Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 11,585
- 8,686
- 2,138
I wouldn't be surprised if Epstein is still alive. I worked at a maximum security prison. The idea that cameras went offline and multiple federally trained officers fell asleep in the moments leading up to his death is so ridiculous it's almost insulting that they expect people to believe that.
Cameras going offline is very rare. Those things are built to last and they get preventative maintenance on a regular schedule so that doesn't happen. If they do happen to go offline (extremely rare), it is considered an emergency maintenance situation and people are on the way immediately to fix it. It's not something that would have gone unnoticed, especially when dealing with arguably the most notorious inmate in modern American history.
I am also supposed to believe the federal officers assigned to him were all sleeping, as if they wouldn't understand the gravity of the situation with an inmate like that? He likely would have been on constant supervision by the most reliable officers they had.
At some point, the coincidences stack so high that a coverup actually becomes the more plausible explanation. For me, Epstein’s case crossed that line easily.
1. Camera reliability - Maximum security prison cameras are extremely robust and closely monitored. A sudden, unexplained failure is extremely unusual.
2. Staff responsibility - Officers know the stakes with high-profile inmates. The idea that multiple trained officers would all fall asleep at the same time strains plausibility.
3. Patterns of coincidence - The perfect storm of camera failure plus sleeping officers, at a critical moment, is statistically improbable.
I'm not being paranoid; it’s an informed assessment based on what actually happens in maximum security settings. The system has checks and protocols that make the official story very hard to believe.
They are lying to us about something. Maybe he's not still alive, but at the very least I think he was killed and it was covered up.
Cameras going offline is very rare. Those things are built to last and they get preventative maintenance on a regular schedule so that doesn't happen. If they do happen to go offline (extremely rare), it is considered an emergency maintenance situation and people are on the way immediately to fix it. It's not something that would have gone unnoticed, especially when dealing with arguably the most notorious inmate in modern American history.
I am also supposed to believe the federal officers assigned to him were all sleeping, as if they wouldn't understand the gravity of the situation with an inmate like that? He likely would have been on constant supervision by the most reliable officers they had.
At some point, the coincidences stack so high that a coverup actually becomes the more plausible explanation. For me, Epstein’s case crossed that line easily.
1. Camera reliability - Maximum security prison cameras are extremely robust and closely monitored. A sudden, unexplained failure is extremely unusual.
2. Staff responsibility - Officers know the stakes with high-profile inmates. The idea that multiple trained officers would all fall asleep at the same time strains plausibility.
3. Patterns of coincidence - The perfect storm of camera failure plus sleeping officers, at a critical moment, is statistically improbable.
I'm not being paranoid; it’s an informed assessment based on what actually happens in maximum security settings. The system has checks and protocols that make the official story very hard to believe.
They are lying to us about something. Maybe he's not still alive, but at the very least I think he was killed and it was covered up.
Last edited: