Why is it to threat to Democracy to say 2020 was stolen, but not a threat to Democracy to say 2016 was stolen?

[ColonelAngus]

I keep forgetting why one is good and one is bad.

Can you guys remind me?

This has nothing to do with 2024…though I am sure the same splits will occur.

Many people say 2016 was stolen. They are not censored or deplatformed.

Many people say 2020 was stolen. Many of these people are censored and deplatformed.

I cannot figure out why one is good and one is bad.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

In 2024, we have a hand selected candidate who did not win a single primary.

Look no further.

 

[The Duke]

Stop being facetious.

 

[ColonelAngus]

In 2024, we have a hand selected candidate who did not win a single primary.

Look no further.

That seems UNDEMOCRATIC.

Say, did the DNC **** over Bernie Sanders twice when it was apparent he was going to win the nomination?

Did Bernie supporters lose in court because the DNC claimed they are a private organization and they can pick whomever they want to run? The primaries are just a show…..AND THEY WON THE CASE?

YES.


THAT HAPPENED. THE DNC ADMITTED THEY RIG PRIMARIES.

 

[DStar777]

I keep forgetting why one is good and one is bad.

Trump triggers anxiety in people. you just can't have that.

 

[sealybobo]

I keep forgetting why one is good and one is bad.

Can you guys remind me?

This has nothing to do with 2024…though I am sure the same splits will occur.

Many people say 2016 was stolen. They are not censored or deplatformed.

Many people say 2020 was stolen. Many of these people are censored and deplatformed.

I cannot figure out why one is good and one is bad.

2016 may have been stolen. But we didn't keep crying when they denies Jill Stein a recount in Michigan. Trump only won MI by like 10,000 votes. Remember he called Georgia and asked them to find him 11,000 votes like that should be no problem? Maybe Republican Gov Rick Snyder found him those 10,000 votes in 2016.

Then Trump appointed Rick Snyder's boss' wife to run the Department of Education. Seems fishy to me.

2000 was stolen. 2020 wasn't. That's why it's a threat to democracy to say 2020 was stolen. It undermines our election process. But the truth is, 2000 was actually stolen.

What's a threat is Trump tried to rig 2020 and will try to rig 2028 if he's the President then. Fake electors. Trying to get Mike Pence to pull a fast one. Vergogna you little *****.

 

[Blaster]

Clinton blamed Trump for colluding with Russia and said that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Nobody chastised her for that.

 

[Papageorgio]

I keep forgetting why one is good and one is bad.

Can you guys remind me?

This has nothing to do with 2024…though I am sure the same splits will occur.

Many people say 2016 was stolen. They are not censored or deplatformed.

Many people say 2020 was stolen. Many of these people are censored and deplatformed.

I cannot figure out why one is good and one is bad.

Many say 2000 and 2004, 2016, 2020 were all stolen. It’s all partisan BS.

 

[The Duke]

Many say 2000 and 2004, 2016, 2020 were all stolen. It’s all partisan BS.

Meh, I say 2000 was stolen by Jeb!
2020 was stolen, too.
Obama had them test vote cheating in PA in 2012 as well.
He would have won anyway, because Romney is just bad.

 

[Papageorgio]

2016 may have been stolen. But we didn't keep crying when they denies Jill Stein a recount in Michigan. Trump only won MI by like 10,000 votes. Remember he called Georgia and asked them to find him 11,000 votes like that should be no problem? Maybe Republican Gov Rick Snyder found him those 10,000 votes in 2016.

Then Trump appointed Rick Snyder's boss' wife to run the Department of Education. Seems fishy to me.

2000 was stolen. 2020 wasn't. That's why it's a threat to democracy to say 2020 was stolen. It undermines our election process. But the truth is, 2000 was actually stolen.

What's a threat is Trump tried to rig 2020 and will try to rig 2028 if he's the President then. Fake electors. Trying to get Mike Pence to pull a fast one. Vergogna you little *****.

Except had no authority to seal the election the election for anyone but Biden.

The rest of your post is proven partisan bullshit.

 

[Mac1958]

So we're going to pretend that the two candidates and parties handled it the same way?

Absolutely incredible. Holy crap.

 

[sealybobo]

Except had no authority to seal the election the election for anyone but Biden.

The rest of your post is proven partisan bullshit.

Huh? If Pence would have gone along, it would have possibly sent the decision for who won to the Supreme Court. Like 2000.

Another hope was that each Senator would get 1 vote. Then I believe Trump would have won that too.

