Why is the M5M largely ignoring the FBI agent texts?

ColonelAngus

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
26,164
Reaction score
11,545
Points
950
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
26,164
Reaction score
11,545
Points
950
Because they are a propaganda machine designed to gather votes for the rotten vegetable.
This is NEWS....so CNN is not NEWS. They are Dim propoganda.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
26,164
Reaction score
11,545
Points
950
You left wing useless sheep need to wake up and read Alinsky”s 12 rules radicals.

HILLARY CLINTON’S MENTOR

 

forkup

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Messages
5,397
Reaction score
902
Points
195
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.

See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

I understand the need to give the most nefarious explanation for everything to push a narrative but the reason it's not covered is because the need to defend your actions is not the same as admitting or even being likely guilty. Luckely for your candidate I would assert.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
26,164
Reaction score
11,545
Points
950
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.



See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

Go ahead and excuse it all away. Read the entire article and explain it all away.

Did you even Mueller? Trump and Putin colluding to steal the electon was a big fat fucking lie, perpetuated by the lying media and left wing useless sheep who slurp up the lies from the MSM.

Read all the texts,you dolt.
 

iceberg

Gold Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
28,447
Reaction score
7,052
Points
290
because it destroys what they've been selling for 4 years.

if it becomes profitable for them to agree it happened, they'll do it.
 

iceberg

Gold Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
28,447
Reaction score
7,052
Points
290
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.

See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

I understand the need to give the most nefarious explanation for everything to push a narrative but the reason it's not covered is because the need to defend your actions is not the same as admitting or even being likely guilty. Luckely for your candidate I would assert.
if you are acting inside the accordance of the law, then you shouldn't be worried about having to defend your actions. the legal system does that.

anything else is acting OUTSIDE that system and you need "insurance" for when it all falls down on you.
 

Maxdeath

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Messages
5,908
Reaction score
3,824
Points
1,050
You are kidding right? No one that deserves it goes to jail in D.C.
Maybe if people demand long enough and hard enough they may throw some junior agent under the bus and pretend that it is all taken care of.
D.C. was literally corrupt and has been for years. It did get a lot worse under 44.
 

forkup

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Messages
5,397
Reaction score
902
Points
195
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.



See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

Go ahead and excuse it all away. Read the entire article and explain it all away.

Did you even Mueller? Trump and Putin colluding to steal the electon was a big fat fucking lie, perpetuated by the lying media and left wing useless sheep who slurp up the lies from the MSM.

Read all the texts,you dolt.
What do you think I need to excuse? FBI agents fearing they will need legal representation when investigating the campaign of someone running for president? Not for nothing do you feel the need to excuse anyone taking a lawyer when giving testimony under oath.

As for the article. No as a matter of fact I didn't. I read the actual report as I read the actual Mueller report. The entire thing and then proceded to form my own opinion. Maybe you should try it?
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
26,164
Reaction score
11,545
Points
950
“We have some loose ends to tie up, and we all need to meet to discuss what to do with each case (he said shut down Razor),” one agent texted, referring to Crossfire Razor, the FBI’s internal code name for the investigation of Flynn.

o glad they’re closing Razor,” an agent responded.


NOTHING TO SEE HERE. :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:

forkup

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Messages
5,397
Reaction score
902
Points
195
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.

See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

I understand the need to give the most nefarious explanation for everything to push a narrative but the reason it's not covered is because the need to defend your actions is not the same as admitting or even being likely guilty. Luckely for your candidate I would assert.
if you are acting inside the accordance of the law, then you shouldn't be worried about having to defend your actions. the legal system does that.

anything else is acting OUTSIDE that system and you need "insurance" for when it all falls down on you.
Really it does? That's why a judge if you appear before him strongly discourages anyone from representing themself?
 

iceberg

Gold Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
28,447
Reaction score
7,052
Points
290
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.

See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

I understand the need to give the most nefarious explanation for everything to push a narrative but the reason it's not covered is because the need to defend your actions is not the same as admitting or even being likely guilty. Luckely for your candidate I would assert.
if you are acting inside the accordance of the law, then you shouldn't be worried about having to defend your actions. the legal system does that.

anything else is acting OUTSIDE that system and you need "insurance" for when it all falls down on you.
Really it does? That's why a judge if you appear before him strongly discourages anyone from representing themself?
what does getting legal council have to do with buying insurance for your actions?

do you often go "shit, i'm going to go buy groceries, i better get some liability insurance in case i do something wrong"?

crock of shit. sorry.
 

Angelo

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
22,371
Reaction score
8,107
Points
910
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


Unbelievable double standard used by Obama's rogue team.

“We all went and purchased professional liability insurance,” one agent texted on Jan. 10, 2017, the same day CNN leaked details that then-President-elect Trump had been briefed by Comey about the bogus Christopher Steele dossier. That briefing of Trump was used as a pretext to legitimize the debunked dossier, which was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign and compiled by a foreign intelligence officer who was working for a sanctioned Russian oligarch.
 

forkup

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Messages
5,397
Reaction score
902
Points
195
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.

See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

I understand the need to give the most nefarious explanation for everything to push a narrative but the reason it's not covered is because the need to defend your actions is not the same as admitting or even being likely guilty. Luckely for your candidate I would assert.
if you are acting inside the accordance of the law, then you shouldn't be worried about having to defend your actions. the legal system does that.

anything else is acting OUTSIDE that system and you need "insurance" for when it all falls down on you.
Really it does? That's why a judge if you appear before him strongly discourages anyone from representing themself?
what does getting legal council have to do with buying insurance for your actions?

do you often go "shit, i'm going to go buy groceries, i better get some liability insurance in case i do something wrong"?

crock of shit. sorry.
Bying groceries isn't exactly the same as investigating a campaign for president. Last time I checked its pretty unlikely there will be a congressional hearing because Linda checked if the tomato was ripe. Something that is a certainty when going after a Presidential candidate.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
26,164
Reaction score
11,545
Points
950
Straight up smoking gun. Federal agents say TRUMP WAS RIGHT AND THEY BOUGHT PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.

This is all over CNN, right?


So feeling the need to take out personal liability insurance is a "smoking gun"?

Is that always true or just in this case? Is it true for instance in the case of a White House staffer who's afraid he or she will be called to testify before congress?

If so I can assure you the Trump administration has lots of smoking guns.

See you take out an insurance like that when you fear you might be called to defend your actions. Considering the fact that this entire investigation has been the target of at least 3 separate investigations, not an outrageous assumption.

I understand the need to give the most nefarious explanation for everything to push a narrative but the reason it's not covered is because the need to defend your actions is not the same as admitting or even being likely guilty. Luckely for your candidate I would assert.
if you are acting inside the accordance of the law, then you shouldn't be worried about having to defend your actions. the legal system does that.

anything else is acting OUTSIDE that system and you need "insurance" for when it all falls down on you.
Really it does? That's why a judge if you appear before him strongly discourages anyone from representing themself?
Read the article and address the texts between agents.
 

ImAlwaysRight

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
378
Reaction score
889
Points
158
Location
Texas
You left wing useless sheep need to wake up and read Alinsky”s 12 rules radicals.

HILLARY CLINTON’S MENTOR

They've been reading, living and breathing marxist Alinsky, they just didn't know it.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top