Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with you I have never like nafta or andy of these deals that they have passed ...there has to be some way we can sell our goods to countries with out any tariff... there has to be some way we stop corporations from going over seas it seems to me nobody has come up with a great ideaHe is pushing for Fair Trade policies and I agree. I oppose you on this one. I also oppose submission to our laws to WTO courts. Again, it's not Free Trade anyway. To the damage.........the TPA fight verifies it will damage us. Because it's very reason for existing is to train displaced workers from modern industrial nations like the United States.There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.So I vote for Trump just hoping with his giving me no reason to believe so that he'll make better Supreme picks than Hillary? I need a little more than that
No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
They know these deals will cost us jobs and that dog doesn't hunt with me. Jeff Sessions is opposing it and he's conservative as hell. He knows it will kill our jobs. He's right and I agree.
I agree with you I have never like nafta or andy of these deals that they have passed ...there has to be some way we can sell our goods to countries with out any tariff... there has to be some way we stop corporations from going over seas it seems to me nobody has come up with a great ideaHe is pushing for Fair Trade policies and I agree. I oppose you on this one. I also oppose submission to our laws to WTO courts. Again, it's not Free Trade anyway. To the damage.........the TPA fight verifies it will damage us. Because it's very reason for existing is to train displaced workers from modern industrial nations like the United States.There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
They know these deals will cost us jobs and that dog doesn't hunt with me. Jeff Sessions is opposing it and he's conservative as hell. He knows it will kill our jobs. He's right and I agree.
I agree with you I have never like nafta or andy of these deals that they have passed ...there has to be some way we can sell our goods to countries with out any tariff... there has to be some way we stop corporations from going over seas it seems to me nobody has come up with a great ideaHe is pushing for Fair Trade policies and I agree. I oppose you on this one. I also oppose submission to our laws to WTO courts. Again, it's not Free Trade anyway. To the damage.........the TPA fight verifies it will damage us. Because it's very reason for existing is to train displaced workers from modern industrial nations like the United States.There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
They know these deals will cost us jobs and that dog doesn't hunt with me. Jeff Sessions is opposing it and he's conservative as hell. He knows it will kill our jobs. He's right and I agree.
Which is the only way Hillary can win. Ross Perot all over again.heres is what I think is going to happen .. trump won't go over the 50% delegates thats required neither will Cruse or rubio ... when that happens according to RNC rules is the delegates no longer have to support the person they voted for ... that they can vote for any of the candidates ... what I believe might happen they will vote for Cruz or rubio leaving Trump pissed as hell, I think they will go more for rubio then cruz many in the RNC said they don't like cruz at all any way this will drive Trump to runs as a third party ... from what you hear from the RNC they're not real happy with trumpWe don't.......but the odds trump will pick hardcore, ideological, anti American justices is smaller than the chances hilary will....you know she will not only have an anti American, anti freedom litmus test for her judges...she will have extensive files on them and she will use them to keep the justices from going rogue, and they will take a blood oath to her before they are appointed........
That I hope Trump won't implement his anti-free market ideology in picking judges as being the one reason I vote for him isn't going to do it
So....knowing for sure that hilary will put anti free market judges on the court is better than voting for Trump who has stated he will pick judges like Scalia and Thomas......? You have a 50/50 chance with Trump to pick a good judge...you have a 100% chance that hilary will pick bad judges.......
Trump tells us he wants to control markets, I say that makes the odds less than 50/50. This is why we need someone like Cruz, not Trump. Not that it's a sure thing, but Cruz at least says he's on the right side
Tariffs were used for over 200 years. Tariffs are still being used under the current Free Trade Agreements. It still isn't Free Trade even under the deals.So I vote for Trump just hoping with his giving me no reason to believe so that he'll make better Supreme picks than Hillary? I need a little more than that
No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
We don't.......but the odds trump will pick hardcore, ideological, anti American justices is smaller than the chances hilary will....you know she will not only have an anti American, anti freedom litmus test for her judges...she will have extensive files on them and she will use them to keep the justices from going rogue, and they will take a blood oath to her before they are appointed........
That I hope Trump won't implement his anti-free market ideology in picking judges as being the one reason I vote for him isn't going to do it
Allowing a foreign WTO court to order the United States to alter it's laws or receive retalitory Tariffs is an abomination of the Constitution. Under the TPP companies will be able to directly sue for damages Countries under the WTO court. That is idiotic.
