The Clintons are criminals. They should be in prison. But hey, you wanna desperately justify supporting criminals, so be it i guess. That's on you.
Nice deflection, so I'll ask again.
Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Donald Trump Is Beloved?
Well, Cosby turned off both parties
- He turned off Democrats by daring to say blacks should take care of themselves (ala Malcolm X) and stop relying on government
- Yet he remained a solid Democrat
So who's going to support him?
WTF does that have to do with anything?
Read your question, I answered it. How dumb are you?
No, you're the idiot. Who gives a shit what Cosby's political leanings are, we all know he's guilty.
Right, you're voting for the one who attacks the victims of sexual predators a second time, she doesn't commit the first assault so it's OK.
It's pathetic that liberal women vote for someone enabling a sexual predator because she's the one promising you the most free government cheese. You're a Democrat before you're a woman
Most women get angry at the other woman who's been cheating with her husband. I don't fault Hillary because Bill cheated.
If Hillary is an enabler, who is enabling Donald?
We aren't talking cheating...we are talking rape and sexual assault that hilary used private detectives and political operatives to cover up.....she is an accomplice after the fact and she obstructed justice in rape and sexual assault....
What is it with you twits....?
Go put your tin foil hat on. Broaddrick signed an affidavit stating her claims were bogus.
And here is the truth...
Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?
She Changed Her Story:
In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did notassault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she wasraped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.
Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.
Clinton Is Guilty:
Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity.
That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators.
(At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.
She Told Friends:
Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.
-----------------------------
Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.
This is a from a 1999 LA Times article.
But, if Broaddrick's story sounds familiar, it also sounds fishy--and raises too many questions for me to believe her.
* Broaddrick says she can remember every detail of the rape, except the month and day it occurred. If it scarred her for life, wouldn't she remember the date? Or at least the month?
* Broaddrick says she told her husband, David, what happened. But, at the time, David was not her husband. He was her boyfriend, with whom she was cheating on her first husband. Question: What if Clinton and Broaddrick had consensual sex? If you're cheating on your husband, and then cheat on your boyfriend, do you tell your boyfriend the truth?
* Within one year of the alleged rape, Broaddrick attended a fund-raiser for Clinton and accepted appointment by him to a state advisory board. Why did she still want to support a man who raped her?
* Broaddrick claims Clinton kissed her so hard he left her lip visibly black and blue, and she covered up by telling people she'd had an accident. But her first husband, Gary Hickey, says he remembers no such injury when she returned from Little Rock, nor such a story.
* One year later, Broaddrick filed divorce papers against Hickey, claiming he struck her on the mouth. Was that the only time?
* Broaddrick also told two girlfriends, who are sisters, what happened, which both confirm. But both admit they hate Clinton because he commuted the death sentence of the man who murdered their father. Can they be trusted?
* In 1997, Broaddrick signed an affidavit and gave a deposition in the Jones case, denying twice under oath that Clinton raped her. "These allegations are untrue and there is no truth to these rumors." If Clinton did rape her, 20 years later, why would she still not tell the truth?
* Last year, Broaddrick told independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr that her Jones testimony was false, but that she had been under absolutely no pressure from the president or the White House to file a false affidavit. So, did she lie to the Jones team? Or did she lie to Starr? Or is she now lying to NBC? How do we know?
The truth is, we don't know. And we'll never know. But we do know this. We know that Starr's investigators talked to Broaddrick and listened to her story--and decided not to pursue it. That, in itself, casts huge doubts on Broaddrick's credibility. If Starr would impeach Clinton for oral sex, he would certainly indict or impeach him for rape, if he could prove it. Which nobody can.
Yes, it's disturbing to hear the president of the United States accused of rape. But it's even more disturbing to see an innocent man condemned, without the evidence. In this case, the evidence against Clinton is simply not there.
Clinton Rape Charge Can't Be Proved
