Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?
Bill Clinton is not loved by me, nor are those who ascertained those who impeached him would suffer politically. Of all of those who impeached him, the Democrats destroyed all their re-election campaigns and insured they would never be re-elected.

Just shoot me, but philanderers are not noticed for even a modicum of trust by people who know better than to vote for one. <giggle>
Says the republican with a host of Draconian bigots looking over his shoulder adorned with rebel flags, KKK insignia patches and the GOP logo displayed unabashedly..metaphorically speaking of course.
 
PC/Identity Politics have always been a one-way street only, of course.

Adding a little gas to the flame for the Left is the fact that Cosby made those comments several years ago challenging blacks to "pull up their pants" and start taking more responsibility for their lives. The PC Police couldn't have that, so he has been persona non grata with them since that time.

It really is looking like Cosby is a world-class creep and maybe a sick bastard on top of it. But all this stuff remains a one-way street only.
.

You're an idiot. What one-way street? Bill Clinton has been attacked constantly for 2 decades now, at least.
 
Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

NO, actually, it's about policy. Regardless of what the bribed bimbos have said about Clinton-42. (Get used to calling him that, because Clinton-45 is coming!) Clinton was on the right side of subjects the 99.999% of women who didn't have sex with him cared about- Reproductive rights, equal pay, family and medical leave.

Meanwhile, Bill Cosby was busy calling single mothers nasty names when he wasn't drugging women to rape them.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

The only reason why Right Wingers care about "Muslim Women" is because they are standing on top of a shitload of oil. If you believe otherwise, you are ******* delusional. And they will send young working class men and women off to die for that oil. Except people are calling bullshit on that one now.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal.

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Or that we found that most of these women were liars.
Slick willy was and is still a child molester/rapist
Liar. Dirtbag variety of Liar. Show a link where Clinton has been accused of being a child molester.
 
Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

Mr. Clinton never tried to direct us to buy pudding products...
 
PC/Identity Politics have always been a one-way street only, of course.

Adding a little gas to the flame for the Left is the fact that Cosby made those comments several years ago challenging blacks to "pull up their pants" and start taking more responsibility for their lives. The PC Police couldn't have that, so he has been persona non grata with them since that time.

It really is looking like Cosby is a world-class creep and maybe a sick bastard on top of it. But all this stuff remains a one-way street only.
.

You're an idiot. What one-way street? Bill Clinton has been attacked constantly for 2 decades now, at least.
... he snarls, completely missing the point.

:laugh:
.
 
PC/Identity Politics have always been a one-way street only, of course.

Adding a little gas to the flame for the Left is the fact that Cosby made those comments several years ago challenging blacks to "pull up their pants" and start taking more responsibility for their lives. The PC Police couldn't have that, so he has been persona non grata with them since that time.

It really is looking like Cosby is a world-class creep and maybe a sick bastard on top of it. But all this stuff remains a one-way street only.
.

You're an idiot. What one-way street? Bill Clinton has been attacked constantly for 2 decades now, at least.


and he earned every attack, just as bush did, and carter, and Reagan, and kennedy ,and Lincoln, and Washington, et al.


there is nothing new or unique here.
attacking politicians is how our political process works, like it or not
 
Only one woman accused Clinton of rape and she waited more than 20 years to make the accusation, conveniently, it was when news media were chasing those stories and paying big bucks for interviews and stories. Shows were giving free first class expense paid trips to places like NYC and LA to appear for those interviews
And that woman (who was cheating on her husband) changed her story, couldn't remember the date the supposed incident happened -- or even the month...

Before Clinton was elected president, there were a slew of reporters and Clinton haters who dug deep into it, and found the story not passing the sniff test.

It didn't help her case when it was learned she attended a fundraising event for Bill a month after that supposed incident.


Ok all of the Clinton accusers were liars and sluts. all of the cosby accusers are fine upstanding women. you people are nuts.
I haven't said a word about Cosby, but I do know, as do most people with half a brain, the two are not comparable in any way.

There was one woman who has come forth and alleged Bill raped her.

That same woman signed an affidavit, under oath, saying she was *not* raped or sexually accosted by Clinton.