He is pushing for Fair Trade policies and I agree. I oppose you on this one. I also oppose submission to our laws to WTO courts. Again, it's not Free Trade anyway. To the damage.........the TPA fight verifies it will damage us. Because it's very reason for existing is to train displaced workers from modern industrial nations like the United States.There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.So I vote for Trump just hoping with his giving me no reason to believe so that he'll make better Supreme picks than Hillary? I need a little more than that
No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
They know these deals will cost us jobs and that dog doesn't hunt with me. Jeff Sessions is opposing it and he's conservative as hell. He knows it will kill our jobs. He's right and I agree.
There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.So I vote for Trump just hoping with his giving me no reason to believe so that he'll make better Supreme picks than Hillary? I need a little more than that
No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
Do you think hilary believes in free markets......?
I agree with you I have never like nafta or andy of these deals that they have passed ...there has to be some way we can sell our goods to countries with out any tariff... there has to be some way we stop corporations from going over seas it seems to me nobody has come up with a great ideaHe is pushing for Fair Trade policies and I agree. I oppose you on this one. I also oppose submission to our laws to WTO courts. Again, it's not Free Trade anyway. To the damage.........the TPA fight verifies it will damage us. Because it's very reason for existing is to train displaced workers from modern industrial nations like the United States.There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
They know these deals will cost us jobs and that dog doesn't hunt with me. Jeff Sessions is opposing it and he's conservative as hell. He knows it will kill our jobs. He's right and I agree.
taxes on corporations ok, but regulations I would question the regulation that they want removed ... regulations on pollution, air water, and ground .. that i would like to see tuffer ... if lowering taxes would put a factory here permanent I'm for that ... having their head quarters here and using off shore banks, I'm against .. i'm against any tax right offs ... for any company ... if they're getting lower taxes then they have to pay their fare share ... its not a case they pay nothing ... if a company decides to move over seas after they get all these breaks then they will have huge tariffs on their product ... thats wishful thinking on my partI agree with you I have never like nafta or andy of these deals that they have passed ...there has to be some way we can sell our goods to countries with out any tariff... there has to be some way we stop corporations from going over seas it seems to me nobody has come up with a great ideaHe is pushing for Fair Trade policies and I agree. I oppose you on this one. I also oppose submission to our laws to WTO courts. Again, it's not Free Trade anyway. To the damage.........the TPA fight verifies it will damage us. Because it's very reason for existing is to train displaced workers from modern industrial nations like the United States.There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
They know these deals will cost us jobs and that dog doesn't hunt with me. Jeff Sessions is opposing it and he's conservative as hell. He knows it will kill our jobs. He's right and I agree.
Lowering taxes and cutting stupid regulations would be a big help.
There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.No....you don't really.......30 years of Supreme Court decisions.....Private Property Rights, Tax law....obamacare rulings....2nd Amendment rulings.......the justices hilary will pick will be hard core leftists......they will not hesitate to make law from the Bench, they will make decisions striking down individual rights for the next 30 years.
The Check on her power that may come from the Republicans holding one or both houses of congress will mean nothing compared to the almost eternal rulings made by that court. Remember....any conservative justices appointed afterward will adhere to the concept of "Precedent" and will not seek to overturn previous rulings....
The threat to the country of 3 Court Justices picked by hilary is just not negotiable...........
You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
Do you think hilary believes in free markets......?
Of course not. I have no idea why you're asking me that given anything I've said
There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
Do you think hilary believes in free markets......?
Of course not. I have no idea why you're asking me that given anything I've said
Because you have 2 candidates....one a business man who says some things about trade that may or may not be true....he is a negotiator and his current statements on trade may just be opening negotiating points for the future....
then you have a hard core anti-business hilary...
so they may be the same on free trade..or not....
If they are the same on free trade they cancel out that issue.
that leaves trump 50/50 on judges....hilary 100% on bad judges....
That still leaves trump ahead of hilary.......
There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
Do you think hilary believes in free markets......?
Of course not. I have no idea why you're asking me that given anything I've said
Because you have 2 candidates....one a business man who says some things about trade that may or may not be true....he is a negotiator and his current statements on trade may just be opening negotiating points for the future....
then you have a hard core anti-business hilary...
so they may be the same on free trade..or not....
If they are the same on free trade they cancel out that issue.
that leaves trump 50/50 on judges....hilary 100% on bad judges....
That still leaves trump ahead of hilary.......
As I keep pointing out, giving Trump credit for being 50/50 on judges when his stated ideology is on the Hillary side of a lack of free trade is giving him too much credit.
