Why Is FOXNEWS Giving The Trayvon Martin Story Little To No Coverage?

[Katzndogz]

I love it, a bunch of thugs say SAY, that their were motivated by the victim's use of a racial slur. It's the answer for everything! All thugs have to do is make the claim and immediately the crime, whatever it is is justified. That's how it works. It's a license to kill.

 

[paperview]

I love it, a bunch of thugs say SAY, that their were motivated by the victim's use of a racial slur. It's the answer for everything! All thugs have to do is make the claim and immediately the crime, whatever it is is justified. That's how it works. It's a license to kill.

You're not making a speck of sense.

 

[old navy]

Meanwhile, MSNBC has gotten back on the Obama campaign.

 

[taichiliberal]

Well well, another day of freedom for George Zimmerman. Despite the enormous pressure to arrest him, despite the special prosecutor, despite the FBI, no arrest. Unless you think that everyone is racist and hates Martin, it is very likely that Zimmerman's story of the events checks out and that he acted in self-defense. The Grand Jury will convene in three days, if it even gets to a G.J, and he's not in custody. It isn't looking good for the lynch mob.

Stop braying like an ass.....asking for the police to do their job's and arrest a guy on evidence that would do so for anyone else UNLESS THEY HAD A POLICE CHIEF AND A STATE PROSECUTOR INTERFERING AND IGNORING EVIDENCE is NOT a "lynch mob".

How in the world you can say Zimmerman's story checks out when there is CONCRETE, DOCUMENTED AUDIO AND VIDEO evidence that contradicts his story? His lawyers are trying this case in the public court, and the evidence is making a fool of them.

But hey, so long as cretins like YOU have their warped sense of racial importance and security massaged....facts, logic and justice are all up for grabs.

But it ain't over until he fat lady sings, bunky.

 

[taichiliberal]

I love it, a bunch of thugs say SAY, that their were motivated by the victim's use of a racial slur. It's the answer for everything! All thugs have to do is make the claim and immediately the crime, whatever it is is justified. That's how it works. It's a license to kill.

You're not making a speck of sense.

He's an idiot like the rest of the neocon/teabagger parrots on this thread. Limbaugh and Rove calls Obama a "thug", are aped by the rest of he neocon punditry..and then fools like Katzndogz apply it to their ridiculous rants.

It doesn't have to make sense to them...it just has to sound good.

 

[taichiliberal]

These "crimes" seem to be directly connected to the Zimmerman/Martin case. If there are cases where others do crimes because the press inflamed the tensions, please let me know.

"Seem" is the operative word, my would be genius. But if you need proof of black folk being victims of a crime inflamed by the press, you need look no further than the INCREASE in hate crimes against blacks an other minorities since the election of Obama...you know, after institutions like Fox News and such screamed "anti-American, secret muslim, racist, gonna take your guns" even AFTER the man was elected.

Hate crimes against blacks, religious groups rise - USATODAY.com

You're NOT going to shift the topic from the FACTS that keep tearing down the excuses Zimmerman's lawyers keep spit balling in the press....but I know insipidly stubborn and willfully ignorant cusses with a grudge against "those people" like YOU will keep trying.

Carry on.

The six "youths" told the 78 year old man they were beating it was for "Trayvon", and you want to discuss "willfully ignorant"?
The "facts" are unknown. A terrible tragedy occurred. One person is dead. One person will have to live with the taking of a human life. Now here are some questions for you.
If you see a suspicious person, is it okay to investigate (from a distance)?
If you see a person acting different, is it okay to investigate (could be a medical problem)?
Do you have a right to beat someone because they "seem" to be following you?
How long of a distance should you walk before you confront someone walking the same direction as you?
How many times should you allow yourself to be hit, if you have the means to defend yourself?
At what point do you decide someone is hurting you (after they punch you/after they put you on the ground and don't stop/after they use concrete or pavement to pound your head/after your brains are spilling out of your broken skull)?
Do you have the right to defend yourself against someone that is smaller than you (some of the most wicked fighters are fairly small)?

