Dylan Roof said he wanted a Race war and you guys are still like "I'm not sure what motivated him. Was it racism? Who knows!"
Roof is a racist. So is this guy. What's hard to understand about that? Racism knows no ideological boundaries. Now, the press may not get that, but it's true.
The part I dont understand is that the OP said something that isnt true and somehow all the conservatives saw it too but there isnt any links, evidence or proof of that thing happening.
I mean they are literally using the information they got from the press to say that the press wont say it. Why the urge to lie just to be outraged at the lie you created?
I suspect it is very similar to "hands up, don't shoot", which didn't happen, yet became a rallying cry for those who think it DOES happen far too often.
What do you mean hands up dont shoot didnt happen? The saying or the action?
It didn't happen in the case that made it a popular expression.
So what youre saying is that they are making it up?
I'm saying that they're expressing discontent over bias in the press. Now, in a few weeks it will be possible to compare the press coverage on this case to that of other cases and make a determination as to whether the press focused as much on the racial aspects as they did on cases where the killer was white and targeted black people.
It is not even controversial that the press displays a bias in what it reports and how it reports it. For example, the party affiliation of Republican officials caught in scandal is often prominently noted and time is spent wondering what will be the impact on the party, while that of democrats caught in like scandals are not prominently identified and the impact on the party is ignored.
Again, based on what? Feelings! Some more stories that dont have links, evidence or proof. You just say it and viola, its supposed to be true.
Well, except for these:
The press spent far more time on Cecil the lion than they did on the Planned Parenthood videos. Agree or disagree?
They routinely ignore hundreds of thousands of pro-life protestors who gather in DC every year on the anniversary of Roe. Agree or disagree?
They often demand that Republicans defend their positions on abortion and characterize any restriction as "extreme", yet do not even question democrat politicians about their party's platform stance, which is out of sync with most Americans. Agree or disagree?
They portray attempts to ensure only those eligible to vote are allowed to vote as racist, even though they apply to everyone, regardless of skin color. Agree or disagree?
They spent a great deal of time and effort exposing and castigating Christian bakers who don't want to get involved in a gay wedding, yet can't be bothered to seek out a Muslim owned bakery to get their perspective.
Do you disagree with any of those? If so, why?
Republicans are called upon by the press to distance themselves from those caught in scandal while democrats are not. Strong conservatives are labeled as "extreme" while equally strong liberals are labeled as "moderate". White assailants are prominently identified as such while black assailants are not, and on it goes.

Its the same old shit. Yes, when Dems get caught in scandals no one is asked to distance themselves
How? Cause this guy just said so
[/quote][/QUOTE]
When was the last time democrats were asked to denounce one of their own?