OK, great. Bubba Clinton never did anything wrong to any woman, he is a prince, your hero, best redneck ever out of Arkansas. Hillary is the perfect woman, beautiful, talented, honest, and trustworthy.

as I said, you people are nuts.
The Clintons are a pair of snake oil salesmen. Wouldn't trust either of them as far as I could throw 'em. They are amoral and too damned rich and powerful to feel the rules really apply to them. But Bill isn't a rapist. There's a difference.


and you know he isn't a rapist, how?
 
ef3a746884a02a30cbf5aff1102a18698e8cd2ab6b0a0987b8e1ca6a3a1d760b_1.jpg
 
And that woman (who was cheating on her husband) changed her story, couldn't remember the date the supposed incident happened -- or even the month...

Before Clinton was elected president, there were a slew of reporters and Clinton haters who dug deep into it, and found the story not passing the sniff test.

It didn't help her case when it was learned she attended a fundraising event for Bill a month after that supposed incident.


Ok all of the Clinton accusers were liars and sluts. all of the cosby accusers are fine upstanding women. you people are nuts.
I haven't said a word about Cosby, but I do know, as do most people with half a brain, the two are not comparable in any way.

There was one woman who has come forth and alleged Bill raped her.

That same woman signed an affidavit, under oath, saying she was *not* raped or sexually accosted by Clinton.


OK, great. Bubba Clinton never did anything wrong to any woman, he is a prince, your hero, best redneck ever out of Arkansas. Hillary is the perfect woman, beautiful, talented, honest, and trustworthy.

as I said, you people are nuts.
The Clintons are a pair of snake oil salesmen. Wouldn't trust either of them as far as I could throw 'em. They are amoral and too damned rich and powerful to feel the rules really apply to them. But Bill isn't a rapist. There's a difference.


and you know he isn't a rapist, how?
Do you know the difference between fact and opinion? If you make the statement that in your opinion Clinton is a rapist that would be a subjective opinion. When you present the same comment without the caveat that it is an opinion, you are attempting to present it as an objective fact and that is what makes it a lie. The attempt to portray an opinion as a fact is when a lie is created.
 
Stephanie wroted: Clinton wasn't successful.

Uncle Ferd says, "Well...

... he was successful at gettin' womens...

... like Miss Monica an' Miss Paula...

... dat's successful `nuff fer Uncle Ferd."
What the Clinton haters have never understood is that at the time this was in the news and taking place, a large percentage of men asked themselves whether they would have denied a groupies sexual favors if they were powerful, rich or a celebrity worthy of having females chasing after them.


We aren't talking groupies....we are talking actual rape and sexual assault throughout his life......even when he was in the United Kingdom.......as a sexual predator he targeted women he could control and had deniability with...students, staff, and he used his power in office as a Teacher, as the Attorney General of Arkansas, as the Governor of Arkansas, and finally as President to silence these women...and the person in charge of those efforts was hilary clinton, who used the power of his offices and their own resources to hire private detectives to attack these women and silence them.......

I know...you left wing twits are going to hide behind paula jones.....but we have at least 14 women that we know of who have accused him of rape and sexual assault...on top of his affairs......the rape and sexual assault are crimes.....and you can't acknowledge them......or hilary is sunk...
 
Yeah, because "you ought to put some ice on that," is sooooooooooooo much better.

The War on Women: Juanita Broaddrick and Bill Clinton - Breitbart
No it's that drugging women is so much worse than that

Biting a woman's lip through to force her to be raped is better??????????????

Is that your position?
I'm not defending clinton but
I don't assume a woman that cries rape is automatically telling the truth

No charges were ever filed that's all I know

As with Cosby and others, Clinton had several women come forward and that is what disturbing. One, two maybe...but when it gets more than that...where there is smoke, there is fire. I don't think they all lied. They just didn't have proof and as with any rape, it is one word against another.
heres where you have a problem bill cosby is being accused of rape ... bill clinton was accused of having and affairs and sexual harassment by paula jones he was never charged with a rape of any kind do some damn research for once in your life


bill Cosby had never been officially accused of rape either...until he was arrested......

clintion has been accused of rape at least 3 times that we know of and sexual assault of one degree or another over 10 times, that we know of........imagine how many women are too afraid to come forward....because he was the Attorney General, the Governor and now the President....

And even when he was teaching his law class he assaulted female students and used his position to lie about them.....

You guys.......this is getting more and more attention...you can lie all you want....he is a rapist and a serial sexual predator.
 