Everyone, EVERYONE never wants to see an incident like this again (if it was a woman that had been raped, she would be told she should have known better than to dress that way, or be walking alone in that neighborhood). Instead of calling for a public lynching (something too many black community organizers are doing), we should be discussing how this could be avoided in the future.
If you are in an area where there is crime, you do not dress or act like a burglar.
If you are part of a neighborhood watch, pair up, and have reflective clothing that identifies you as something other than a thug.
You don't beat someone for following you.
You don't shoot someone that is walking "on the sidewalk".
If you choose to speak to someone on the street, do it respectfully, and with purpose.
Understand that people are terrified; they do not want to be victims of crime and will do a lot to avoid having their families hurt. Be considerate, and do not try to intimidate others.

In short, if either of these people had acted differently, this tradgedy would not have happened. Let's use it to educate and reduce the risk of it happening again.

Notice folks, that when this neocon/teabagger gasbag was presented with DOCUMENTED FACTS that DISPROVED his assertion, he doesn't have the intellectual honesty or courage to acknowledge such. Instead, we're barraged with a multitude of suppostion and conjecture that wholly ignores the true FACTS of the case at hand, and instead just regurgitates ALREADY DISPROVEN assertions regarding the Zimmerman/Martin case.

FACT: audio documentation clearly has Zimmerman stating that Martin is RUNNING AWAY from him (after initially inspecting the car to see who was following him), and when the dispatch asks if Zimmerman is following, he replies "yes". The dispatch, after PREVIOUSLY confirming that the police are on their way, says "we don't need you to do that", to which Zimmerman confirms "okay".

Yet, Zimmerman DID CONTINUE TO PURSUE Martin, who's only "crime" was being black, wearing a hoodie IN THE RAIN, and coming under Zimmerman's warped consideration. You don't yell, "self defense" after you initiate a confrontation, that's like yelling foul after you start a fight and lose.

Later, physical evidence documented by police surveillance cameras DOES NOT SUPPORT OR CORROBORATE the tale Zimmerman's lawyer relates that Martin bloodied his nose and bashed his skull on the ground via attacking him.

The chief of detectives didn't buy Zimmerman's story based on the evidence, but was prevented from arresting him via interference by the chief of police and the State attorney, BOTH of whom suddenly recuse themselves from the case.

Naa-unnh bunky, all this hoop-la for what looks like manslaughter stinks...and what's at stake is what appears to be a petty, local cover-up that's inadvertently tied to the "Stand Your Ground" law.

I wonder if Trayvon had killed Zimmerman would dopes like YOU be railing for his defense? Anyway, do continue to blow neocon/teabagger smoke on this one.

 

[paulitician]

"It's fuckin cold." Whoops! Democrat Race-Baiters are bleepin assholes. Fuck em.

 

[beagle9]

It's the biggest, hottest news story in media.

Are they not a media company interesting in keeping the populate updated on the latest and greatest and hottest news?

Any of you wager to guess why such little coverage for the biggest, most powerful media organization on the world?

Why ? Because as your last words state, they are the biggest and hottest news agency in the world, where as this case will not make or break them in the least, and by being the biggest in the world, thay have to move on quicker than the others do, and so they have moved on more or less, in order to let the athorities handle it from here on out, as they are doing and the others should do as well, but some news agencies have almost eveything they have riding on this case, so they have to keep it hot, because if it fails them in the least now, then they feel they will be made complete fools of afterwards, especially since they have invested so much coverage into one case and still do, in which isn't much different from so many of the hundreds of thousands more cases that are also relevant in America, and are happening all across America day by day..

So the question is or should be, why isn't the media giving all the other cases in America equal time and airplay like this one, because trust me the problems in America (((DON"T))) hang on this one case, but for some politically driven mostly "media outlets", they have everything hanging on this one case, and this is because they have made it that way for political reasons (?), in which could make them or break them in the end.

 

[logical4u]

"Seem" is the operative word, my would be genius. But if you need proof of black folk being victims of a crime inflamed by the press, you need look no further than the INCREASE in hate crimes against blacks an other minorities since the election of Obama...you know, after institutions like Fox News and such screamed "anti-American, secret muslim, racist, gonna take your guns" even AFTER the man was elected.

