Why is CNN ignoring one fact of the white settlement church shooting?

[pknopp]

Why do you ask an ignorant question when I said what CNN ignored.

Because you're a moron who doesn't acknowledge that CNN and MSNBC and all networks have widely reported that fact.

the moron is you for believing everything fake news says

Dude. The story was fully told. No facts have been left out of CNN's coverage. You must get tired of being a fucking victim all the time. Trombies are so unhappy.

go back and read how CNN reported this they left out that he was a volunteer A GOOD GUY WITH A GUN

Nonsense.

‘Good guy with a gun’ is a myth.

There is no objective, documented evidence in support of the notion that armed citizens in any manner decrease or prevent crime.

It did in this instance.

 

[miketx]

CNN has yet to acknowledge the fact that Jack Wilson is a civilian with a carry conceal permit? He's not a paid security guard he's part of the church security team
Wilson, who is head of security at the church, posted a statement online thanking "all who have sent their prayers and comments on the events of today.
"The events at West Freeway Church of Christ put me in a position that I would hope no one would have to be in, but evil exists and I had to take out an active shooter in church," he said. "I am very sad in the loss of two dear friends and brothers in CHRIST, but evil does exist in this world and I and other members are not going to allow evil to succeed."
Texas pastor says he knew and helped the gunman before the shooting - CNN
Whereas FOX news reports him as a VOLUNTEER of the church security team?
The shooting on Sunday lasted only seconds before Jack Wilson, the head of the church's volunteer security team and a firearms instructor, fatally shot Kinnunen. A livestream of the church service showed the gunman getting up from a pew and talking to someone at the back of the church before pulling out a gun and opening fire.

What one fact are they ignoring??

It's right there in the OP skank.

 

[skookerasbil]

Why do you ask an ignorant question when I said what CNN ignored.

Because you're a moron who doesn't acknowledge that CNN and MSNBC and all networks have widely reported that fact.

the moron is you for believing everything fake news says

Dude. The story was fully told. No facts have been left out of CNN's coverage. You must get tired of being a fucking victim all the time. Trombies are so unhappy.

go back and read how CNN reported this they left out that he was a volunteer A GOOD GUY WITH A GUN

Nonsense.

‘Good guy with a gun’ is a myth.

There is no objective, documented evidence in support of the notion that armed citizens in any manner decrease or prevent crime.

Thank God most people dont concur. It's the only thing that matters. Gun grabbing is ghey......so says the public.. In this country anyway....and in European countries that have banned guns, the murder rate has climbed 9X.....so says Harvard University in 2013 in the Journal of Law and Public Policy.

 

[2aguy]

Why do you ask an ignorant question when I said what CNN ignored.

Because you're a moron who doesn't acknowledge that CNN and MSNBC and all networks have widely reported that fact.

the moron is you for believing everything fake news says

Dude. The story was fully told. No facts have been left out of CNN's coverage. You must get tired of being a fucking victim all the time. Trombies are so unhappy.

go back and read how CNN reported this they left out that he was a volunteer A GOOD GUY WITH A GUN

Nonsense.

‘Good guy with a gun’ is a myth.

There is no objective, documented evidence in support of the notion that armed citizens in any manner decrease or prevent crime.

You know what you posted is a lie....and yet you still post it.....

This link, which you have been shown over and over....used to say they looked at 33 shootings.......this would now be 34 with the Texas church shooting.......

Armed Citizens Are Successful 94% Of The Time At Active Shooter Events [FBI]

Of all the active shooter events there were 33 at which an armed citizen was present. Of those, Armed Citizens were successful at stopping the Active shooter 75.8% of the time (25 incidents) and were successful in reducing the loss of life in an additional 18.2% (6) of incidents. In only 2 of the 33 incidents (6.1%) was the Armed Citizen(s) not helpful in any way in stopping the active shooter or reducing the loss of life.

Thus the headline of our report that Armed Citizens Are Successful 94% Of The Time At Active Shooter Events.


In the 2 incidents at which the armed citizen “failed” to stop or slow the active shooter, one is the previously mentioned incident with hunters. The other is an incident in which the CCWer was shot in the back in a Las Vegas Walmart when he failed to identify that there were 2 Active Shooters involved in the attack. He neglected to identify the one that shot him in the back while he was trying to ambush the other perpetrator.

We also decided to look at the breakdown of events that took place in gun free zones and the relative death toll from events in gun free zones vs non-gun-free zones.

Of the 283 incidents in our data pool, we were unable to identify if the event took place in a gun-free zone in a large number (41%) of the events. Most of the events took place at a business, church, home, or other places at which as a rule of law it is not a gun free zone but potentially could have been declared one by the property owner. Without any information in the FBI study or any indication one way or the other from the news reports, we have indicated that event with a question mark.

If you look at all of the Active Shooter events (pie chart on the top) you see that for those which we have the information, almost twice as many took place in gun free zones than not; but realistically the vast majority of those for which we have no information (indicated as ?) are probably NOT gun free zones.

If you isolate just the events at which 8 or more people were killed the data paints a different picture (pie chart on the bottom). In these incidents, 77.8% took place in a gun-free zone suggesting that gun free zones lead to a higher death rate vs active shooter events in general

=====

One of the final metrics we thought was important to consider is the potential tendency for armed citizens to injure or kill innocent people in their attempt to “save the day.” A common point in political discussions is to point out the lack of training of most armed citizens and the decrease in safety inherent in their presence during violent encounters.

As you can see below, however, at the 33 incidents at which Armed Citizens were present, there were zero situations at which the Armed Citizen injured or killed an innocent person. It never happened.

BREAKING: Man Opens Fire At Oklahoma Walmart, Confronted By Armed Citizen, Report Says

Two people were killed at a Walmart in Oklahoma by a man who opened fire in the parking lot on Monday before turning the weapon on himself after an armed citizen confronted him.
------

The assailant, who has not yet been identified, shot and killed a man and a woman in the parking lot and when he was “confronted by an armed citizen, he then turned the gun on himself,” The Daily Mail reported.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why do you ask an ignorant question when I said what CNN ignored.

Because you're a moron who doesn't acknowledge that CNN and MSNBC and all networks have widely reported that fact.

the moron is you for believing everything fake news says

Dude. The story was fully told. No facts have been left out of CNN's coverage. You must get tired of being a fucking victim all the time. Trombies are so unhappy.

go back and read how CNN reported this they left out that he was a volunteer A GOOD GUY WITH A GUN

Nonsense.

‘Good guy with a gun’ is a myth.

There is no objective, documented evidence in support of the notion that armed citizens in any manner decrease or prevent crime.

You're retarded and that's not a myth