Ok so the era ended in the 20s, so there is no progressive Caucas?
Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren dont identify as progressive?
They may be "progressive" (adjective) but they can't be "Progressives" (noun). They're not old enough.
What you used above was the noun. Now you're trying to weasel your way into an adjective.
They do and yes I dont consider modern liberals as classical liberals, they're statists, not freedom lovers.
Then you're using the same term to mean two different things, which is why I note you don't understand it.
Stop playing semantics to try and show your intelligence, because its not working.
Liberals is a term for leftwingers in the US, if you dont know what, then you dont follow politics in the US.
Same as above. The fact that you don't know how to properly use a term is on you -- not the term.
And yes composition fallacy is a logic term that I dont buy, just like the fallacy of hasty generalization because to make points and to have a discussion, you have to use generalizarion, because noone can evalulate everone's point of view.
And no one can make a valid point with a Composition Fallacy. Doesn't matter if you 'buy' or not.
