WinterBorn
Diamond Member
not at all,, just dont have time for peoplle that play word games,,
Don't have time? LMAO!! You have been in the thread, arguing semantics and trivial details instead of the topic for how long??
Looks like you have time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not at all,, just dont have time for peoplle that play word games,,
Apparently you forgot about Korea and Vietnam. But liberals like you probably opposed us fighting against communists.As long as men have been making the decisions to kill one another over stupid shit, the world has gone to hell in a handbasket. The years since WWII have been the longest, period of peace and prosperity in European history. When women were voting.
Women are controlled by their hormones.Women vote overwhelmingly dem. On the surface it sounds crazy not having women vote. But that is the score. Women vote = dem rule.
can you read??
those are just two of the factors,,
not when those certian people are the ones with skin in the game,,
women with no threat of draft and others that live off the government dont have skin in the game,,
I was talking about two different people,,Yep, I can read just fine. You said
So women with no threat of draft have no skin in the game, seeming to indicate that only those who do have the threat of the draft have skin in the game.
I was talking about two different people,,
the first are people that have never worked and plan to never work and living off the government.,, which is living off of me and others that work for a living,,
the other is those that have no fear of being drafted,,
two seperate things with a little overlap,,And if those with no fear of being drafted have no skin in the game, it means only those who DO have fear of being drafted have skin in the game...
So you're for fighting against Russia in the Ukraine all of the sudden?Apparently you forgot about Korea and Vietnam. But liberals like you probably opposed us fighting against communists.
two seperate things with a little overlap,,
do you think people that intend on never working and living off of the government/us should be allowed to vote??

lenny, lenny, lenny.Apparently you forgot about Korea and Vietnam. But liberals like you probably opposed us fighting against communists.
Apparently you forgot about Korea and Vietnam. But liberals like you probably opposed us fighting against communists.
two seperate things with a little overlap,,
do you think people that intend on never working and living off of the government/us should be allowed to vote??
then you and I stand apart on that issue,,Separate things? It's the 2 sides of the same thing.
I think anyone 18 or older who isn't in prison should be able to vote. I don't want the government to start trying to determine people's intentions in life to decide if they are 'worthy' of voting.
The problem is in determining what constitutes a “useless moron”. And in trying to make sure those who do make such a determination don’t abuse that power.then you and I stand apart on that issue,,
I dont think useless morons should be allowed to make decisions for the country if they cant even do it for themselves,,
would someone that only takes from a system with no intentions of contributing to it be a useless moron to you?? cause it is to me,, more so when they only express hatred for those providing their only means of existence,,The problem is in determining what constitutes a “useless moron”. And in trying to make sure those who do make such a determination don’t abuse that power.
How many such people do you think there are? How will government determine who they are to make sure they can’t vote?would someone that only takes from a system with no intentions of contributing to it be a useless moron to you?? cause it is to me,, more so when they only express hatred for those providing their only means of existence,,
why do you answer a question with another question??How many such people do you think there are? How will government determine who they are to make sure they can’t vote?
Who specifically regrets that?America grew very successfully in it's early days due to conservative leadership. We were the envy of the world. Everybody wanted to move to America.
Somewhere along the line we lost our way. The Founding Fathers knew how we should run our elections, but we veered from that path. And now we are paying the price for it. Also paying the price for it are other countries that also now have liberal election laws.
---The female vote stems the tide of the far right in Europe and Latin America---
![]()
Data | The female vote stems the tide of the far right in Europe and Latin America
Surveys from the most recent elections in Argentina, Poland, Brazil and Spain confirm that women vote less for extreme parties, as noted by many academic studiesenglish.elpais.com
Because what you personally think doesn’t really make a lot of difference when talking about whether people will be able to vote, unless you become a dictator over the US lol.why do you answer a question with another question??
why do you answer a question with another question??How many such people do you think there are? How will government determine who they are to make sure they can’t vote?
or unless there are enough people that think as I do,,Because what you personally think doesn’t really make a lot of difference when talking about whether people will be able to vote, unless you become a dictator over the US lol.
So who exactly are the useless morons you are talking about? How would they be found so they could not vote? In the context of the thread, are they mostly women?
I doubt I have the same idea about who is or is not a useless moron that you do.
It certainly is – as misogynistic as always.This is the Republican Party folks