Why Shouldnt DACA Illegal Aliens Be Deported

Canada, with their small population, has been the # 1 supplier (by a wide margin) of oil to the US, and its large population, for decades. You haven't addressed this...and you won't. :biggrin:
You make this sound like it is a bad thing and is somehow connected to population size. Explain why this is bad and why size matters then I'll address it.
 
If you are what you say you are you'd know it is under-developed economies that export raw materials to the 1st world economies that utilize them. On the other hand, as frac'ing technology improves, the US is becoming an exporter of energy.

Did the US become stronger or weaker during the 19th and 20th centuries when our population expanded dramatically?
Canada, with their small population, has been the # 1 supplier (by a wide margin) of oil to the US, and its large population, for decades. You haven't addressed this...and you won't. :biggrin:


Harms of Immigration

1.
Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).

2. Wage reduction.

3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($138 Billion/year).

5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

6. Increased crime.

7. Increased traffic congestion.

8. Increased pollution.

9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

11. Overcrowding in government offices.

12. Overcrowding in schools.

13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

14. Cultural erosion.

15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)

16. Introduction of foreign diseases.

17. Influx of terrorists (ex. ISIS with "Syrian refugees")
income disparity does that regardless of legal status; only the right wing, never gets it.
 
Pull your head out of your ass and learn something.

Opinion: Why remittances are good for America - CNN
CNN. HA HA HA.

When do I get to remove all that stuff from your house (with your blessing) ? :laugh:

What a dumbass. The CNN article was an op-ed that clearly explained what I have been saying and what your racism blocks you from seeing. Hell, it is common sense. The remittances are dollars flowing out of the country without the loss of goods. That means less dollars chasing the same amount of goods. As the op-ed explained, it is like getting free labor for the host country because the cost of that labor is not countered with the loss of goods. The proper analogy is not you breaking in to my house and taking goods. It is you breaking in to my house and washing my clothes, cleaning my bathrooms, and cooking my breakfast before you leave. I get the labor and I don't lose any goods.

And I notice you have mentioned Canada in this thread. Canada actually has a much higher rate of foreign remittances per capita than the United States. Foreign workers and immigrants send out a massive 24 billion dollars per year. And follows is an econometric study of German foreign remittances which concludes,

An increase in remittances results in a higher share of exports, an improvement of the trade balance and an increase in GDP.

http://www.norface-migration.org/publ_uploads/NDP_21_12.pdf

In economic terms, those remittances reflect a reverse Dutch disease effect on the host country. That is what stimulates the increase in exports and GDP. And it is the well documented Dutch disease effect that actually harms the economy of the receiving country by spurring inflation, increasing the value of their currency making exports more expensive, and stifling innovation while encouraging dependency.
 
Canada, with their small population, has been the # 1 supplier (by a wide margin) of oil to the US, and its large population, for decades. You haven't addressed this...and you won't. :biggrin:
You make this sound like it is a bad thing and is somehow connected to population size. Explain why this is bad and why size matters then I'll address it.

I got this. It is the exact opposite of what remittances do for the US economy.

The Canadian dollar, oil and 'Canada's Dutch Disease'
 
The best way to get the Democrats to support deporting the DACA scum is to get the DACAs to start voting Republican. Then the Democrats would get them out fast.

The Democrats don't give a shit about people, only power so they can make America a socialist shithole. DACAs give them a few more votes in the future so that is why the filthy Democrats want them to stay..

However, Democrats will never agree to an end to chain migration to get the DACAs because they know there are more numbers in chain migration.

Democrats are scumbags that need to import welfare queens in order to maintain a voting base. They will go with whatever brings in the greatest number of future Moon Bat voters.
 
The best way to get the Democrats to support deporting the DACA scum is to get the DACAs to start voting Republican. Then the Democrats would get them out fast.

The Democrats don't give a shit about people, only power so they can make America a socialist shithole. DACAs give them a few more votes in the future so that is why the filthy Democrats want them to stay..

