Man, this is getting so tiring.
I bitched just as much about Bush.
Here is a pro-tip for you: instead of saying "it's okay to kill folks cuz Bush did it", why don't you question why you support anyone, regardless of the R or D next to their name, who kills innocent people?
I will say this though, Obama assassinated a US Citizen without due process, Bush never did that.
I have no problem targeting and killing traitors who are planning more attacks on Americans. Awlaki had taken a lead in planning and directing efforts to murder innocent Americans and was also directly responsible for the death of many Yemeni citizens.
That said, I do wish they would stop the blind drone strikes and secondary drone strikes aimed at first responders.
Says who? No court of law that is for sure. He has due process as a citizen and you should want that protected for everyone incase you need it someday. If you are fine with one man being able to decide who lives and who dies, well, fu lol
Ken Anderson, who teaches at American University's Washington College of Law and follows U.S. policy on drones, says the analysis starts with whether Awlaki amounted to a lawful target — U.S. citizen or not.
"The U.S has always seen somebody who is planning attacks against the United States as a lawful target," Anderson says.
Either because Awlaki presented an imminent threat to American citizens or because he had become an enemy fighting alongside al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, Anderson says, he could be seen as a lawful target.
Anderson says in the legal analysis, the place where a target is located matters too.
"[The government's] standard is we're not going to be targeting somebody in London or Paris or someplace that's got the effective rule of law," Anderson says.
But by hiding in Yemen, Awlaki couldn't be served with a subpoena or easily taken into custody, putting himself in a different category.
The Justice Department wouldn't talk about specific operations or individuals. Nor did it want to describe the process the government used to put Awlaki on a target list.
One administration official did agree to speak in general about targeting terrorists. "We're not commenting on any specific individual or operation," the official said. "As a general matter, it would be entirely lawful for the United States to target high-level leaders of enemy forces, regardless of their nationality, who are plotting to kill Americans both under the authority provided by Congress in its use of military force in the armed conflict with al-Qaida, the Taliban, and associated forces as well as established international law that recognizes our right of self-defense."
Experts say that while it might not be required under the law, it would make good political sense to share more information with Congress and the public. Awlaki's case might be the first case to present these difficult questions, but it won't be the last.
Debate Erupts Over Legality Of Awlaki's Killing : NPR