HaShev
Platinum Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 18,339
- 7,548
- 375
- Thread starter
- #21
WHAT DID I say, your answer had nothing to do with what I said and only smoke screened and excused their lying to the public. His being on the committee has nothing to do with congressional leaders requirements to report foreign nationals,She left in 2015 when the FBI was investigating her before Swalwell was on the committee.. As far as them having sex you don't know that they did or didn't.What national secrets were given away?Swallwell is not even alleged to have done anything wrong. This nonsense definitely belongs on this website... where insanity goes to thrive, instead of infecting the rest of the world...Because she was the benefactor of the illegitimate house majority.
So we know Swalwell was compromised by his numerous protections of China interests and through attempt to overthrow our dully elected president that was a threat to China trade disparities, so what about Pelosi's China ties?
Even though she took the side of China students against the Gov't, her career was made through China and that event.
Pelosi visiting with officials in China in November 2015. Pelosi was meeting with Zhang Dejiang, who was the leader of China’s equivalent to a legislative branch, so what did they give her campaign or otherwise for her to do China's propaganda during the virus at the risk of tens of thousands of lives during her China town photo opp?Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
![]()
Pelosi, Congressional Delegation Conclude Visit to China and Tibet
“Our purpose for this trip was to deepen our understanding, increase our mutual respect and further strengthen US-China ties."www.speaker.gov
Giving up national secrets to a Red Chinese spy in exchange for sex isn't "wrong" ? In what universe?
This Oriental broad is a spy you know.
We don't know , because Fang Fang isn't available for questioning and Rep Swalwell is mute on the issue. But the oriental chick's job was to get intelligence information , that's why she was fucking that loser Swalwell. It certainly wasn't due to his personality.
and it doesn't affect the classified briefings of congress he receives off the committee, nor her type of intelligence gathering and means of usage.
It also does not address their lying by saying they cut ties in 2015 when 2016 she was being paid and up until recently still in contact with his family in which case she can gather intelligence of his whereabouts and contacts (people they can use).
Lastly her interfering with elections and his taking assistance from a foreign gov't agent is exactly the grounds for dismissal according to Swalwell himself. Has he stepped down? Then Pelosi, Swalwell and Schiff all abused their power in impeaching Trump on false charges that they don't believe is enough for dismissal of collegue Swalwell who's charges are real.=that's called checkmate, taken out by your own arguments there are no moves/excuses left without taking out your former arguments & "claimed" concerns of foreign interference.
-case closed!