However, Democrats will never agree to an end to chain migration to get the DACAs because they know there are more numbers in chain migration.

Democrats are scumbags that need to import welfare queens in order to maintain a voting base. They will go with whatever brings in the greatest number of future Moon Bat voters.

You may want to do some minor research there Rambo.
1. Obama’s DACA program is only to save them from deportation. No pathway to legal immigration or US citizenships. No chain immigration.

Trumpy offered US citizenship to 1.8 millions DACA members. Happy?

2. Chain migration is not limited to Mexico.

3. All illegals are not welfare dependent. They have jobs.

4. About 72% of Americans support DACA.

5. You said ........ Democrats import illegals to maintain voting base. If that is true then Trump is not the president.

5. Lastly to all these tough guys here........... Let say we if deport them both DACA’s and other illegals. Who will do their low skilled paying jobs? WHO? Right now the economy is booming with low unemployment......... Are you going to quit your job and take these jobs? Are you going to give up your welfare checks and start working?

Now tell me where I’m wrong.
 
Because this is the country they know and they work and go to school and help support the economy.
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
 
Last edited:
The best way to get the Democrats to support deporting the DACA scum is to get the DACAs to start voting Republican. Then the Democrats would get them out fast.

The Democrats don't give a shit about people, only power so they can make America a socialist shithole. DACAs give them a few more votes in the future so that is why the filthy Democrats want them to stay..

However, Democrats will never agree to an end to chain migration to get the DACAs because they know there are more numbers in chain migration.

Democrats are scumbags that need to import welfare queens in order to maintain a voting base. They will go with whatever brings in the greatest number of future Moon Bat voters.

You may want to do some minor research there Rambo.
1. Obama’s DACA program is only to save them from deportation. No pathway to legal immigration or US citizenships. No chain immigration.

Trumpy offered US citizenship to 1.8 millions DACA members. Happy?

2. Chain migration is not limited to Mexico.

3. All illegals are not welfare dependent. They have jobs.

4. About 72% of Americans support DACA.

5. You said ........ Democrats import illegals to maintain voting base. If that is true then Trump is not the president.

5. Lastly to all these tough guys here........... Let say we if deport them both DACA’s and other illegals. Who will do their low skilled paying jobs? WHO? Right now the economy is booming with low unemployment......... Are you going to quit your job and take these jobs? Are you going to give up your welfare checks and start working?

Now tell me where I’m wrong.
1) DACA doesn't protect them from deportation. They are in deportation hearings that have been prolonged, therefor they are paroled in place and allowed to apply for work authorization while they wait for their final hearing. They can be deported at any time for any reason.

2) OK

3) Not all illegals have jobs, a good many of households headed by illegals are receiving some sort of welfare.

4) So

5) You misunderstood what he said, try again.

6) Who will do their jobs? SMFH Citizens/LPR's/visa holders/mechanization....Those on welfare should get off their ass and get a job, welfare should be limited to a short period of time, not for life.

There, I told you where you were wrong.
 
Because this is the country they know and they work and go to school and help support the economy.
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
1) DACA doesn't contribute much of anything to the economy, they simply fill jobs that could be held by an actual legal worker.

2) Removal of illegals will lower remittances to foreign countries.
 
Because this is the country they know and they work and go to school and help support the economy.
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
1) DACA doesn't contribute much of anything to the economy, they simply fill jobs that could be held by an actual legal worker.

2) Removal of illegals will lower remittances to foreign countries.

So they don't rent, hold jobs, pay taxes, and pay sales tax. Wonder what the home builders in TXwill do without illegals aliens that work for peanuts and put in 12 hour days.
 
Because this is the country they know and they work and go to school and help support the economy.
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
1) DACA doesn't contribute much of anything to the economy, they simply fill jobs that could be held by an actual legal worker.

2) Removal of illegals will lower remittances to foreign countries.

