they put a 20% tarrif on ours?

and border crossings were at 40 year lows when trump took office. By the time he left, we had a border crisis.

exploding head 1.2.png
 
Your link is pre-covid figures? Holy $h!t there's not even posts between our posts. I ask for pre-covid figures and you show me 2023? What the fu(k kinda retard are you? Lemme type real slow sos you understand. Go find $h!t like the GDP for the last decade. That is the leading economic indicator, not how many of your boy friends toes you can stick in your mouth. Do the same for unemployment or if you want the real figure on working the job participation rate. Inflation, the consumer price index, trade balances, interest rates, how much did you over pay for a muffler? Again. Fu(k this site is full of ignorant knuckle draggers.
One of the biggest themes of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address — and one of the biggest themes of his reelection campaign — is that he inherited a weak economy from President Barack Obama and turned it into a strong economy by implementing his own policies.

We looked at 15 common economic statistics, from unemployment rates to growth in gross domestic product to poverty, foreclosures, and bank failures.

They cover the period of the Great Recession until today. Where possible, we’ve highlighted periods under a Republican president in red and periods under a Democratic president in blue.

The bottom line: For virtually each of these measurements, we found that the trend lines continued almost seamlessly from the second half of Obama’s presidency into the first three years of Trump’s tenure. Trump’s claim that he turned around a failing economy is wrong.



Data show Trump didn't 'build' a great economy. He inherited it.​

President Donald Trump’s campaign speeches can careen into many topics, but his primary appeal continues to be that he built “the greatest economy that we've had in our history” before the COVID-19 pandemic and he can do it again. The latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows he has an edge with voters on that issue and the Trump economy is likely to be a big topic this week at the Republican convention.

But the real story of the Trump economy, and the president’s role in building it, is not so simple. If you compare key economic indicators from Barack Obama’s second term in office to the first three years of Trump’s time (that is, before the pandemic hit), the data show a continuation of trends, not a dramatic shift. It suggests Trump didn’t build something new; rather he inherited a pretty good situation.

Start with the broadest measure of economic health, gross domestic product. In 2016, Trump said he was unhappy that the country’s economic growth rate was under 3 percent a year. Trump said he thought the economy could grow at better-than-4-percent annual rate.

But the numbers show that average quarterly economic growth under Trump, 2.5 percent, was almost exactly what it was under Obama in the second term, 2.4 percent.

Other than the overall similarity, two things jump out of those numbers. First, Trump didn’t get near his 4 percent figure. Second, the growth that began in Obama’s second term and essentially continued under Trump was enough to create an economy that even Trump believes was great.



Pick your knuckles up junior. You just don't get to come in here, spew factless drivel and claim you're winning something.



 
One of the biggest themes of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address — and one of the biggest themes of his reelection campaign — is that he inherited a weak economy from President Barack Obama and turned it into a strong economy by implementing his own policies.

We looked at 15 common economic statistics, from unemployment rates to growth in gross domestic product to poverty, foreclosures, and bank failures.

They cover the period of the Great Recession until today. Where possible, we’ve highlighted periods under a Republican president in red and periods under a Democratic president in blue.

The bottom line: For virtually each of these measurements, we found that the trend lines continued almost seamlessly from the second half of Obama’s presidency into the first three years of Trump’s tenure. Trump’s claim that he turned around a failing economy is wrong.



Data show Trump didn't 'build' a great economy. He inherited it.​

President Donald Trump’s campaign speeches can careen into many topics, but his primary appeal continues to be that he built “the greatest economy that we've had in our history” before the COVID-19 pandemic and he can do it again. The latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows he has an edge with voters on that issue and the Trump economy is likely to be a big topic this week at the Republican convention.

But the real story of the Trump economy, and the president’s role in building it, is not so simple. If you compare key economic indicators from Barack Obama’s second term in office to the first three years of Trump’s time (that is, before the pandemic hit), the data show a continuation of trends, not a dramatic shift. It suggests Trump didn’t build something new; rather he inherited a pretty good situation.

Start with the broadest measure of economic health, gross domestic product. In 2016, Trump said he was unhappy that the country’s economic growth rate was under 3 percent a year. Trump said he thought the economy could grow at better-than-4-percent annual rate.

But the numbers show that average quarterly economic growth under Trump, 2.5 percent, was almost exactly what it was under Obama in the second term, 2.4 percent.