Hate crimes against blacks, religious groups rise - USATODAY.com

You're NOT going to shift the topic from the FACTS that keep tearing down the excuses Zimmerman's lawyers keep spit balling in the press....but I know insipidly stubborn and willfully ignorant cusses with a grudge against "those people" like YOU will keep trying.

Carry on.

The six "youths" told the 78 year old man they were beating it was for "Trayvon", and you want to discuss "willfully ignorant"?
The "facts" are unknown. A terrible tragedy occurred. One person is dead. One person will have to live with the taking of a human life. Now here are some questions for you.
If you see a suspicious person, is it okay to investigate (from a distance)?
If you see a person acting different, is it okay to investigate (could be a medical problem)?
Do you have a right to beat someone because they "seem" to be following you?
How long of a distance should you walk before you confront someone walking the same direction as you?
How many times should you allow yourself to be hit, if you have the means to defend yourself?
At what point do you decide someone is hurting you (after they punch you/after they put you on the ground and don't stop/after they use concrete or pavement to pound your head/after your brains are spilling out of your broken skull)?
Do you have the right to defend yourself against someone that is smaller than you (some of the most wicked fighters are fairly small)?

Everyone, EVERYONE never wants to see an incident like this again (if it was a woman that had been raped, she would be told she should have known better than to dress that way, or be walking alone in that neighborhood). Instead of calling for a public lynching (something too many black community organizers are doing), we should be discussing how this could be avoided in the future.
If you are in an area where there is crime, you do not dress or act like a burglar.
If you are part of a neighborhood watch, pair up, and have reflective clothing that identifies you as something other than a thug.
You don't beat someone for following you.
You don't shoot someone that is walking "on the sidewalk".
If you choose to speak to someone on the street, do it respectfully, and with purpose.
Understand that people are terrified; they do not want to be victims of crime and will do a lot to avoid having their families hurt. Be considerate, and do not try to intimidate others.

In short, if either of these people had acted differently, this tradgedy would not have happened. Let's use it to educate and reduce the risk of it happening again.

Notice folks, that when this neocon/teabagger gasbag was presented with DOCUMENTED FACTS that DISPROVED his assertion, he doesn't have the intellectual honesty or courage to acknowledge such. Instead, we're barraged with a multitude of suppostion and conjecture that wholly ignores the true FACTS of the case at hand, and instead just regurgitates ALREADY DISPROVEN assertions regarding the Zimmerman/Martin case.

FACT: audio documentation clearly has Zimmerman stating that Martin is RUNNING AWAY from him (after initially inspecting the car to see who was following him), and when the dispatch asks if Zimmerman is following, he replies "yes". The dispatch, after PREVIOUSLY confirming that the police are on their way, says "we don't need you to do that", to which Zimmerman confirms "okay".

Yet, Zimmerman DID CONTINUE TO PURSUE Martin, who's only "crime" was being black, wearing a hoodie IN THE RAIN, and coming under Zimmerman's warped consideration. You don't yell, "self defense" after you initiate a confrontation, that's like yelling foul after you start a fight and lose.

Later, physical evidence documented by police surveillance cameras DOES NOT SUPPORT OR CORROBORATE the tale Zimmerman's lawyer relates that Martin bloodied his nose and bashed his skull on the ground via attacking him.

The chief of detectives didn't buy Zimmerman's story based on the evidence, but was prevented from arresting him via interference by the chief of police and the State attorney, BOTH of whom suddenly recuse themselves from the case.

Naa-unnh bunky, all this hoop-la for what looks like manslaughter stinks...and what's at stake is what appears to be a petty, local cover-up that's inadvertently tied to the "Stand Your Ground" law.

I wonder if Trayvon had killed Zimmerman would dopes like YOU be railing for his defense? Anyway, do continue to blow neocon/teabagger smoke on this one.

All that (attack the questioner), and yet you didn't manage to answer one question, let alone all of them.

Calls for public lynching? You have not waited for the evidence. You have tried and convicted a man on what the press has now admitted was doctored, censored and misleading to stir up people. Yes, what we have on display here folks is a person that is not concerned about lynchings, but only that he is on the "right" side of the rope.