So they don't rent, hold jobs, pay taxes, and pay sales tax. Wonder what the home builders in TXwill do without illegals aliens that work for peanuts and put in 12 hour days.
They drive up the cost of rent, they pay user taxes and sales taxes, any payroll taxes they have with held they receive back when they file their tax forms, they are eligible for medicare and SS.

Home builders using illegal labor should be put out of business. Do you really think those builders then charge you less for that house?
 
The illegal aliens commonly referred to as DACA (Deferred Action Childhood Arrivals) have become a major impasse between Democrats and Republicans.

DACA is an executive order that was illegally enacted byBarrack Obama, and that alone couldshould define deportation as the proper action. In addition to Obama's recklessness (to boost Democrat VOTES), the DACA people did come here illegally, and like all other illegal aliens, fit the description of th 17 "Harms of Immigration", just as much as those who came here as adults. In fact, since thy will live longer, they are MORE of a harm than the adult arrivees.

So to PROTECT the American people (always the # 1 responsibility of government) from these many long-lasting harms, shouldn't ALL illegl aliens be deported ? Should we be puting empathy for the DACAs oer protection of the American people, in contradiction to the protecive immigration laws that our ancestors provided fr us ? I think not.

Sure the deportations could result in family separations, but that is a problem that is caused by those who came here illegally, not th American people. Also, recent studies are now showing that there are very few fmiy separations from deportations, wih families sticking together and all going back to the old country, together as a unit.

Some major points have been overlooked in th DACA discussions. One is that the DACAs ar overwhelmingly Hispanic, and Hispanics tend to vote Democrat (which is why Democrats fight so fiercly for them). So keeping them in th US has adverse political effects on Republicans.

The other points are firmly embedded in the 17 points of Harms of Immigration * which if polls are correct, show how ignorant Americans are about immigration - to support something so harmful to them.

* Harms of Immigration

1. Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).

2. Wage reduction.

3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($40 Billion year).

5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

6. Increased crime.

7. Increased traffic congestion.

8. Increased pollution.

9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

11. Overcrowding in government offices.

12. Overcrowding in schools.

13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

14. Cultural erosion.

15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)

16. Introduction of foreign diseases.
How about....
230d47aeaf64bfe32fe83db3ef6bde07f2733a9cfa2f91f634389ee64f299e96.jpg


Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk
 
Because this is the country they know and they work and go to school and help support the economy.
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
1) DACA doesn't contribute much of anything to the economy, they simply fill jobs that could be held by an actual legal worker.

2) Removal of illegals will lower remittances to foreign countries.

1. That is not true. They pay taxes and contribute to the success of the economy especially here in Ca. Again you are trying to minimizing the importance of these workers. They have teachers, engineers, nurses etc etc. Look at the economy and unemployment rate. Currently its hard to find workers. I might hire some H1.

2. This is way off from what I was talking about.
 
The best way to get the Democrats to support deporting the DACA scum is to get the DACAs to start voting Republican. Then the Democrats would get them out fast.

The Democrats don't give a shit about people, only power so they can make America a socialist shithole. DACAs give them a few more votes in the future so that is why the filthy Democrats want them to stay..

However, Democrats will never agree to an end to chain migration to get the DACAs because they know there are more numbers in chain migration.

Democrats are scumbags that need to import welfare queens in order to maintain a voting base. They will go with whatever brings in the greatest number of future Moon Bat voters.

You may want to do some minor research there Rambo.
1. Obama’s DACA program is only to save them from deportation. No pathway to legal immigration or US citizenships. No chain immigration.

Trumpy offered US citizenship to 1.8 millions DACA members. Happy?

2. Chain migration is not limited to Mexico.

3. All illegals are not welfare dependent. They have jobs.

4. About 72% of Americans support DACA.

5. You said ........ Democrats import illegals to maintain voting base. If that is true then Trump is not the president.

5. Lastly to all these tough guys here........... Let say we if deport them both DACA’s and other illegals. Who will do their low skilled paying jobs? WHO? Right now the economy is booming with low unemployment......... Are you going to quit your job and take these jobs? Are you going to give up your welfare checks and start working?

