Why No FBI....?

Not for something from 40 years ago with NO physical evidence no list of witnesses no location listed. Further it was a local matter between TEENAGERS. Any possibility it had a criminal component is null and void by statute of Limitations to boot.

Well, sparky, it was a local matter then - but it's a federal matter now. Dr. Ford can still file criminal charges in Maryland.


it's a federal matter?


:21::21::21::21::21:

Yeah, sparky, it certainly is - because the hearing and confirmation of Kavanaugh is being conducted by the U.S. Senate.

Bullshit. The FBI does background INVESTIGATIONS for nominees, they do not get involved in the vetting hijacks and pranks like this one.. They are NOT a political toy for EITHER party. As you will soon be PERFECTLY clear on that issue...

Bullshit. They did for Anita Hill. It was even ordered by then-President George H.W. Bush.

Bet you a Subway Sandwich that was a GENERAL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION ordered by EVERY President on POTENTIAL SupCt nominees. That's part of the vetting BEFORE they are EVEN CHOSEN.

Wasn't about a pubic hair on a Coke can. I guarandamntee it... Think the FBI was looking for that pubic hair??
.

I didn't see it but all this you've been fed has MadCow all over it.. It was HER -- wasn't it??? She's the one earning you all the funnies.

 
it's a federal matter?


:21::21::21::21::21:

Yeah, sparky, it certainly is - because the hearing and confirmation of Kavanaugh is being conducted by the U.S. Senate.


Still doesn't make a possible groping a federal matter.

You're missing the point. Crime and federal have nothing to do with it. The conduct and who is telling the truth is what matters. Kavanaugh would have been better off if he had just admitted it and moved on.


admitted to a lie?

is that how you get past things?

Investigation is the best way to "get past things".

You just said he should admit to a lie
 
Yeah, sparky, it certainly is - because the hearing and confirmation of Kavanaugh is being conducted by the U.S. Senate.


Still doesn't make a possible groping a federal matter.

You're missing the point. Crime and federal have nothing to do with it. The conduct and who is telling the truth is what matters. Kavanaugh would have been better off if he had just admitted it and moved on.


admitted to a lie?

is that how you get past things?

Investigation is the best way to "get past things".

You just said he should admit to a lie

If it's true. He should also take a polygraph test and request an FBI investigation - like Dr. Ford.
 
Maryland Statutes of Limitations for Sexual Abuse | LegalMatch Law Library

Seems MD does have a statute of limitation


and in this case its long past

I recently heard it has been abolished.


first paragraph:

"Depending on the timing of your abuse, different statutes of limitations may also apply. Maryland law assigns different filing deadlines to adult and child sexual abuse cases. Additionally, the statute of limitations that applies is the one that existed at the time of your abuse. This means that even though the SOL may have been lengthened since the incident, it typically will not renew time-barred cases. "
 
Still doesn't make a possible groping a federal matter.

You're missing the point. Crime and federal have nothing to do with it. The conduct and who is telling the truth is what matters. Kavanaugh would have been better off if he had just admitted it and moved on.


admitted to a lie?

is that how you get past things?

Investigation is the best way to "get past things".

You just said he should admit to a lie

If it's true. He should also take a polygraph test and request an FBI investigation - like Dr. Ford.

again....

why should he ask the FBI to investigate something that didn't happen, in his opinion?

to prove a negative?
 
Sexual misconduct is not the same as rape. They were both teenagers AKA minors AKA not adults. and she doesn't remember anything....there is no case.

Hill & Thomas were both adults, and the accusations were more current at that time. There is a lot of difference between the two cases.


Now if Kavenaugh had other accusers since then showing a pattern, then you might have a case for the FBI to look into this case.
 
You're missing the point. Crime and federal have nothing to do with it. The conduct and who is telling the truth is what matters. Kavanaugh would have been better off if he had just admitted it and moved on.


admitted to a lie?

is that how you get past things?

Investigation is the best way to "get past things".

You just said he should admit to a lie

If it's true. He should also take a polygraph test and request an FBI investigation - like Dr. Ford.

again....

why should he ask the FBI to investigate something that didn't happen, in his opinion?

to prove a negative?

To remove the cloud. The Clarence Thomas cloud.
 
Maryland Statutes of Limitations for Sexual Abuse | LegalMatch Law Library

Seems MD does have a statute of limitation


and in this case its long past

Finally a link to a primary source...

Additionally, the statute of limitations that applies is the one that existed at the time of your abuse. This means that even though the SOL may have been lengthened since the incident, it typically will not renew time-barred cases.

So here's the deal. We DONT KNOW if it's sexual abuse or rape or sexual assault. And we should not confuse the laws FOR MINORS with the laws for adults in ANY of these cases. But I wager that CNN/MSNBC is in OVERDRIVE trying to tie a 4 month FBI investigation onto the Kavanaugh hearings is just tossing stinkbombs non-stop 24 hours.

