Why SHOULD CBS, NBC, ABC keep their broadcasting licenses?

[Seawytch]

Wow...Somebody is upset he can't post his Alex Jones bullshit on his news feed any more....

get a load of this faggit, he thinks Alex Jones is alt-right LOL

He's not insane enough for you apparently. My apologies.

You realize that Facebook does not have a broadcasting license, right? That they are a private entity and can censor their content if they so desire? It's good business practice to keep racist, Nazi propaganda out.

Then by the same token, the anti-white racism and communist subversion the MSM churns out should be treated with even harsher methods. I'm thinking prison time and gallows.

Racism should be treated equally. However, knowing that you are a Nazi supporter, I'm going to bet that your idea of anti white racism isn't actually.

 

[martybegan]

The networks pay practically nothing for their broadcasting licenses, and they use them to undermine our society and create chaos and dissatisfaction in our people. Also, they actively promote immorality and sexual perversion in their fictional shows.

I think the bigger question is how many people still get the major networks over the airwaves?

Even if they were to lose their right to broadcast at certain frequencies, doesn't that mean diddly for people who get them via cable, DSL or satellite?

Wait...You, the alleged libertarian, actually think their is a "bigger question" in trying to infringe upon the freedom of the press?

I am wondering how much of an infringement it would actually be. Again, how many people still get television over the airwaves?

Now if he went after a Radio station it would be much different, as most people still listen to radio over the licensed broadcast frequencies.

To me it was more of his posturing and bluster, but if you read how the broadcast laws are written, the reason companies are given rights to certain bandwidth relies on them working in 'the public interest" which leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

 

[martybegan]

This is the president`s second attack on the first amendment, time to impeach him for not honoring his oath of office.

he hasn't actually done anything yet, so basically you would be trying to impeach him for words.

Good luck with that.

 

[Seawytch]

we get stuck with rich greedy presidents. Notice every single one we've elected in the last 50 years is very wealthy

Obama didn't fall into this category. Maybe that is why the GOP was so scared of him?

By the time he ran he was wealthy. Name the last guy to run and win that wasn't wealthy.

 

[impuretrash]

Racism should be treated equally. However, knowing that you are a Nazi supporter, I'm going to bet that your idea of anti white racism isn't actually.

The nazis are dead, dude.

 

[Care4all]

Wow...Somebody is upset he can't post his Alex Jones bullshit on his news feed any more....

get a load of this faggit, he thinks Alex Jones is alt-right LOL

He's not insane enough for you apparently. My apologies.

You realize that Facebook does not have a broadcasting license, right? That they are a private entity and can censor their content if they so desire? It's good business practice to keep racist, Nazi propaganda out.

Then by the same token, the anti-white racism and communist subversion the MSM churns out should be treated with even harsher methods. I'm thinking prison time and gallows.

You are not in Russia or Turkey or north Korea or China or etc...

Get your bearings, you are posting on a U.S. message board.....

 

[Seawytch]

The networks pay practically nothing for their broadcasting licenses, and they use them to undermine our society and create chaos and dissatisfaction in our people. Also, they actively promote immorality and sexual perversion in their fictional shows.

I think the bigger question is how many people still get the major networks over the airwaves?

Even if they were to lose their right to broadcast at certain frequencies, doesn't that mean diddly for people who get them via cable, DSL or satellite?

Wait...You, the alleged libertarian, actually think their is a "bigger question" in trying to infringe upon the freedom of the press?

I am wondering how much of an infringement it would actually be. Again, how many people still get television over the airwaves?

Now if he went after a Radio station it would be much different, as most people still listen to radio over the licensed broadcast frequencies.

To me it was more of his posturing and bluster, but if you read how the broadcast laws are written, the reason companies are given rights to certain bandwidth relies on them working in 'the public interest" which leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

How much infringement would it be if we just took away some of the guns?

That well regulated militia part leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

 

[initforme]

Mayne it's time for a Wal-Mart floor worker to take the reigns instead of uber wealthy greedy ones.

