Chart in 125 is upside down, the negative in red and the positive in black
Damn it man. What will we do now. The numbers are trending up. Looks like two points so far. If this continues, why what a disaster it would be right?
Here are the real numbers in an easier to understand format.
Gallup 11/27 - 11/29 1500 A 36 57 -21
Rasmussen Reports 11/27 - 11/29 1500 LV 42 56 -14
Economist/YouGov 11/26 - 11/28 1319 RV 43 53 -10
Reuters/Ipsos 11/24 - 11/28 1969 A 38 57 -19
Quinnipiac 11/15 - 11/20 1415 RV 38 55 -17
NPR/PBS/Marist 11/13 - 11/15 802 RV 42 54 -12
Harvard-Harris 11/11 - 11/14 2350 RV 41 59 -18
CNN 11/2 - 11/5 RV 38 57 -19
[/QUOTE]
Want to know why you lost the election in 2016? That attitude right there. The Solid Blue Wall. The unassailable rampart that was the Rustbelt states would see Hillary into the White House. Those solid Democratic Voters, the heartland that mattered. Those awesome folks went from Union Hero’s in the morning to idiotic racist sexist homophobic scum before the sun rose again.
Stop ignoring the populist issues, and stop calling the voters you NEED idiots.
The false assumption on your part is that your idea of America is what won the election. You do not represent the heartland. In rejecting HRC, the heartland did not accept your neo-fascist alt right philosophy.
Jake, you need to put the broad brush down, and try to think for yourself. It would be a new experience, I admit, but try it. You might like it.
The issues that won the election for Trump were thus. A) Hillary was a terrible candidate. This was hoped to be offset by the famed Blue Wall, which crumbled, and how bad a candidate Trump was. But in head to head polling, Hillary did better against Trump than she did any other candidate except Jeb.
B) Trade. A majority of people supposedly supported the TPP. But both Trump and Hillary were against it. The only problem was that Hillary helped negotiate it, and in her book called it the Gold Standard of trade deals. Then she edited her book to take that out, but it had already been published. Just think of this my friend. If Hillary had done one of two things, she might have been President on this issue. She could have remained consistent on the TPP, she could have avoided crowing about how awesome she was.
People, especially those in the Rust Belt, were sick of watching their manufacturing jobs go to Mexico. Trump was smart enough to play up the news where more factories were announcing the move to Mexico as the campaign progressed. NAFTA has cost more than a million manufacturing jobs, a million households where voters are not likely to be supportive of more trade deals. A million families who want the old ones gone. Even if it is just two people in each house, that is a hell of a lot of votes in jeopardy over one issue don’t you think?
C) Border Security. The people complaining that we are racist for wanting to secure our borders all live behind fences, which supposedly don’t work. But this issue has been one that has hurt politicians before. When W. was President we saw much the same response, people sent bricks to Congress if you have forgotten that little kerfluffle. Bush tried to call them Racists, which only served to fire up the opponents more. I know, I sent a brick after they called us racists for wanting for the nation what they had for their homes. Hypocrisy does not sell well with the voting public.
I should note, that calling those who wish to stop ILLEGAL immigration racists is counterproductive. Remember when NBC sent plants into a NASCAR event to see if they could film some anti Muslim sentiment among the Rednecks? It bombed, terribly. The fans didn’t care if you were wearing Muslim garb.
NASCAR SMACKS DOWN NBC
But the rhetoric continued that racism was rampant among the fans, despite evidence.
D) Guns. Gun makers probably wanted Hillary elected more than you did. Hillary was going to continue the Obama rhetoric on guns, which would keep sales sky high. Many people have commented that Obama was one of the best gun salesmen in history. Now, with Trump in charge, sales have fallen off, badly. Remington Arms is in danger of going into bankruptcy, or flat out defaulting. A mere year since the election, and one of the nations larges manufacturers of firearms is in danger of going under. I’m betting that they are funding the Democrats for the midterms to the limit of each employees ability in the hopes they can again get some anti-gun threats going.
But the voters on the other hand don’t want the Gun grabbers to win. I mentioned above that one of the populist issues that Democrats could embrace is legalization of Marijuana. 60% of the people support it. Now, Guns are the same sort of passionately held belief. If the Democrats would throw the anti gun crap onto the rubbish pile of history they could start making inroads with those rural voters and more conservative voters who would then vote for them. About 40% of the voters support an assault weapons ban. That is after Las Vegas man. If you can’t get above 50% support after a mass shooting, you don’t have a prayer of winning on the issue.
No matter who won, some issues I cared about were going to suffer. If Hillary had won, then Trade was going to suffer, more trade deals and more lost manufacturing with the resulting loss of middle class blue collar jobs. If Trump won, I was going to lose ground on another issue I cared about, reform and accountability for the police. I am absolutely opposed to militarization of the police.
Now, I don’t know if that’s alt right. I hope not. Because if that is now the definition of alt right, then the Democrats are so far gone that they will never recover. I’ve said many times, I voted for Obama. I’ve voted Democrat. I would not vote for Hillary no matter what. When I saw the corruption running amok in the DNC, I refused to vote for any Democrat. But nothing could be allowed to threaten the coronation.