If they can bring up charges from something that happened years ago. People shouldn't be cheering something like this. it could be YOU NEXT THEY DO it do.

and you're right. why isn't Billy Hounddog Clinton being brought up on the charges that were brought against him by a bunch of women?

Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing Clinton's underwear. And all he could come up with that he could prove is that Clinton got oral gratification from a woman who wanted to do so.

......you left out the obstruction of justice charge which is what he went after. The oral gratification was just a side show. The sad thing is that Clinton was so popular and approved, the majority would not have given two shits if he got some action after hours. By his own words, it was the cover-up that pissed off America. You Clinton lapdogs just like to hide behind the stained blue dress because you can't defend the obstruction of justice charge.
Many, like myself, did not give a crap if Bill was a woman chaser getting action on the side. He wasn't elected as Reverend or Pastor, he was elected as President. When he got caught and tried to weasel out of responsibility it was understandable. His accusers were gold diggers who put greed over harming the elected President. They all knew, every one of them, that they were dealing with a married family man. What did Paula Jones think when she went to Clinton's hotel room by herself?

Huma.........wow...who would have thought you would have time to post here...shouldn't you be guarding your own sexual predator husband.....not running interference on U.S. for hilary and her rapist husband?
 
No it's that drugging women is so much worse than that

Biting a woman's lip through to force her to be raped is better??????????????

Is that your position?
I'm not defending clinton but
I don't assume a woman that cries rape is automatically telling the truth

No charges were ever filed that's all I know

As with Cosby and others, Clinton had several women come forward and that is what disturbing. One, two maybe...but when it gets more than that...where there is smoke, there is fire. I don't think they all lied. They just didn't have proof and as with any rape, it is one word against another.
heres where you have a problem bill cosby is being accused of rape ... bill clinton was accused of having and affairs and sexual harassment by paula jones he was never charged with a rape of any kind do some damn research for once in your life


bill Cosby had never been officially accused of rape either...until he was arrested......

clintion has been accused of rape at least 3 times that we know of and sexual assault of one degree or another over 10 times, that we know of........imagine how many women are too afraid to come forward....because he was the Attorney General, the Governor and now the President....

And even when he was teaching his law class he assaulted female students and used his position to lie about them.....

You guys.......this is getting more and more attention...you can lie all you want....he is a rapist and a serial sexual predator.

Did Clinton drug victims?


No, he physically assaulted them.....one thing he did was bite their lips to control them as he raped them.

It's Twilight Zone time!
 
How did Bubba Bill beat the rap based on the statute of limitation while Cosby is indicted for alleged sexual assaults that happened more than ten years ago?
I believe sexual statues have been changed on sexual charges
Only one woman accused Clinton of rape and she waited more than 20 years to make the accusation, conveniently, it was when news media were chasing those stories and paying big bucks for interviews and stories. Shows were giving free first class expense paid trips to places like NYC and LA to appear for those interviews


Wrong...at least 2 others......

Bill Clinton s ong history of sexual assault

Washingtonpost.com Special Report Clinton Accused

Clinton s list of ignored accusers - Illinois Review

Here is a post from U.S. message that lists clintons victims...

Eileen Wellstone, a 19-year-old English woman, said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where Clinton was a student in 1969. In fact, Clinton was expelled from Oxford and earned no degree there.

Juanita Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape. Broaddrick gave a stunning interview to NBC’s Lisa Myers about the assault.

Carolyn Moffet, a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met Gov. Clinton at a political fundraiser and was invited to his hotel room. “When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn’t even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room,” she said.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state title. Gracen later told an interviewer that sex with Clinton was consensual. Her roommate Judy Stokes has said the ex-Miss Arkansas told her she was raped after the incident.

Paula Corbin Jones, an Arkansas state worker, filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after an encounter in a Little Rock hotel room where the then-governor exposed himself and demanded oral sex. Clinton settled the case with Jones with an $850,000 payment.

Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, D.C., political fundraiser, said Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a political trip to the nation’s capital in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She fled.

Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton’s leased campaign plane in 1992, says presidential candidate Clinton exposed himself, grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.

Kathleen Willey, a White House volunteer, said that Clinton grabbed her, fondled her breast and pressed her hand against his genitals during an Oval Office meeting in November 1993. Willey became a target for a Hillary directed smear campaign after she went public.