Now tell me where I’m wrong.
1) DACA doesn't protect them from deportation. They are in deportation hearings that have been prolonged, therefor they are paroled in place and allowed to apply for work authorization while they wait for their final hearing. They can be deported at any time for any reason.

2) OK

3) Not all illegals have jobs, a good many of households headed by illegals are receiving some sort of welfare.

4) So

5) You misunderstood what he said, try again.

6) Who will do their jobs? SMFH Citizens/LPR's/visa holders/mechanization....Those on welfare should get off their ass and get a job, welfare should be limited to a short period of time, not for life.

There, I told you where you were wrong.

1. Incorrect. DACA program only save them from deportation. No pathways legal immigration. Do your homework.
2.
3. I never said ALL.
4. That means you are the minority. Even GOPs support the program.
5. No I did not.
6. Incorrect. There are jobs available right now but where are they?
Agree on welfare...... but in reality if these lazy people will give up their welfare and get a job. They probably spend more on babysitters than what they make.

Not a single one of your post prove me wrong. Try again.
 
Because this is the country they know and they work and go to school and help support the economy.
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
1) DACA doesn't contribute much of anything to the economy, they simply fill jobs that could be held by an actual legal worker.

2) Removal of illegals will lower remittances to foreign countries.

So they don't rent, hold jobs, pay taxes, and pay sales tax. Wonder what the home builders in TXwill do without illegals aliens that work for peanuts and put in 12 hour days.
1. They drive up the cost of rent, they pay user taxes and sales taxes, any payroll taxes they have with held they receive back when they file their tax forms, they are eligible for medicare and SS.

2. Home builders using illegal labor should be put out of business. Do you really think those builders then charge you less for that house?

1. Explain why they drive up cost of rents.

2. The problem with ( AGAIN ) that is they cannot find enough workers. Some of these people in Texas that need to rebuild their houses have a waiting period like 3 months to 8 months.
If I understand you correct they should just wait till american citizens or legal immigrants come forward and do the job?
If that is you ....... are you going to look around for legal workers? Explain yourself.

You are so way off.
 
Because this is the country they know and they work and go to school and help support the economy.
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
1) DACA doesn't contribute much of anything to the economy, they simply fill jobs that could be held by an actual legal worker.

2) Removal of illegals will lower remittances to foreign countries.

1. That is not true. They pay taxes and contribute to the success of the economy especially here in Ca. Again you are trying to minimizing the importance of these workers. They have teachers, engineers, nurses etc etc. Look at the economy and unemployment rate. Currently its hard to find workers. I might hire some H1.

2. This is way off from what I was talking about.
1) They pay user tax and pay roll deductions, so what, that isn't a contribution any different than any other worker or person here. The success of the economy is subjective, beyond them having a job and purchasing product, there is no actual contribution. Good for you hiring H1's, good luck getting one in the next few years as the applications are all maxed out.

2) They would better their families social status. SHRUG
 
The best way to get the Democrats to support deporting the DACA scum is to get the DACAs to start voting Republican. Then the Democrats would get them out fast.

The Democrats don't give a shit about people, only power so they can make America a socialist shithole. DACAs give them a few more votes in the future so that is why the filthy Democrats want them to stay..

However, Democrats will never agree to an end to chain migration to get the DACAs because they know there are more numbers in chain migration.

Democrats are scumbags that need to import welfare queens in order to maintain a voting base. They will go with whatever brings in the greatest number of future Moon Bat voters.

You may want to do some minor research there Rambo.
1. Obama’s DACA program is only to save them from deportation. No pathway to legal immigration or US citizenships. No chain immigration.

Trumpy offered US citizenship to 1.8 millions DACA members. Happy?