 

[Seawytch]

Racism should be treated equally. However, knowing that you are a Nazi supporter, I'm going to bet that your idea of anti white racism isn't actually.

The nazis are dead, dude.

No they aren't, they've just re-branded themselves the "alt-right".

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The networks pay practically nothing for their broadcasting licenses, and they use them to undermine our society and create chaos and dissatisfaction in our people. Also, they actively promote immorality and sexual perversion in their fictional shows.

The First Amendment is Important ...more Important than the Second Amendment .... we just had 59 citizens slaughtered by guns but no one is calling for revoking the 2 nd Amendment ...Trump is revoking Freedom of Speech because he does not like the reporting ? that is in a word "Crazy Shit"...oh and by the way "Crazy shit" is not a word its a phrase ...Word

Ben Sasse is a GOP Senator ...not a Democrat nor a liberal
Ben Sasse‏Verified account @BenSasse


Mr. President: Are you recanting of the Oath you took on Jan. 20 to preserve, protect, and defend the 1st Amendment?

 

[martybegan]

The networks pay practically nothing for their broadcasting licenses, and they use them to undermine our society and create chaos and dissatisfaction in our people. Also, they actively promote immorality and sexual perversion in their fictional shows.

I think the bigger question is how many people still get the major networks over the airwaves?

Even if they were to lose their right to broadcast at certain frequencies, doesn't that mean diddly for people who get them via cable, DSL or satellite?

Wait...You, the alleged libertarian, actually think their is a "bigger question" in trying to infringe upon the freedom of the press?

I am wondering how much of an infringement it would actually be. Again, how many people still get television over the airwaves?

Now if he went after a Radio station it would be much different, as most people still listen to radio over the licensed broadcast frequencies.

To me it was more of his posturing and bluster, but if you read how the broadcast laws are written, the reason companies are given rights to certain bandwidth relies on them working in 'the public interest" which leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

How much infringement would it be if we just took away some of the guns?

That well regulated militia part leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

If you want to go with a loophole when it comes to the free press the 1st amendment specifically calls out on congress to respect a free press.

The whole concept of the FCC being able to regulate a scarce commodity (bandwidth) has been established numerous times via the courts.

and considering the people keep the RKBA, not the militias the confusion on your part is simply a matter of convenience for your gun grabbing jerk-off fantasies.

Again, this is all moot because I doubt he is actually going to do anything about it. He's triggered you idiots once again.

 

[impuretrash]

Racism should be treated equally. However, knowing that you are a Nazi supporter, I'm going to bet that your idea of anti white racism isn't actually.

The nazis are dead, dude.

No they aren't, they've just re-branded themselves the "alt-right".

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Racism should be treated equally. However, knowing that you are a Nazi supporter, I'm going to bet that your idea of anti white racism isn't actually.

The nazis are dead, dude.

I seen them Tiki torch parading at the University of Virginia

 

[alang1216]

we get stuck with rich greedy presidents. Notice every single one we've elected in the last 50 years is very wealthy

Obama didn't fall into this category. Maybe that is why the GOP was so scared of him?

By the time he ran he was wealthy. Name the last guy to run and win that wasn't wealthy.

When Obama became President in 2007, his net worth was only $1.3 million. Not bad but not in the same league as the others.

 

[Care4all]

Gone are the days of unbiased reporting. Gone is Walter Cronkite.
They are ******* terrorists nowadays, spreading their hate and biased opinions with fake news and bullshit.

There never was an unbiased press....

Fox news as example was created specifically created to spin the Republican party in to relevance....

And this type of thing began on day one, in our founders time and even before that....with the press....

 

[impuretrash]

Racism should be treated equally. However, knowing that you are a Nazi supporter, I'm going to bet that your idea of anti white racism isn't actually.

The nazis are dead, dude.

I seen them Tiki torch parading at the University of Virginia

Why is it that white people cannot advocate for their own interests without being accused of being adherents of a 1930s german socialist movement?

 

[Seawytch]

The networks pay practically nothing for their broadcasting licenses, and they use them to undermine our society and create chaos and dissatisfaction in our people. Also, they actively promote immorality and sexual perversion in their fictional shows.

I think the bigger question is how many people still get the major networks over the airwaves?

Even if they were to lose their right to broadcast at certain frequencies, doesn't that mean diddly for people who get them via cable, DSL or satellite?

Wait...You, the alleged libertarian, actually think their is a "bigger question" in trying to infringe upon the freedom of the press?

I am wondering how much of an infringement it would actually be. Again, how many people still get television over the airwaves?

Now if he went after a Radio station it would be much different, as most people still listen to radio over the licensed broadcast frequencies.

To me it was more of his posturing and bluster, but if you read how the broadcast laws are written, the reason companies are given rights to certain bandwidth relies on them working in 'the public interest" which leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

How much infringement would it be if we just took away some of the guns?

That well regulated militia part leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

If you want to go with a loophole when it comes to the free press the 1st amendment specifically calls out on congress to respect a free press.

The whole concept of the FCC being able to regulate a scarce commodity (bandwidth) has been established numerous times via the courts.

and considering the people keep the RKBA, not the militias the confusion on your part is simply a matter of convenience for your gun grabbing jerk-off fantasies.

Again, this is all moot because I doubt he is actually going to do anything about it. He's triggered you idiots once again.

It's not moot when the so called President of the United States repeatedly flirts with authoritarian dictatorship. Trump loves "strong leaders" like Duterte, Putin, Kim Kong Un and Erdogan.

 

[martybegan]

I think the bigger question is how many people still get the major networks over the airwaves?

Even if they were to lose their right to broadcast at certain frequencies, doesn't that mean diddly for people who get them via cable, DSL or satellite?

Wait...You, the alleged libertarian, actually think their is a "bigger question" in trying to infringe upon the freedom of the press?

I am wondering how much of an infringement it would actually be. Again, how many people still get television over the airwaves?

Now if he went after a Radio station it would be much different, as most people still listen to radio over the licensed broadcast frequencies.

To me it was more of his posturing and bluster, but if you read how the broadcast laws are written, the reason companies are given rights to certain bandwidth relies on them working in 'the public interest" which leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

How much infringement would it be if we just took away some of the guns?

That well regulated militia part leads to all sorts of interpretive issues.

If you want to go with a loophole when it comes to the free press the 1st amendment specifically calls out on congress to respect a free press.

The whole concept of the FCC being able to regulate a scarce commodity (bandwidth) has been established numerous times via the courts.

and considering the people keep the RKBA, not the militias the confusion on your part is simply a matter of convenience for your gun grabbing jerk-off fantasies.

Again, this is all moot because I doubt he is actually going to do anything about it. He's triggered you idiots once again.

It's not moot when the so called President of the United States repeatedly flirts with authoritarian dictatorship. Trump loves "strong leaders" like Duterte, Putin, Kim Kong Un and Erdogan.

So what steps has he taken to set up this dictatorship?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Ben Sasse is a GOP Senator ...not a Democrat nor a liberal
Ben Sasse‏Verified account @BenSasse
Mr. President: Are you recanting of the Oath you took on Jan. 20 to preserve, protect, and defend the 1st Amendment?

Trump's Oath is not worth the breath to take them

...
Are you kidding? The "president" took an oath three times with three different women and each time he ignored it. And then there are the contract oaths he broke thousands of time.

 

[Seawytch]

Racism should be treated equally. However, knowing that you are a Nazi supporter, I'm going to bet that your idea of anti white racism isn't actually.

The nazis are dead, dude.

I seen them Tiki torch parading at the University of Virginia

Why is it that white people cannot advocate for their own interests without being accused of being adherents of a 1930s german socialist movement?

What "own interest" do you have? White people are not, nor have they ever been, an oppressed minority in this country.