jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,344
- 34,503
- 2,180
Planted documents?Read the warrant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Planted documents?Read the warrant.
Nope raid was firstBecause Trump received a grand jury subpoena for documents and he obstructed justice by causing his lawyers to lie about his compliance with that subpoena.
Not that complicated.
Subpoena was issued May 11, 2022. Search warrant was issued August 5, 2022.Nope raid was first
Jc just lies out of habitSubpoena was issued May 11, 2022. Search warrant was issued August 5, 2022.
And that somehow relieves him of the responsibility of insecurely storing and sharing confidential documents that HE NEVER HAD AUTHORITY TO POSSESS AT ALL? You're a moron.
See, you think time is linear. So narrow minded.Jc just lies out of habit
And?Subpoena was issued May 11, 2022. Search warrant was issued August 5, 2022.
Subpoena was before the raid. You had it backwards. Sorry I didn’t think I had to explain that May comes before August every year.And?
Folks call trump a Felon because of a liberal judge and demand they haven't gone after the Democrats. This is why Harris-led office, ATF stonewalling probe into 'collusion' with anti-gun group lawsuit: House Oversight chair
Colmes listed all the evidence that made Hillary quality, then claim she didn't have intent because she was too stupid to know she was violating the law. She graduated from Harvard, and claims she didn't know what destruction of evidence or obstruction of evidence was. She was Secretary of State and claims she didn't know the rules when handling Classified documents were. He wouldn't do that if Hillary was a Republican.
The rules for Republicans are different from the rules for Democrats.
Hey imbecile, thanks for showing you know nothingSubpoena was before the raid. You had it backwards. Sorry I didn’t think I had to explain that May comes before August every year.
bit we must no9t fight back, or even complain. that would be "class warfare" or "cultural marxism" or "woke"Republicans have crashed the US economy 3 times in the past 40 years, enriching the top 10%, and impoverishing the working and middle class.
The Republican Party has created an economic system where all wealth and income goes to the top 10% of Americans and corporations, and the rest of the population are being impoverished by the corporate state.
And you keep electing Republicans.
bit we must no9t fight back, or even complain. that would be "class warfare" or "cultural marxism" or "woke"
Allowing taxpayers to keep more of their money is not giving them money. Giving producers money, as you say, allows them to use the money to produce more. Giving to the needy feeds the bottomless pit of need. No matter how much you give them, they still need more. Take all the money from a rich person and give it to a poor person, and 10 years later the rich person is rich again, and the poor person is poor again. The reason a poor person is poor may not be due to laziness, but it is due to bad habits. For example, buying lottery tickets instead of investing it in the stock market keeps you poor. Investing in yourself improving job skills making yourself more valuable to employers makes you rich. You can teach yourself, on the internet, anything the colleges teach, then you can use a job link like Linked In to take assessments proving your ability and employers will go there and hire you based on those assessments not caring what degree you have.It’s the notion that giving money to people who need it is wrong, but giving taxpayer dollars to big privately owned corporations who don’t need the money, helps the American people, that makes me shake my head.
The belief that poor people are poor, because they’re lazy and don’t work hard enough and not because the economy, the tax code and the labour laws make it all but impossible for them to improve their status, is a core Republican principle.
depends on the axis,See, you think time is linear. So narrow minded.
still fake news disinformation as always Canadian, I expect no less from you!It’s the notion that giving money to people who need it is wrong, but giving taxpayer dollars to big privately owned corporations who don’t need the money, helps the American people, that makes me shake my head.
The belief that poor people are poor, because they’re lazy and don’t work hard enough and not because the economy, the tax code and the labour laws make it all but impossible for them to improve their status, is a core Republican principle.
Allowing taxpayers to keep more of their money is not giving them money. Giving producers money, as you say, allows them to use the money to produce more. Giving to the needy feeds the bottomless pit of need. No matter how much you give them, they still need more. Take all the money from a rich person and give it to a poor person, and 10 years later the rich person is rich again, and the poor person is poor again. The reason a poor person is poor may not be due to laziness, but it is due to bad habits. For example, buying lottery tickets instead of investing it in the stock market keeps you poor. Investing in yourself improving job skills making yourself more valuable to employers makes you rich. You can teach yourself, on the internet, anything the colleges teach, then you can use a job link like Linked In to take assessments proving your ability and employers will go there and hire you based on those assessments not caring what degree you have.
still fake news disinformation as always Canadian, I expect no less from you!
so you don't like your country? I told you it was disinformation. You can't provide any evidence.Still got nothing but insults???? When you can't refute the facts, you attack the poster.
Folks call trump a Felon because of a liberal judge and demand they haven't gone after the Democrats. This is why Harris-led office, ATF stonewalling probe into 'collusion' with anti-gun group lawsuit: House Oversight chair
Colmes listed all the evidence that made Hillary quality, then claim she didn't have intent because she was too stupid to know she was violating the law. She graduated from Harvard, and claims she didn't know what destruction of evidence or obstruction of evidence was. She was Secretary of State and claims she didn't know the rules when handling Classified documents were. He wouldn't do that if Hillary was a Republican.
The rules for Republicans are different from the rules for Democrats.