2. Chain migration is not limited to Mexico.

3. All illegals are not welfare dependent. They have jobs.

4. About 72% of Americans support DACA.

5. You said ........ Democrats import illegals to maintain voting base. If that is true then Trump is not the president.

5. Lastly to all these tough guys here........... Let say we if deport them both DACA’s and other illegals. Who will do their low skilled paying jobs? WHO? Right now the economy is booming with low unemployment......... Are you going to quit your job and take these jobs? Are you going to give up your welfare checks and start working?

Now tell me where I’m wrong.
1) DACA doesn't protect them from deportation. They are in deportation hearings that have been prolonged, therefor they are paroled in place and allowed to apply for work authorization while they wait for their final hearing. They can be deported at any time for any reason.

2) OK

3) Not all illegals have jobs, a good many of households headed by illegals are receiving some sort of welfare.

4) So

5) You misunderstood what he said, try again.

6) Who will do their jobs? SMFH Citizens/LPR's/visa holders/mechanization....Those on welfare should get off their ass and get a job, welfare should be limited to a short period of time, not for life.

There, I told you where you were wrong.

1. Incorrect. DACA program only save them from deportation. No pathways legal immigration. Do your homework.
2.
3. I never said ALL.
4. That means you are the minority. Even GOPs support the program.
5. No I did not.
6. Incorrect. There are jobs available right now but where are they?
Agree on welfare...... but in reality if these lazy people will give up their welfare and get a job. They probably spend more on babysitters than what they make.

Not a single one of your post prove me wrong. Try again.
DACA does not protect/save them from deportation. I have done my homework, may be you should try doing some. SMFH They are in deportation proceedings that are deferred, that doesn't save them from deportation as they can be deported for any immigration infraction. They were simply at the bottom of the removal ladder under Obama.
 
1. Problem with that answer is it only talks about "they" > the DACAs. It completely overlooks the AMERICAN people who are suffering the harms of immigration that THEY bring

2. I see it as not about "they". I see it as about the Americans who lose jobs, the US economy that suffers $133 Billion.year loss (in remittances), the US govt that suffers major losses in tax $$$, etc, etc
?

1. Here is the problem with that. Most or all of of these people are seeking better lives not crimes. DACA cannot bring in relatives to US. And they contribute a large part of the booming economy.

2. $133 billions remittance. I’m sure you are an international expert of money foreign exchange, international trades and banking.
So my questions to you is...... What do you think they will do with their US dollars once it reach Mexico or other countries?
Are they going to keep in under their pillows as a souvenirs? Or make it a tortilla?
Why do you think it’s a US lose and loss of American jobs?
What made you think that deporting illegals will stop these remittances?
1) DACA doesn't contribute much of anything to the economy, they simply fill jobs that could be held by an actual legal worker.

2) Removal of illegals will lower remittances to foreign countries.

So they don't rent, hold jobs, pay taxes, and pay sales tax. Wonder what the home builders in TXwill do without illegals aliens that work for peanuts and put in 12 hour days.
1. They drive up the cost of rent, they pay user taxes and sales taxes, any payroll taxes they have with held they receive back when they file their tax forms, they are eligible for medicare and SS.

2. Home builders using illegal labor should be put out of business. Do you really think those builders then charge you less for that house?

1. Explain why they drive up cost of rents.

2. The problem with ( AGAIN ) that is they cannot find enough workers. Some of these people in Texas that need to rebuild their houses have a waiting period like 3 months to 8 months.
If I understand you correct they should just wait till american citizens or legal immigrants come forward and do the job?
If that is you ....... are you going to look around for legal workers? Explain yourself.

You are so way off.
1) Supply and demand. More people looking to rent drives up the costs for the limited amount of homes for rent. That's basic economics. SMFH

2) So what. Illegals do not have the right to work here and if a company is knowingly hiring and using illegals they should be out of business.

When I hire a person I use the required I-9 form and then use E-verify, if the worker comes back as eligible to work then I usually hire him/her. I have no problem finding legal workers.

Where is it you think I am way off? SMFH
 

Forum List

Back
Top