 

[paulitician]

Marc in his Hoody.

 

[goodshooting]

Notice folks, that when this neocon/teabagger gasbag was presented with DOCUMENTED FACTS that DISPROVED his assertion, he doesn't have the intellectual honesty or courage to acknowledge such. Instead, we're barraged with a multitude of suppostion and conjecture that wholly ignores the true FACTS of the case at hand, and instead just regurgitates ALREADY DISPROVEN assertions regarding the Zimmerman/Martin case.

FACT: audio documentation clearly has Zimmerman stating that Martin is RUNNING AWAY from him (after initially inspecting the car to see who was following him), and when the dispatch asks if Zimmerman is following, he replies "yes". The dispatch, after PREVIOUSLY confirming that the police are on their way, says "we don't need you to do that", to which Zimmerman confirms "okay".

I love how every liberal takes the dispatch "we do not need you to do that" and changes it into you have to stop following him.

Police dispatch will say "we do not need you to do that" on every aspect that is going above and beyond the call of duty for an American citizen.

They would say the same thing if it would of been someone calling and saying a guy is shooting people want me to try and stop them "we do not need you to do that".

This is a response that is given to alleviate the consequences against the police if something should happen to the caller or the person they are talking to.

Example if George Zimmerman had been told to follow a drug dealer and that said drug dealer turned around and killed George then the family of George would of been able to press back against the police station for saying why did you tell a citizen to put them self in harms way. This then would lead into lawsuit against the police station for pushing a citizen to do something they normally would not have done.

Hopefully this is basic enough for a liberal mind to understand.

Yet, Zimmerman DID CONTINUE TO PURSUE Martin, who's only "crime" was being black, wearing a hoodie IN THE RAIN, and coming under Zimmerman's warped consideration. You don't yell, "self defense" after you initiate a confrontation, that's like yelling foul after you start a fight and lose.

I like how it is always the liberal who takes things to the extreme just so they can yell RACIST.

Zimmerman pursued a suspicious looking person. Those come in all colors not just black. Just and FYI for you because I think you believe that they only are black.

The "Stand Your Ground" law is very simple. You cannot start a fight then mid fight claim "Stand Your Ground". You can be put in a situation where you see things are going bad and state you want no part of this and retreat. At this point if attacked you are no longer an instigator of the fight you are the DEFENDER and "Stand Your Ground" can be played again. This is also where it gets very grey due to when you remove yourself from the conflict.

In Zimmerman's case he was a defender never the aggressor. Zimmerman was monitoring a situation when the person being monitored turned to an aggressor against Zimmerman. Anyone ever seen the videos of people being beaten by police officers for nothing more then video taping them. We do not call those people video taping the Aggressor do we. No they are the monitors. They are there doing nothing more then gathering information.

Now I am sure you do not like to hear any of this because so far it takes all the RACIST bullshit the liberal media has been playing right back against them.

Later, physical evidence documented by police surveillance cameras DOES NOT SUPPORT OR CORROBORATE the tale Zimmerman's lawyer relates that Martin bloodied his nose and bashed his skull on the ground via attacking him.

Oh I love how you bring up the liberal media doctored videos. It is amazing when the actual leaked police video made it to Fox News hands they pointed out the broken nose and the bruising on the back of the head of Zimmerman.

Lets not forget to mention the liberal media only shows pictures of Martin when he was 12 years old. Who gives a shit that he is not really 5'5 120lb but actual 6'3 closer to 200lbs and a full fledged athlete on the football team. Brings a different picture when you actual show the actions and person the deceased was before this shooting. Gold Teeth and twitter name of "No Limit Nigga". Maybe that should be the caption below and actual up to date photo of Martin.

The chief of detectives didn't buy Zimmerman's story based on the evidence, but was prevented from arresting him via interference by the chief of police and the State attorney, BOTH of whom suddenly recuse themselves from the case.

Keep trying to call this a cover up. It never was it is how the law is written is why Zimmerman was not arrested. "Stand Your Ground" makes you immune to criminal and civil prosecution. Meaning that if they believed he was defending himself then they have no ability to arrest him. Remember you are innocent until proven guilty in this country not the other way around.

