BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 57,376
- 17,026
- 2,180
He'll be going in 2029......Jo needs to go simp
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He'll be going in 2029......Jo needs to go simp
He made those remark in March 2015. It wasn't until late 2015 that the Obama Administration realized that Shokin was not fighting corruption and must be forced out.Stefanik disagrees with you…
![]()
Top House Republican says 2015 Blinken speech contradicts Biden White House narrative on Shokin: 'Alarming'
Secretary of State Antony Blinken gave a 2015 speech praising Ukraine’s "anti-corruption" efforts just months before the Obama administration pushed for Viktor Shokin's firing.news.yahoo.com
Got it, 11 Mar 2014. Accordingly, (Shokin himself?) says that HB was on the Burisma board as early as Ap 2014.![]()
The money machine: how a high-profile corruption investigation fell apart
The long read: After a revolution overthrew Ukraine’s disgraced president, Theresa May promised to help the country’s new leaders recover stolen assets. But the UK’s first case collapsed within a yearwww.theguardian.com
That's nice, but what does that have to do with it?Got it, 11 Mar 2014. Accordingly, (Shokin himself?) says that HB was on the Burisma board as early as Ap 2014.
Who Pressured Who?If it's the case I remember, there was something like $25 million in assets frozen in Great Britain, and because Shokin dropped the prosecution, England had to return the money.
Refining the chron has to do with revealing what gesture(s) came first and from where.That's nice, but what does that have to do with it?
The State Dept was asking Shokin to investigate who at the PGO stonewalled the UK. They were probably taking a bribe from Zlochevsky, which would be pretty typical of how Ukraine had operated at that point in time and emblematic of the corruption they were trying to clean up.
If I had to guess, Zlochevsky probably had a bunch of prosecutors on his payroll if not Shokin himself.
Let's get to the details of the firing of Shokin.
Congress has a hearing that this came up in.
Seems it is Biden who is corrupt and not Shokin.
Garland has had to testify.
14K views 37 minutes ago
At a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) questioned Attorney General Merrick Garland about Burisma.
I think that is a low figure based on testimony at the congress hearing.Geez...we spend $42 million a year on snitches??? geez
Biden is as crooked as your teeth and a Home Depot 2x4Typical Lying Neo-GOP fascist tactic, never letting the questions get answered. What the fuck?
Fuck him.
That gives 2 x 4s an unfair stigmatization. The founder of Home Depot said that Joe Biden has never done an honest day's work in his life.Biden is as crooked as your teeth and a Home Depot 2x4
Troy Nehls was using his time to spread lies and Neo-GOP disinformation barely disguised as questions. He never allowed the Attorney General to answer his assertions.Biden is as crooked as your teeth and a Home Depot 2x4
That doesn't disprove my trolling pointTroy Nehls was using his time to spread lies and Neo-GOP disinformation barely disguised as questions. He never allowed the Attorney General to answer his assertions.
Let's get to the details of the firing of Shokin.
Congress has a hearing that this came up in.
Seems it is Biden who is corrupt and not Shokin.
Garland has had to testify.
14K views 37 minutes ago
At a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) questioned Attorney General Merrick Garland about Burisma.
His successor dropped all the charges, so how did that improve anything?LOLLOLLL
Shokin was NOT prosecuting ANY corruption in Ukraine.
You can PROVE he was by showing the cases that Shokin Prosecuted.
You are up to show the cases Shokin Prosecuted.
You mean from the 2012 investigation? What was Biden's role in that? Anything?His successor dropped all the charges, so how did that improve anything?
No one said they loved him they did however approve of what he was doing. Your twist and word play was weak bitchNowhere in that stupid article does it say that the Obama Admin “loved Shokin” or anything close to that.
There’s a whole shitload of “did not mentions”
How could he have done so?But America tires of wars super fast and Biden stepped in shit by not forcing the war to end quickly.
Let's get to the details of the firing of Shokin.
Congress has a hearing that this came up in.
Seems it is Biden who is corrupt and not Shokin.
Garland has had to testify.
14K views 37 minutes ago
At a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) questioned Attorney General Merrick Garland about Burisma.