Why not be proactive against ISIS??

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.

Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?

So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?

Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?

They're making a million per day in oil sales.

NYTIMES had story today that France destroyed all the trucks used to transport the oil.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You can't "eliminate Raqqa with missiles". It would either have to be nuked or bombed like Dresden in WWII.

dear stupid liberal, missiles can have bombs and nukes on them!!!

 

[g5000]

There are 220,000 people in Raqqa.

There are only 30,000 ISISBOOMBAH troops. And they are not all in Raqqa.

 

[Timmy]

We could've sent 100,000 troops in last month . It wouldn't have stopped the France attack . You are fighting an idea more than some traditional army .

 

[Moonglow]

You can't "eliminate Raqqa with missiles". It would either have to be nuked or bombed like Dresden in WWII.

dear stupid liberal, missiles can have bombs and nukes on them!!!

Missiles have bombs?

 

[g5000]

You can't "eliminate Raqqa with missiles". It would either have to be nuked or bombed like Dresden in WWII.

dear stupid liberal, missiles can have bombs and nukes on them!!!

So you are ready to nuke a city of 220,000 civilians, eh?

HOLY SHIT!

 

[deltex1]

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.

Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?

So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?

Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?

They're making a million per day in oil sales.

NYTIMES had story today that France destroyed all the trucks used to transport the oil.

One might say that was long overdue. I hear they have a replacement order in with Volkswagen as we speak...

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Are you saying you want to wipe out the entire civilian population of a Syrian city? And you think this will make an impression on ISISBOOMBAH somehow?

dear, its like asking if they wiped out NYC or Washington whether that would make an impression!! How stupid

 

[deltex1]

You can't "eliminate Raqqa with missiles". It would either have to be nuked or bombed like Dresden in WWII.

dear stupid liberal, missiles can have bombs and nukes on them!!!

So you are ready to nuke a city of 220,000 civilians, eh?

HOLY SHIT!

Tell them to move...go to Michigan or Pennsylvania.

 

[g5000]

I guess if Putin nuked Raqqa, all the right wing rubes on this forum would perish from death by orgasm.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

So you are ready to nuke a city of 220,000 civilians, eh?

HOLY SHIT!

dear, why not ??? They are willing to kill far more Americans and we don't want to wait till they do it. We want to be proactive. Catching on??. But we could leaflet the city first perhaps.

 

[g5000]

Are you saying you want to wipe out the entire civilian population of a Syrian city? And you think this will make an impression on ISISBOOMBAH somehow?

dear, its like asking if they wiped out NYC or Washington whether that would make an impression!! How stupid

Oh, it would definitely make an impression. On the entire planet.

 

[deltex1]

There are 220,000 people in Raqqa.

There are only 30,000 ISISBOOMBAH troops. And they are not all in Raqqa.

Google that, Gertrude.

 

[g5000]

Wow. Someone is actually advocating we nuke 220,000 civilians.

Wow.

 

[BluesLegend]

"Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.

You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.

dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?

You can also not defeat ISIS by sitting around with your thumb stuck up your ass like Obama has been doing. He's clearly just trying to run out the clock on his presidency doing as little as possible about the problem he has mismanaged.

So do you support sending in at least 30,000 troops to finish them off?

Obama just got butt humped by ISIS on national TV he clearly needs to stop looking like a weak impotent do nothing coward.

 

[deltex1]

Are you saying you want to wipe out the entire civilian population of a Syrian city? And you think this will make an impression on ISISBOOMBAH somehow?

dear, its like asking if they wiped out NYC or Washington whether that would make an impression!! How stupid

Oh, it would definitely make an impression. On the entire planet.

I would call it a depression...as in large hole.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Wow. Someone is actually advocating we nuke 220,000 civilians.

Wow.

And some are advocating that we wait till they kill millions of us first.

And I would not describe the center of the Caliphate as a city of 220K civilians!!!

 

[Slyhunter]

We destroy their capital, their government buildings, their military facilities, their power plants, and their oil facilities by air. We use drones to destroy their leadership. We close their bank accounts. No need for ground troops.

 

[g5000]

So you are ready to nuke a city of 220,000 civilians, eh?

HOLY SHIT!

dear, why not ??? They are willing to kill far more Americans and we don't want to wait till they do it. We want to be proactive. Catching on??. But we could leaflet the city first perhaps.

Yes, let's leaflet the city and ISIS will let the civilians leave while they stay.

BWA-HA-HA-HA!

Holy ****, you are seriously retarded.

 

[g5000]

Inside the Islamic State ‘capital’: no end in sight to its grim rule

The people of Raqqa are hostages to ISIS.

Assholes.

The city has become a prison for women under 45. The regime says they cannot leave because they may be raped in areas held by Isis or other rebel groups, but most people inside Raqqa think that it is because they are desperate for more wives for the fighters.

Isis has banned men born after 1992 from leaving the city for regime areas, to take exams, collect salaries or anything else. That means that no one can go any more, because who wants to flee to Turkey without their wife or daughters and sons?

This is who you want to nuke, eh?