Other than the overall similarity, two things jump out of those numbers. First, Trump didn’t get near his 4 percent figure. Second, the growth that began in Obama’s second term and essentially continued under Trump was enough to create an economy that even Trump believes was great.



Pick your knuckles up junior. You just don't get to come in here, spew factless drivel and claim you're winning something.

Blah blah blah.


A lengthy post nobody will ready by some white Karen who has a black avatar.

What a racist.
 
No it's not.

It's some grainy photo you found of a black dude online.

Besides, the most racist thing I could possibly do would be to be intimidated by some obscure "black dude photo" on the internet.

But I know you don't comprehend that.

Karen. ;)
Nah, it's me and I am not concerned about you being intimidated or not. You have to be mentally ill to believe I'm white trying to pretend to be black. WTF for? To take ridicule from low forehead pricks like you? Ha!
 
Republicans here keep talking about aa Trump victory and the first primary has not been held. You guys seem to think that when the campaign starts the mindless tweets from trump cult members are going to be the only informattion. Trump is about to get crushed by organizations who will run ads blasting his presidency, and all the stuff has has talked in his rallies is going to be played as well. We will be reminded of 1-6, and then there will be videos about the trials.

The game his not started yet and Trump supporters are declaring victory. But:

Why Trump Won’t Win​

Over the past few weeks, warnings about the threat posed by Donald Trump’s potential reelection have grown louder, including in a series of articles in The Atlantic. This alarm-raising is justified and appropriate, given the looming danger of authoritarianism in American politics. But amid all of the worrying, we might be losing sight of the most important fact: Trump’s chances of winning are slim.

Some look at Trump’s long list of flaws and understandably see reasons to worry about him winning. I see reasons to think he almost certainly won’t.

Trump’s flaws look far worse today than they did eight years ago. To take one example that should concern conservative voters: his behavior toward and views of service members.

Similarly, in 2016, Trump’s campaign was briefly rocked by the Access Hollywood videotape in which he boasted about grabbing women by the genitalia. He survived, in large part because many voters chose to accept his comments as “locker room” bluster. Several women accused him of sexual misconduct, but Trump fended off their allegations too. Now he has been held civilly liable by a New York jury for sexually abusing the advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. A federal judge has said that the jury concluded that what Trump did to Carroll was rape in the common sense of the term. Some Americans will shrug that off, but many won’t be able to.


He has a coin flip's chance of winning--as does anyone who runs for President with a D or an R next to their name.
 
One... great.

Found some $h!t somebody else wrote on the internet, eh? Yea, you're a fu(kin genius. I can fu(k that stupid $h!t up but why bother cause you won't take it personally.

Pick your knuckles up junior.

Fu(k this site is full of ignorant knuckle draggers.

Come up with your own insults, azzhole.

You just don't get to come in here

The fu(k I don't.

, spew factless drivel and claim you're winning something.

The bluster is strong with this one.

Go find $h!t like the GDP for the last decade. That is the leading economic indicator, not how many of your boy friends toes you can stick in your mouth. Do the same for unemployment or if you want the real figure on working the job participation rate. Inflation, the consumer price index, trade balances, interest rates, how much did you over pay for a muffler?

 

Donald Trump Campaign Stung by Direct Evidence Revealed in Court​

Republicans in Michigan testified in a Lansing court that Donald Trump's campaign was directly involved with putting together a team to create a false certificate that said he won the 2020 presidential election.

Former Michigan Republican Party Communications Director Tony Zammit said he thought people such as Trump lawyer Shawn Flynn had taken advantage of people who ended up signing the document.

"I thought they were going along with what the lawyers were telling them," he said in a preliminary hearing Thursday, according to The Detroit News. Zammit said the meeting took place on December 14.

Zammit's testimony may make it more difficult to prove that the 16 signatories had full knowledge of what they were doing.

"Clearly, they're relying on lawyers from the Trump campaign that are the ones that are telling them what to do," said Paul Stablein, lawyer for charged Republican elector Amy Facchinello, according to the Detroit News.

 

Donald Trump Campaign Stung by Direct Evidence Revealed in Court​


Oh look.

Another white Karen soccer mom triggered by Trump after overdosing on CNN.

Except this one is so racist she put a black dude as her avatar.

Absolutely disgraceful.
 
He has a coin flip's chance of winning--as does anyone who runs for President with a D or an R next to their name.
I'm not so sure it will be that way in November.
 

Forum List

Back
Top