Why the "family unit" should be destroyed

Status
Not open for further replies.

Midnight FM

Gold Member
Joined
May 4, 2025
Messages
797
Reaction score
349
Points
143
Basically, this would be superior to the "family unit".

*Biological parents would no longer be granted legal custody of children upon their birth. Children would be raised by the state, and the most competent and educated members of society would be their mentors.

*The institution of marriage would be abolished. People would choose their partners, and seek new ones as they see fit. And since they wouldn't have to bother wasting their time raising children, there would not be pressure to choose a partner out of material necessity. Rather, they would be free to choose the partner they most desire. Which would improve quality of life and self-actualization.
 
Basically, this would be superior to the "family unit".

*Biological parents would no longer be granted legal custody of children upon their birth. Children would be raised by the state, and the most competent and educated members of society would be their mentors.

*The institution of marriage would be abolished. People would choose their partners, and seek new ones as they see fit. And since they wouldn't have to bother wasting their time raising children, there would not be pressure to choose a partner out of material necessity. Rather, they would be free to choose the partner they most desire. Which would improve quality of life and self-actualization.

Define self actualization.
 
Basically, this would be superior to the "family unit".

*Biological parents would no longer be granted legal custody of children upon their birth. Children would be raised by the state, and the most competent and educated members of society would be their mentors.

*The institution of marriage would be abolished. People would choose their partners, and seek new ones as they see fit. And since they wouldn't have to bother wasting their time raising children, there would not be pressure to choose a partner out of material necessity. Rather, they would be free to choose the partner they most desire. Which would improve quality of life and self-actualization.
The two parent family is the foundation of a stable society and is vital for normal/optimal child development.


Single mothers overall have a 28 percent poverty rate.* (see Figure 5) The following sections highlight various public assistance programs meant to help low-income single mothers.
 
The two parent family is the foundation of a stable society and is vital for normal/optimal child development.


Single mothers overall have a 28 percent poverty rate.* (see Figure 5) The following sections highlight various public assistance programs meant to help low-income single mothers.


He knows that. That is why he wants to destroy it, it is part of destroying western civilization.

He's clearly some flavor of commie.
 
Basically, this would be superior to the "family unit".

*Biological parents would no longer be granted legal custody of children upon their birth. Children would be raised by the state, and the most competent and educated members of society would be their mentors.

*The institution of marriage would be abolished. People would choose their partners, and seek new ones as they see fit. And since they wouldn't have to bother wasting their time raising children, there would not be pressure to choose a partner out of material necessity. Rather, they would be free to choose the partner they most desire. Which would improve quality of life and self-actualization.
We already have this dolt.

It's called Foster care.

:auiqs.jpg:

And no, no one likes it, especially the children.
 
He knows that. That is why he wants to destroy it, it is part of destroying western civilization.

He's clearly some flavor of commie.
The Left at least tries to be clever about it by whining and bitching about how terrible the Patriarchal family is, as if the male aspect is the evil within society.

Now the loons don't want children to even have a female parent.

:spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner:
 
The Left at least tries to be clever about it by whining and bitching about how terrible the Patriarchal family is, as if the male aspect is the evil within society.

Now the loons don't want children to even have a female parent.

:spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner:
What we have now are millions of fat women with blue hair in anxiety meds.
 
Basically, this would be superior to the "family unit".

*Biological parents would no longer be granted legal custody of children upon their birth. Children would be raised by the state, and the most competent and educated members of society would be their mentors.

*The institution of marriage would be abolished. People would choose their partners, and seek new ones as they see fit. And since they wouldn't have to bother wasting their time raising children, there would not be pressure to choose a partner out of material necessity. Rather, they would be free to choose the partner they most desire. Which would improve quality of life and self-actualization.
That would be a society I could not agree to live in and would fight vehemently and violent against. The nuclear family has been the core component of society for millennia. Government is neither fit to nor capable of replacing it.
 
Sounds like a weird Netflix series called “Imagine”.

Imagine no familes.

Stupid.
 
Basically, this would be superior to the "family unit".

*Biological parents would no longer be granted legal custody of children upon their birth. Children would be raised by the state, and the most competent and educated members of society would be their mentors.

*The institution of marriage would be abolished. People would choose their partners, and seek new ones as they see fit. And since they wouldn't have to bother wasting their time raising children, there would not be pressure to choose a partner out of material necessity. Rather, they would be free to choose the partner they most desire. Which would improve quality of life and self-actualization.

Wow, stupidest thread ever.
 
Wow, stupidest thread ever.
Not really.

It is a Left-wing dream for the government to somehow strip all parental control of their children to the state so that the state can mold them anyway they desire.

The lust for power in human beings is insatiable and infinite.

It's a character flaw thingy as we should only expect more of this crap.
 
The two parent family is the foundation of a stable society and is vital for normal/optimal child development.
The traditional family has always been multiple generations living together. We've moved away from that and it has hurt our children.
 
The traditional family has always been multiple generations living together. We've moved away from that and it has hurt our children.
Thats not such a great idea especially when a serious disease breaks out. The welfare state and feminism both hurt the two parent nuclear family as well as democrats who advocate for single mothers. The gender absurdity is also an attack on the family. Thats all being rejected after Biden tried to shove it down our throats
 
15th post
The traditional family has always been multiple generations living together. We've moved away from that and it has hurt our children.
My whole family doesn't live together, but we ALL live no more than a 10-minute drive of each other. At least on my side.
 
Link for the OP?

Hitler famously stated, "When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side,’ I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already. You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community."

"Social policy in Nazi Germany (BBC)
Gotta be some hyper-Left-wing or hyper-Right-wing nut-case pushing such proposals...

Not a snowball's-chance-in-hell that they'll be implemented in a strong, open and free democratic society...
 
Last edited:
why dont you go find this society and then move there.....
I'm being a devil's advocate to some extent.

But the point is, there's no requirement to become a parent other than to have functioning sex organs. Even earning a driver's license requires more responsibility.

This is why, in another thread, I proposed that people be required to obtain a parenting license before being allowed to have children.
 
Thats not such a great idea especially when a serious disease breaks out. The welfare state and feminism both hurt the two parent nuclear family as well as democrats who advocate for single mothers. The gender absurdity is also an attack on the family. Thats all being rejected after Biden tried to shove it down our throats

It takes two people working full time to barely hang on. If you want the traditional family back you had better
1) increase wages across the board for lower and middle class workers
2) increase mat e rnity and paternity leave...bigly
3) provide assistance $ for daycare

Thats just the start. Will it happen? Not a chance because the corporate heads will be against it. So the trend isnt going away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom