Why progressives want to destroy Christianity — but spare Islam

It just means he’s a Christian who doesn’t believe in imposing his beliefs on others, unlike the Christian Fundamentalist Taliban.
/—-/ That’s not what it means. We encourage but don’t mandate to non Catholics, unlike Muslims who use force to make others comply. Now, pretend you don’t know what I mean.
 
When I was an athlete, I didn't care. If you were up against me, you would either get your ass whipped or we would be in one hell of a battle. There aren't all that many trans athletes, and the right is blowing this all out of proportion just like they do everything else to try to force everybody to submit t their agenda.
I think the women athletes would disagree with you.
 
No, no it is the truth.

Name one thing Mohammad did or said that a follower will say was wrong

As for the Left, they alone own the source of all truthiness and scientific knowledge, and the perfect public policies to implement them. No other parties are welcome.

Men can be women, women can be men, and if you disagree you can shut the hell up.
Wrong. I DGAF about your obsession with Mohammad. And you need to stop playing the victim.
 
There's an explanation for that too when Christians and atheists, such as ding and me, are able to accept the bibles as being allegory and not the literal fruth.

You can become a part of that!

In fact, you have no choice!

You act it, even though you dare not speak the truth. That's o.k.

Jonah and his big fish are for Marvin martian and co.
It was a fish like no other.
 
More action like feeding the poor, giving away all your riches and/or renouncing violence by turning the other cheek whenever your enemies slap you?

Because that's what Jesus instructs His followers to do.

What actions were you referring to do more of exactly?
More love and care for myself.
 
Last edited:
I think the women athletes would disagree with you.
I doubt that. I actually know women athletes. Stop listening to Riley Gaines. That ***** came in 7th place and cried because if Lia Thompson had not been in the race, she would have taken 6th.
 
I doubt that. I actually know women athletes. Stop listening to Riley Gaines. That ***** came in 7th place and cried because if Lia Thompson had not been in the race, she would have taken 6th.
Athletes that have a penis shouldn't be in women's sports or locker room. What the hell is wrong with you. :mad:
 
Wrong. I DGAF about your obsession with Mohammad. And you need to stop playing the victim.
And you need to answer the question or zip it.

Prove me wrong
 

In 1939, George Orwell coined the phrase "Judeo-Christian ethic" to include the values that formed the moral foundation of Western civilization.

This ethic influenced the American founders and helped shape their views on liberty, rights, and law. Post-Enlightenment philosophers have criticized the irrational aspects of religion and its role in the politics of state, but most have acknowledged the role that the Judeo-Christian ethic has served in preserving the fabric of society.

This article touches on the issue many have wonders, and that is, why do gays in San Fran march in unison to protest Israel when it is only Israel where they would not be thrown off the roof tops in the Middle East for being gay?

And why does the Left protest combining church and state but then bends over backwards trying to enforce the rights of Muslims to live under Sharia law in Western countries?

And why how can the Left continue to pretend to champion women's rights as well while defending or ignoring the world of Islam since women in Islamic cultures have zero rights and power within a given society and perhaps are treated worse than any culture on earth?

But I think the key is that Judeo-Christian traditions led to the freest and most prosperous country on earth, which is the problem.

Both Islam and the Left detest such freedoms, for different reasons. For the Leftist, there is an earth to save, which means minimizing your carbon output at every turn possible. Your freedoms are destroying their mother earth and using up it's precious natural resources. And for Islam, it is all about your moral freedoms as well. But both philosophies are really a political ideology, as the Left denies the existence of God as they then give full power to the state as if they were God, and Islam is mostly about spreading global Sharia law. Both require a fascistic power hold on any and all freedoms around the globe.
We do not want to destroy Christianity. We just want the Christians to leave us the **** alone
 
Your posts show that.
No one knows how anyone really acts by reading their posts here. People don't reveal their real selves here. Too many trolls.
 

In 1939, George Orwell coined the phrase "Judeo-Christian ethic" to include the values that formed the moral foundation of Western civilization.

This ethic influenced the American founders and helped shape their views on liberty, rights, and law. Post-Enlightenment philosophers have criticized the irrational aspects of religion and its role in the politics of state, but most have acknowledged the role that the Judeo-Christian ethic has served in preserving the fabric of society.

This article touches on the issue many have wonders, and that is, why do gays in San Fran march in unison to protest Israel when it is only Israel where they would not be thrown off the roof tops in the Middle East for being gay?

And why does the Left protest combining church and state but then bends over backwards trying to enforce the rights of Muslims to live under Sharia law in Western countries?

And why how can the Left continue to pretend to champion women's rights as well while defending or ignoring the world of Islam since women in Islamic cultures have zero rights and power within a given society and perhaps are treated worse than any culture on earth?

But I think the key is that Judeo-Christian traditions led to the freest and most prosperous country on earth, which is the problem.

Both Islam and the Left detest such freedoms, for different reasons. For the Leftist, there is an earth to save, which means minimizing your carbon output at every turn possible. Your freedoms are destroying their mother earth and using up it's precious natural resources. And for Islam, it is all about your moral freedoms as well. But both philosophies are really a political ideology, as the Left denies the existence of God as they then give full power to the state as if they were God, and Islam is mostly about spreading global Sharia law. Both require a fascistic power hold on any and all freedoms around the globe.
Democrats and Muslims are both totalitarian in their agenda. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
 

In 1939, George Orwell coined the phrase "Judeo-Christian ethic" to include the values that formed the moral foundation of Western civilization.

This ethic influenced the American founders and helped shape their views on liberty, rights, and law. Post-Enlightenment philosophers have criticized the irrational aspects of religion and its role in the politics of state, but most have acknowledged the role that the Judeo-Christian ethic has served in preserving the fabric of society.

This article touches on the issue many have wonders, and that is, why do gays in San Fran march in unison to protest Israel when it is only Israel where they would not be thrown off the roof tops in the Middle East for being gay?

And why does the Left protest combining church and state but then bends over backwards trying to enforce the rights of Muslims to live under Sharia law in Western countries?

And why how can the Left continue to pretend to champion women's rights as well while defending or ignoring the world of Islam since women in Islamic cultures have zero rights and power within a given society and perhaps are treated worse than any culture on earth?

But I think the key is that Judeo-Christian traditions led to the freest and most prosperous country on earth, which is the problem.

Both Islam and the Left detest such freedoms, for different reasons. For the Leftist, there is an earth to save, which means minimizing your carbon output at every turn possible. Your freedoms are destroying their mother earth and using up it's precious natural resources. And for Islam, it is all about your moral freedoms as well. But both philosophies are really a political ideology, as the Left denies the existence of God as they then give full power to the state as if they were God, and Islam is mostly about spreading global Sharia law. Both require a fascistic power hold on any and all freedoms around the globe.
The 'Progressives', actually Regressives, a.k.a. Political Left of USA tend to be hypocrites. Their choice for mayor of NY City is classic example as seen in this thread;
'Champagne Socialist' Zohran Mamdani throws lavish wedding party in Uganda
 
15th post
The 'Progressives', actually Regressives, a.k.a. Political Left of USA tend to be hypocrites. Their choice for mayor of NY City is classic example as seen in this thread;
'Champagne Socialist' Zohran Mamdani throws lavish wedding party in Uganda
Socialism is for thee and not for me

There is not one socialist/Marxist regime that did not live lavishly.

None.

The idea is to take from the small group of rich people to an even smaller group while more people suffer.
 
Back
Top Bottom