Trying to change the subject?
Not at all.... are you not following? I drew a very clear distinction between your fallacy and the explicitly stated intent of genocide in the name of religion. And I only felt compelled to do so, due to your dishonest effort to the contrary. What looks like "changing the subject" to you is a clear and concise refutation of your specious nonsense, which is as predictable as the sunrise.
I think you're problem is that you think that, when people point out the vile ends that religion can and does produce, you take it as an indictment of all religion. It is not. You set yourself up for such criticism, though, when you deal in charlatan's generalities to the other end of the spectrum.
I was even nice enough to clearly delineate what I see as the reason these vile ends arise: the lack of any good mechanism for litigating to the truth of religious beliefs, coupled with the fact that religious beliefs often cannot co-exist in the same universe (i.e., they are contradictory)
This isn't brain surgery, dude. this is simple stuff! Ultimately, theology , as a whole, is a complete failure for finding the truth of anything, save for the historical opinions of human beings.