Why is the left so eager to believe and propogate Assad's propaganda?

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Two hour notice was given. The strike was against a military target.

Despite those two points the left believes that a strike on a military objective killed 0 soldiers & 9 civilians based on reports propagated by THE ENEMY.

 

[Pete7469]

Two hour notice was given. The strike was against a military target.

Despite those two points the left believes that a strike on a military objective killed 0 soldiers & 9 civilians based on reports propagated by THE ENEMY.

If the meat puppet faggot had launched a strike that killed 900 civilians, the bed wetters would call them syrian military contractors.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria.

"The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria."

Or when he destroyed Libya.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria.

"The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria."

Or when he destroyed Libya.

Or tried to interfere in Egypt

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria.

"The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria."

Or when he destroyed Libya.

Or tried to interfere in Egypt

Yes and with Egypt they never had a problem when Obama openly supported The Muslim Brotherhood taking over Egypt....oh hold on, I forgot, the Leftist Maniacs support types like The Muslim Brotherhood, they can't get enough of that Islamist Jungle Juice

 

[toomuchtime_]

Two hour notice was given. The strike was against a military target.

Despite those two points the left believes that a strike on a military objective killed 0 soldiers & 9 civilians based on reports propagated by THE ENEMY.

It's because they haven't gotten today's talking points yet.


Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi broke with fellow Democrats who had criticized President Trump's military action against Syria to endorse the move late Thursday.

"Making sure Assad knows that when he commits such despicable atrocities he will pay a price is the right thing to do," Schumer said in a statement released late Thursday. "I salute the professionalism and skill of our Armed Forces who took action today."

"Tonight's strike in Syria appears to be a proportional response to the the regime's use of chemical weapons," Pelosi said in a statement.

Chuck Schumer: Missile launch 'the right thing to do'

• • 
    1:13
    
    
    
  • 
    0:37
    
    
• • 
    4:45
    
    
    
  • 
    1:10
    
    
• • 
    1:13
    
    
    
  • 
    0:37
    
    
• • 
    4:45
    
    
    
  • 
    1:10
    
    

 

[irosie91]

The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria.

"The left loons didn't utter a peep when Obama ordered military strikes in Syria."

Or when he destroyed Libya.

Or tried to interfere in Egypt

Yes and with Egypt they never had a problem when Obama openly supported The Muslim Brotherhood taking over Egypt....oh hold on, I forgot, the Leftist Maniacs support types like The Muslim Brotherhood, they can't get enough of that Islamist Jungle Juice

a favorite child of the "LEFT" has been the BAATHIST PIGS since the
inception of the perversity-----Baathists always have RUSSIAN SUPPORT----
almost a "tradition" and some jerks get bamboozled by the
"egalitarian" claim of that totalitarian utopian genocidal creed

 

[Unkotare]

Two hour notice was given. The strike was against a military target.

Despite those two points the left believes that a strike on a military objective killed 0 soldiers & 9 civilians based on reports propagated by THE ENEMY.

"Why is the left so eager to believe and propogate Assad's propaganda?"

Why? Because they have something in common with Assad: A deep and abiding hatred of America.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Silence from resident leftists.....


Why?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Apparently logic is looked upon as a terminal disease by the left. I can think of no other explanation for their absence in this thread.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I remember the right spending several years condemning Obama for supporting ISIL by attacking Assad.

 

[toomuchtime_]

I remember the right spending several years condemning Obama for supporting ISIL by attacking Assad.

It's a bad sign when your memory starts to do. What you remember is the right condemning Obama for only rhetorically attacking Assad. Now that we finally have a President who takes action instead of just talking about it, it appears to have disturbed your mental balance.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I remember the right spending several years condemning Obama for supporting ISIL by attacking Assad.

It's a bad sign when your memory starts to do. What you remember is the right condemning Obama for only rhetorically attacking Assad. Now that we finally have a President who takes action instead of just talking about it, it appears to have disturbed your mental balance.

Why is attacking Assad and helping ISIL under Obama bad, but under Trump good? Go.

 

[nat4900]

Two hour notice was given. The strike was against a military target.

