Why I Am Resigning

[berg80]

What was the reward for, then?

John Kirby, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said the decision to raise the bounty on Mr. Maduro was part of “a concerted message of solidarity with the Venezuelan people,” meant “to further elevate international efforts to maintain pressure on Mr. Maduro and his representatives.”

Such rewards are widely considered more symbolic than a serious effort to effect an arrest. The $25 million bounty is an increase from a $15 million reward set by the Trump administration in 2020.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/world/americas/biden-bounty-nicolas-maduro.html

Did you complain when Obama was killing American citizens with drone strikes?

Even for the master of false equivalences that one was a doozy.

 

[Concerned American]

Even for the master of false equivalences that one was a doozy.

I agree--you are the master of false equivalencies. LOL, would the $25M had been paid by the Biden admin if some Venezuelan had taken him out? Biden had a $25M bounty on his head, regardless of your inept bbbbut, bbbbut, bbbbbut.

 

[Seymour Flops]

John Kirby, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said the decision to raise the bounty on Mr. Maduro was part of “a concerted message of solidarity with the Venezuelan people,” meant “to further elevate international efforts to maintain pressure on Mr. Maduro and his representatives.”

Such rewards are widely considered more symbolic than a serious effort to effect an arrest. The $25 million bounty is an increase from a $15 million reward set by the Trump administration in 2020.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/world/americas/biden-bounty-nicolas-maduro.html

New York Times trying to rewrite history to protect biden's legacy?

Wow! what's next? Will they try to protect hunter biden's art career?

Even for the master of false equivalences that one was a doozy.

So you approved of Obama's assassination of american citizens?

 

[BackAgain]

I protest this thread’s title.

It gives the deliberately false impression that the OP (“bug”) is quitting our Board.

Alas, it just an old and uninteresting story about a blowhard former judge.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

There is no “ outside their jurisdiction “ with FEDERAL judges

Pure nonsense

The US Congress via the Constitution CAN and DOES regulate the federal courts, INCLUDING determining the scope of their jurisdiction. Try studying the Constitution.

 

[BackAgain]

The US Congress via the Constitution CAN and DOES regulate the federal courts, INCLUDING determining the scope of their jurisdiction. Try studying the Constitution.

Good point.

Also, the Feseral Courts also have Constitutionally governed jurisdiction in some disputes (like a dispute between two separate States) or like a dispute between citizens of different States. Accordingly, assuming a dispute otherwise raises a justiciable issue, if that dispute is between two people of the same State, there is no Federal Jurisdiction.

There are many other examples.

Lucky, you are simply correct. As is so often the case, Letch is simply and flatly wrong.