If you notice he was put in handcuffs and taken to the police station. Which is normal even when under the "Stand Your Ground" but when the facts come out that you defended yourself from and unjustified attack you are let free. This is what they call a "good shooting" in the fact that the defender lived not that anyone has to die. This all goes back to the concealed weapon permit Zimmerman had. If Zimmerman would not have acted to DEFEND himself he could have died. When this level of violence is brought upon you then you can DEFEND yourself with deadly force, and in this situation it was a gun and it ended Martins life.

Is any killing even in self defense a good thing in life, no. Is it good that a innocent man like Zimmerman did not have to sacrifice his life due to the actions of another, YES.

Naa-unnh bunky, all this hoop-la for what looks like manslaughter stinks...and what's at stake is what appears to be a petty, local cover-up that's inadvertently tied to the "Stand Your Ground" law.

I wonder if Trayvon had killed Zimmerman would dopes like YOU be railing for his defense? Anyway, do continue to blow neocon/teabagger smoke on this one.

Now you are using what ifs to try and save a pathetic excuse of more racist bullshit. No reason to even give you an answer for this.

 

[paulitician]

"It's fuckin cold." FUCK YOU GE/NBC! And fuck all shameful Democrat Race-Baiters.

 

[LockeJaw]

It's the biggest, hottest news story in media.

Are they not a media company interesting in keeping the populate updated on the latest and greatest and hottest news?

Any of you wager to guess why such little coverage for the biggest, most powerful media organization on the world?

Because they're RACIST! Right?

 

[paulitician]

It's the biggest, hottest news story in media.

Are they not a media company interesting in keeping the populate updated on the latest and greatest and hottest news?

Any of you wager to guess why such little coverage for the biggest, most powerful media organization on the world?

Because they're RACIST! Right?

Marc in his new Hoody.

 

[LockeJaw]

It's the biggest, hottest news story in media.

Are they not a media company interesting in keeping the populate updated on the latest and greatest and hottest news?

Any of you wager to guess why such little coverage for the biggest, most powerful media organization on the world?

Because they're RACIST! Right?

Marc in his new Hoody.

Everything has to be about race, we just have to accept it.
I think FOX not getting into the sensational tabloid like garbage in their strictly news programming is responsible reporting and the other Alphabet networks should pay attention to that. Because that's why they are on top and these other networks are becoming less and less trusted. Marc should think about that.

 

[LockeJaw]

This brother has caught on to the media's BS.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoiMmY0bhWE&feature=youtube_gdata_player]Trayvon Martin's Fan Club and Media are a joke - YouTube[/ame]

This man spoke my mind. I starting typing out almost the exact same thing yesterday. 100% agreement, brother.

 

[PredFan]

Because they're RACIST! Right?

Marc in his new Hoody.

Everything has to be about race, we just have to accept it.
I think FOX not getting into the sensational tabloid like garbage in their strictly news programming is responsible reporting and the other Alphabet networks should pay attention to that. Because that's why they are on top and these other networks are becoming less and less trusted. Marc should think about that.

Exactly. More and more FOX is becoming the only news network with any credibility.

 

[California Girl]

This brother has caught on to the media's BS.
Trayvon Martin's Fan Club and Media are a joke - YouTube

This man spoke my mind. I starting typing out almost the exact same thing yesterday. 100% agreement, brother.

Can I get an Amen!

That is one smart guy.... whatever his skin color just happens to be. I'm particularly keen on his solution to the fucking asshole racists from both sides. I'd pay to see that!

 

[Katzndogz]

The democrat goal of ginning up Trayvon Martin was so that obama's disasters would be driven off the front page.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

This brother has caught on to the media's BS.
Trayvon Martin's Fan Club and Media are a joke - YouTube

This man spoke my mind. I starting typing out almost the exact same thing yesterday. 100% agreement, brother.

Nicely put.
Here's another
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q67qsUizVPk]Trayvon Martin & George Zimmerman : Un Biased Opinions - YouTube[/ame]