Despite those two points the left believes that a strike on a military objective killed 0 soldiers & 9 civilians based on reports propagated by THE ENEMY.

BEIRUT — Residents of the Syrian town devastated by a chemical-weapons attack earlier this week said that warplanes had returned to bomb them Saturday as Turkey described a retaliatory U.S. assault as “cosmetic” unless President Bashar al-Assad is removed from power.

The U.S. military launched 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian military airfield early Friday in the first direct American assault on Assad’s government since that country’s six-year civil war began. Although American officials have predicted that the strikes would result in a major shift of Assad’s calculus, they appear to be symbolic in practice.

Within 24 hours of the American strikes, monitoring groups reported that jets were once again taking off from the bombed Shayrat air base.

Warplanes return to Syrian town devastated by chemical attack

 

[toomuchtime_]

I remember the right spending several years condemning Obama for supporting ISIL by attacking Assad.

It's a bad sign when your memory starts to do. What you remember is the right condemning Obama for only rhetorically attacking Assad. Now that we finally have a President who takes action instead of just talking about it, it appears to have disturbed your mental balance.

Why is attacking Assad and helping ISIL under Obama bad, but under Trump good? Go.

Obama didn't attack Assad, he talked about attacking Assad while he attacked ISIS, effectively helping Assad.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I remember the right spending several years condemning Obama for supporting ISIL by attacking Assad.

It's a bad sign when your memory starts to do. What you remember is the right condemning Obama for only rhetorically attacking Assad. Now that we finally have a President who takes action instead of just talking about it, it appears to have disturbed your mental balance.

Why is attacking Assad and helping ISIL under Obama bad, but under Trump good? Go.

Obama never attacked assad lol.

He was content trying to lecture him like a child.

Now would you care to actually comment ON TOPIC?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Two hour notice was given. The strike was against a military target.

Despite those two points the left believes that a strike on a military objective killed 0 soldiers & 9 civilians based on reports propagated by THE ENEMY.

BEIRUT — Residents of the Syrian town devastated by a chemical-weapons attack earlier this week said that warplanes had returned to bomb them Saturday as Turkey described a retaliatory U.S. assault as “cosmetic” unless President Bashar al-Assad is removed from power.

The U.S. military launched 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian military airfield early Friday in the first direct American assault on Assad’s government since that country’s six-year civil war began. Although American officials have predicted that the strikes would result in a major shift of Assad’s calculus, they appear to be symbolic in practice.

Within 24 hours of the American strikes, monitoring groups reported that jets were once again taking off from the bombed Shayrat air base.

Warplanes return to Syrian town devastated by chemical attack

Another one who is incapable of addressing the point made in the op.

 

[imawhosure]

I remember the right spending several years condemning Obama for supporting ISIL by attacking Assad.

It's a bad sign when your memory starts to do. What you remember is the right condemning Obama for only rhetorically attacking Assad. Now that we finally have a President who takes action instead of just talking about it, it appears to have disturbed your mental balance.

Why is attacking Assad and helping ISIL under Obama bad, but under Trump good? Go.

How soon you forget!

1. Did not Obama cut a deal to get rid of all the chemical weapons out of Syria?

2. Were WE not one of the countries who promised this, along with Russia?

3. Was not Russia supposed to execute the joint plan?

4. Did not the last administration tell all of us that the weapons were now removed? In other words, either the Russians lied to Obama, or Obama lied to us, take your choice!

5. Since the weapons were NOT ALL removed, was not President Trump enforcing Obama's red line? AND, if Obama's red line was good then, why is it not good now!

EXPLAIN!

 

[TheOldSchool]

I remember the right spending several years condemning Obama for supporting ISIL by attacking Assad.

It's a bad sign when your memory starts to do. What you remember is the right condemning Obama for only rhetorically attacking Assad. Now that we finally have a President who takes action instead of just talking about it, it appears to have disturbed your mental balance.

Why is attacking Assad and helping ISIL under Obama bad, but under Trump good? Go.

Obama didn't attack Assad, he talked about attacking Assad while he attacked ISIS, effectively helping Assad.

Wow. Just going to pretend that the main argument the GOP used against Obama for years and years never existed for the sake of this argument, huh? What little self-respect you must have.