Or the House. If every house member voted Trump would have won. Right?

That was the point of starting a riot. To stop the process.

WHO KNOWS what would have happened if Mike Pence went along. Who knows. And I can't believe you're willing to give the guy another shot. Because you're a sexist homophobic white dude retard.

 

[Papageorgio]

Huh? If Pence would have gone along, it would have possibly sent the decision for who won to the Supreme Court. Like 2000.

Another hope was that each Senator would get 1 vote. Then I believe Trump would have won that too.

Or the House. If every house member voted Trump would have won. Right?

That was the point of starting a riot. To stop the process.

WHO KNOWS what would have happened if Mike Pence went along. Who knows. And I can't believe you're willing to give the guy another shot. Because you're a sexist homophobic white dude retard.

Absolutely wrong, I have read so many articles that tell us otherwise and you nut jobs keep lying. I am not giving him another shot the American people are giving him another shot because they know like I do most of the far left is like the far right, full of bullshit!

On Pence’s role:
The Constitution directs the president of the Senate to open the certificates of the election results from the states in the presence of the Senate and House and instructs that the votes “shall then be counted,” said Garrett Epps, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Oregon. He noted that the vice president is not explicitly referenced. However, the vice president serves as president of the Senate; if absent, the senior most senator from the majority party serves in that role.

That language indicates Congress — not just the president of the Senate — is to count the votes, Epps said, and doesn’t afford the vice president any special power to overturn them.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Democrats are planning for civil war.

Democrats just gave the military authorization to kill Americans.

Democrats are traitors working with the WEF on a plot to intentionally collapse America and usher in the great reset.

Democrats = traitors

 

[Yarddog]

Huh? If Pence would have gone along, it would have possibly sent the decision for who won to the Supreme Court. Like 2000.

Another hope was that each Senator would get 1 vote. Then I believe Trump would have won that too.

Or the House. If every house member voted Trump would have won. Right?

That was the point of starting a riot. To stop the process.

WHO KNOWS what would have happened if Mike Pence went along. Who knows. And I can't believe you're willing to give the guy another shot. Because you're a sexist homophobic white dude retard.

One Party got their operatives in the FBI, and news outlets to run a 24/7 narrative that Trump was a Russian operative(colluding with Russia), going as far as falsifying documents to get a search warrant, In an attempt to oust a president they didnt want. Same thing with the PHONE CALL to Ukraine.. Dems just constantly looking for a way to get rid of this guy. Not exactly a coup, but when you use the media and government agencies nefariously. its an attempt for the same result.

I do agree though, at some point Trump should have, and would have been better off, just making his point and re- tooling for the next election, instead of trying to sway electors. He would have gained more political
strength that way .

There was no point to starting a riot. A riot went counter to whatever Trump was trying to do that day. It pretty much killed whatever he was trying to accomplish

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

I keep forgetting why one is good and one is bad.

Can you guys remind me?

This has nothing to do with 2024…though I am sure the same splits will occur.

Many people say 2016 was stolen. They are not censored or deplatformed.

Many people say 2020 was stolen. Many of these people are censored and deplatformed.

I cannot figure out why one is good and one is bad.

Cause you're a threat to demockwacy!

Jann6th

Hitler

 

[Michael1985]

Saying either election was stolen is pure hyper-partisan bullshit. Likewise about 2000 as well.

 

[krichton]

Who precisely is saying 2016 was stolen? LOL. More idiot rhetoric and lies from more idiot maga idiots.

 

[sealybobo]

Absolutely wrong, I have read so many articles that tell us otherwise and you nut jobs keep lying. I am not giving him another shot the American people are giving him another shot because they know like I do most of the far left is like the far right, full of bullshit!

On Pence’s role:
The Constitution directs the president of the Senate to open the certificates of the election results from the states in the presence of the Senate and House and instructs that the votes “shall then be counted,” said Garrett Epps, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Oregon. He noted that the vice president is not explicitly referenced. However, the vice president serves as president of the Senate; if absent, the senior most senator from the majority party serves in that role.

That language indicates Congress — not just the president of the Senate — is to count the votes, Epps said, and doesn’t afford the vice president any special power to overturn them.

If you think trump is a serious candidate you’re a Nazi. Not all Nazis are evil. My brothers not evil but he’s one too

 

[Papageorgio]

If you think trump is a serious candidate you’re a Nazi. Not all Nazis are evil. My brothers not evil but he’s one too

That is a pretty stupid moronic statement, he is within 1% of Harris and he isn’t a serious candidate? lol! How stupid!