You want a half court shot or no shot? Half court, but that isn't offering me enough to actually vote for someone who says they disagree with me
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
Do you think hilary believes in free markets......?
Of course not. I have no idea why you're asking me that given anything I've said
Because you have 2 candidates....one a business man who says some things about trade that may or may not be true....he is a negotiator and his current statements on trade may just be opening negotiating points for the future....
then you have a hard core anti-business hilary...
so they may be the same on free trade..or not....
If they are the same on free trade they cancel out that issue.
that leaves trump 50/50 on judges....hilary 100% on bad judges....
That still leaves trump ahead of hilary.......
As I keep pointing out, giving Trump credit for being 50/50 on judges when his stated ideology is on the Hillary side of a lack of free trade is giving him too much credit.
You want a half court shot or no shot? Half court, but that isn't offering me enough to actually vote for someone who says they disagree with me
except the other person is 100% guaranteed to give you 30 years of anti freedom rulings.......
For me....it is voting for the lesser of two evils...other wise the greater of two evils may win.
I am a Cruz supporter...but I will vote for a rock if it means hilary won't become President...she already has business deals with foreign countries lined up through her foundation.......on top of the bad judges....
Tariffs and quota's have always been a consumption tax. The duties and fees to do trade in countries have NEVER been free..........They still exist even though we call it Free Trade.I agree with you I have never like nafta or andy of these deals that they have passed ...there has to be some way we can sell our goods to countries with out any tariff... there has to be some way we stop corporations from going over seas it seems to me nobody has come up with a great ideaHe is pushing for Fair Trade policies and I agree. I oppose you on this one. I also oppose submission to our laws to WTO courts. Again, it's not Free Trade anyway. To the damage.........the TPA fight verifies it will damage us. Because it's very reason for existing is to train displaced workers from modern industrial nations like the United States.There is no doubt via Hillary. A common sense approach would be we'd be better off with someone else deciding instead of her.You're making the faulty conclusion that I have any reason to believe Trump will pick better justices than Hillary will
I've repeatedly said I'd probably vote for Cruz or Rubio and likely Kasich, But Trump says he doesn't believe in free markets, that's a different thing
They know these deals will cost us jobs and that dog doesn't hunt with me. Jeff Sessions is opposing it and he's conservative as hell. He knows it will kill our jobs. He's right and I agree.
You see Eagle, this idea "fair trade" will lead to "free trade" is nonsense. Politicians use the power of guns to limit our freedom to only help themselves
My vote has to be EARNED.Staying at home is the same as voting for Hillary.................
When you vote for someone, you are telling them they are doing something right. So fuck you if you think I should vote for Trump if he is the GOP nominee just to stop Clinton. He has not earned my vote. He is not doing anything right.
If you want to be a cheap whore, go right ahead. Just don't expect me to lay down next to you and spread for Trump.
If Trump is the Republican nominee, the dipshits DESERVE Clinton as their President. They will have no one to blame but themselves, not me.
Shipping our jobs overseas is not in the best interest of this country
Then the countries we do business with can up their standards to ours and then and only then get it free.Shipping our jobs overseas is not in the best interest of this country
Of course it is, when it's done by a private company with a free choice. That means it was economically more efficient. Which benefits our economy as a whole. And I continue to find it stunning how many conservatives believe it's a legitimate function of government to use force to make our choices for us. If I want to move the operations of my company offshore, it's none of your business to stop me. Set up your own company and keep your operations here.
I don't get what the rest of it has to do with what I'm arguing. I never said trade is totally free. But I want people who move us in the right direction, not the wrong one as Trump says he wants to do and make it less free
Losing jobs and lowering our workers wages doesn't help America
We could continue our fight with opposing tax strategies again. You want some more of that............Maybe a VAT>
I'm a free market capitalist. Right there, Trump is a non-starter
I'm a free market capitalist. Right there, Trump is a non-starter
I will end up voting for him if he ends up the nominee. I still cannot believe how fellow conservatives on this forum are acting though.
I thought cults of personality and vacuous devotion to messianic bullshit artists was limited to bed wetting libturds.
That is clearly not the case. Ted Cruz has stood by his principles and has been unwavering, even while being excoriated by both sides. I have seen people I once had respect for vilify him and assert that he is on the side of Bill Ayers, Soros and the Bushes.
Trump has tapped danced on both sides of every issue. HE IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE!!! I will vote for him if he ends up winning, but I will have to get drunk and have a nice steak because I have to be wined and dined when I get fucked.
A long hot shower afterward as well.
