Zone1 Why Don't We Execute Thugs More?? Like They Do In Other Countries

[Biff_Poindexter]

So Matt Walsh is one of those Conservatives who is competing with the Tucker Carlsons of the world to try to lean into to fascism to create more to get more of following among the right wing base....but he asks an interesting question....Singapore has an awesome looking airport; no doubt we could have nice airports too if we execute drug dealers, drug users and thieves more.


As Matt himself said, if we would simply beat a shoplifter until he or she bleeds, that will help improve our infrastructure...I mean let's put to the side a minute that Singapore's government is what built those fancy airports, but it is fun to pretend that we don't have fancy airports not because of conservatives years long crusade against infrastructure investment -- but instead, we just don't execute people enough.....fascism is fun.....

 

[Meister]

Why don't we execute thugs more??
That is a broad statement. Define thugs, and define the crime.
The punishment should fit the crime, no?

I would like punishment to fit the crime, and not just release the perps.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

So Matt Walsh is one of those Conservatives who is competing with the Tucker Carlsons of the world to try to lean into to fascism to create more to get more of following among the right wing base....but he asks an interesting question....Singapore has an awesome looking airport; no doubt we could have nice airports too if we execute drug dealers, drug users and thieves more.


As Matt himself said, if we would simply beat a shoplifter until he or she bleeds, that will help improve our infrastructure...I mean let's put to the side a minute that Singapore's government is what built those fancy airports, but it is fun to pretend that we don't have fancy airports not because of conservatives years long crusade against infrastructure investment -- but instead, we just don't execute people enough.....fascism is fun.....

Because if you execute all the murderers, child molestors and Rapists, soon there wont be a Democrat voter left.

 

[1srelluc]

IMHO three felonies and it's a bullet in the back of the head.

 

[Harry Dresden]

IMHO three felonies and it's a bullet in the back of the head.

after their second felony they should locked up for 50 years....dont give them a chance to do a third...

 

[1srelluc]

after their second felony they should locked up for 50 years....dont give them a chance to do a third...

50 X 25K average worth of upkeep a year = 1M out of taxpayer pockets.

Given that a two-time felon will reoffend within three years it's the Deal of the Day.....I'm a practical man.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

IMHO three felonies and it's a bullet in the back of the head.

The only problem is, the government can easily make anyone q felon

 

[1srelluc]

The only problem is, the government can easily make anyone q felon

Meh, I've managed to made it near 70 years without being charged with a felony.