Don't eat the MadCow....

BTW --- she was one of my favorite journalists when she wrote for The Nation mag. Until she got the MadCow disease, lost her journalism ethics and 1/2 her mind, and started to model Sean Hannity to be a success on TV..

 
Maryland Statutes of Limitations for Sexual Abuse | LegalMatch Law Library

Seems MD does have a statute of limitation


and in this case its long past

I recently heard it has been abolished.
The way law works in the US is no retro active laws are allowed. One can not be charged with a crime by a law that was created AFTER the supposed crime occurred, since there was a Statute of limitations when this supposed crime occurred and since the statute of limitations was achieved he can not now be charged by a new law. But more importantly she never claimed he tried to rape her.
 
admitted to a lie?

is that how you get past things?

Investigation is the best way to "get past things".

You just said he should admit to a lie

If it's true. He should also take a polygraph test and request an FBI investigation - like Dr. Ford.

again....

why should he ask the FBI to investigate something that didn't happen, in his opinion?

to prove a negative?

To remove the cloud. The Clarence Thomas cloud.

Clarence Thomas doesn't have a cloud...
 
Maryland Statutes of Limitations for Sexual Abuse | LegalMatch Law Library

Seems MD does have a statute of limitation


and in this case its long past

Finally a link to a primary source...

Additionally, the statute of limitations that applies is the one that existed at the time of your abuse. This means that even though the SOL may have been lengthened since the incident, it typically will not renew time-barred cases.

So here's the deal. We DONT KNOW if it's sexual abuse or rape or sexual assault. And we should not confuse the laws FOR MINORS with the laws for adults in ANY of these cases. But I wager that CNN/MSNBC is in OVERDRIVE trying to tie a 4 month FBI investigation onto the Kavanaugh hearings is just tossing stinkbombs non-stop 24 hours.

Don't eat the MadCow....

BTW --- she was one of my favorite journalists when she wrote for The Nation mag. Until she got the MadCow disease, lost her journalism ethics and 1/2 her mind, and started to model Sean Hannity to be a success on TV..

You lost all credibility at "MadCow"...
 
Investigation is the best way to "get past things".

You just said he should admit to a lie

If it's true. He should also take a polygraph test and request an FBI investigation - like Dr. Ford.

again....

why should he ask the FBI to investigate something that didn't happen, in his opinion?

to prove a negative?

To remove the cloud. The Clarence Thomas cloud.

Clarence Thomas doesn't have a cloud...

I beg to differ...

g9510-20_kavanaugh-cover.jpg
 
Maryland Statutes of Limitations for Sexual Abuse | LegalMatch Law Library

Seems MD does have a statute of limitation


and in this case its long past

Finally a link to a primary source...

Additionally, the statute of limitations that applies is the one that existed at the time of your abuse. This means that even though the SOL may have been lengthened since the incident, it typically will not renew time-barred cases.

So here's the deal. We DONT KNOW if it's sexual abuse or rape or sexual assault. And we should not confuse the laws FOR MINORS with the laws for adults in ANY of these cases. But I wager that CNN/MSNBC is in OVERDRIVE trying to tie a 4 month FBI investigation onto the Kavanaugh hearings is just tossing stinkbombs non-stop 24 hours.

Don't eat the MadCow....

BTW --- she was one of my favorite journalists when she wrote for The Nation mag. Until she got the MadCow disease, lost her journalism ethics and 1/2 her mind, and started to model Sean Hannity to be a success on TV..

You lost all credibility at "MadCow"...


You lost it long before that
 
In the Kavanaugh hearing regarding the very serious allegations of sexual assault?

The FBI was called on during the Clarence Thomas hearings to investigate the accusations made by Anita Hill.

That is how this is done. In fact Orin Hatch REQUESTED that investigation in that case, He KNOWS that is the "regular order".

What are they afraid of?

Not regular order when you've already had 6 THOROUGH FBI checks and several clearance updates by the FBI. Also not anything the FBI can address because there are no potential criminal charges due to statute of limitations.

FBI is NOT a political tool. Have her hire a private investigation team. You Dems need to stop thinking that the FBI is your personal Gestapo..
It's not?

But it was in the Thomas hearing.

Odd huh?

Thomas was employed at the EEOC at the time. Kavanaugh was not a federal employee in high school.
 
If Senate Republicans don't treat Dr. Ford with a reasonable degree of fairness and respect, she may feel compelled to file a criminal complaint against Kavanaugh in Maryland which could trigger a criminal investigation. This was discussed by Rachel Maddow earlier tonight.
In fact it's possible that were he confirmed...we might be treated to the "joy" of having a sitting Supreme Court Justice brought up on charges of attempted rape

Statute of limitations mean anything to you, libtard? Besides, he was a juvenile at the time. He would have to be tried in a Maryland family court! You really are dumber than a box of hammers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top