Why Hillary Is Not Inevitable Bill s Sordid Past The Daily Caller
Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth
Bill Clinton has the real rape problem
Bill Clinton s ong history of sexual assault
Hillary s War on Women

Clinton s list of ignored accusers - Illinois Review

  • Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
  • Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
  • Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
  • Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
  • Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
  • Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
  • 22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
  • Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
  • Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
  • Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
  • Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
  • 1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
  • 1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
  • Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
  • Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
  • Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
  • Sally Perdue - post incident threats
  • Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
  • Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
 
15th post
How did Bubba Bill beat the rap based on the statute of limitation while Cosby is indicted for alleged sexual assaults that happened more than ten years ago?
I believe sexual statues have been changed on sexual charges
Only one woman accused Clinton of rape and she waited more than 20 years to make the accusation, conveniently, it was when news media were chasing those stories and paying big bucks for interviews and stories. Shows were giving free first class expense paid trips to places like NYC and LA to appear for those interviews
And that woman (who was cheating on her husband) changed her story, couldn't remember the date the supposed incident happened -- or even the month...

Before Clinton was elected president, there were a slew of reporters and Clinton haters who dug deep into it, and found the story not passing the sniff test.

It didn't help her case when it was learned she attended a fundraising event for Bill a month after that supposed incident.


Ok all of the Clinton accusers were liars and sluts. all of the cosby accusers are fine upstanding women. you people are nuts.
I haven't said a word about Cosby, but I do know, as do most people with half a brain, the two are not comparable in any way.

There was one woman who has come forth and alleged Bill raped her.

That same woman signed an affidavit, under oath, saying she was *not* raped or sexually accosted by Clinton.


Wrong....at least 3....
 
Juanita Broderick accused Clinton of rape,

She never brought charges and she signed a sworn affidavit she was not raped.

Paula Jones accused Clinton of using his office and power to try to have sex with Clinton.
Went to court and had her case thrown out as being "without merit."

Kathleen Willey claims Clinton abused his powers when he groped her.

And Kathleen Willey, that ****ed mess of a woman, said she was groped, only to find out after said groping, she wrote Bill Clinton love letters praising him, asking for jobs, and even asked for a freaking Ambassadorship! [The Willey-Clinton Letters]


Eileen Wellstone, a 19-year-old English woman, said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where Clinton was a student in 1969. In fact, Clinton was expelled from Oxford and earned no degree there.

Juanita Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape. Broaddrick gave a stunning interview to NBC’s Lisa Myers about the assault.


Elizabeth Ward Gracen, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state title. Gracen later told an interviewer that sex with Clinton was consensual. Her roommate Judy Stokes has said the ex-Miss Arkansas told her she was raped after the incident.
 
Juanita Broderick accused Clinton of rape,

She never brought charges and she signed a sworn affidavit she was not raped.

Paula Jones accused Clinton of using his office and power to try to have sex with Clinton.
Went to court and had her case thrown out as being "without merit."

Kathleen Willey claims Clinton abused his powers when he groped her.

And Kathleen Willey, that ****ed mess of a woman, said she was groped, only to find out after said groping, she wrote Bill Clinton love letters praising him, asking for jobs, and even asked for a freaking Ambassadorship! [The Willey-Clinton Letters]


Juanita Broderick....

Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did notassault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she wasraped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.
 
And that woman (who was cheating on her husband) changed her story, couldn't remember the date the supposed incident happened -- or even the month...

Before Clinton was elected president, there were a slew of reporters and Clinton haters who dug deep into it, and found the story not passing the sniff test.

It didn't help her case when it was learned she attended a fundraising event for Bill a month after that supposed incident.


Ok all of the Clinton accusers were liars and sluts. all of the cosby accusers are fine upstanding women. you people are nuts.
I haven't said a word about Cosby, but I do know, as do most people with half a brain, the two are not comparable in any way.

There was one woman who has come forth and alleged Bill raped her.

That same woman signed an affidavit, under oath, saying she was *not* raped or sexually accosted by Clinton.


OK, great. Bubba Clinton never did anything wrong to any woman, he is a prince, your hero, best redneck ever out of Arkansas. Hillary is the perfect woman, beautiful, talented, honest, and trustworthy.

as I said, you people are nuts.
The Clintons are a pair of snake oil salesmen. Wouldn't trust either of them as far as I could throw 'em. They are amoral and too damned rich and powerful to feel the rules really apply to them. But Bill isn't a rapist. There's a difference.


and you know he isn't a rapist, how?

The same way we 'know' you're not a rapist?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom