Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?

[RDD_1210]

i know, its real hard to push a button, let the magazine drop to the ground and slip in another.

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

Cuz then criminals won't have them!

Would certainly be harder. Seems to work in other countries just fine.

 

[RDD_1210]

i know, its real hard to push a button, let the magazine drop to the ground and slip in another.

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

Funny... I never saw that mentioned in the 2A. It said the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed... Last I checked, restricting is infringing.

What about the part of "well regulated" that you left out?

 

[RDD_1210]

I was considering that the other day. It's almost too perfect.

If I thought this Administration could do anything more complicated than picking their own noses without royally ******* it up, I'd almost consider the possibility that it was a conspiracy.

Just the fact that you would even entertain this idea is proof enough that you are neither stable or mature enough to possess a deadly weapon.

The fact that people like you are in government is precisely why the Founders enumerated the right to keep and bear firearms.

Now I'm in government?? I keep learning all sorts of things about myself in this thread.

 

[tjvh]

No one needs a 30 round magazine.

I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a musket, nothing more.

Using your logic then nothing created since the founding is covered by the Constitution. You know things like cell phones and privacy, Dumb ass.

Zzzzzzzzzz. When was the last time someone went on a killing spree using privacy.

****, you idiots are literally lemmings. My argument is perfect but its sure as shit way more sound than these so-called rebuttals you brainiacs are so proud of.

Another angry liberal who is upset we all don't jump in line and allow those who know best to usurp our Freedoms... And you call us idiots.

 

[Charles_Main]

Because nobody but a highly-trained soldier can possibly swap out a magazine in under ten minutes.

True story.

i know, its real hard to push a button, let the magazine drop to the ground and slip in another.

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

The Point of our right to bear arms is to protect us from the Government. If we can not have simple, Semi Auto Refiles, what the hell is the point?

 

[tjvh]

Just the fact that you would even entertain this idea is proof enough that you are neither stable or mature enough to possess a deadly weapon.

The fact that people like you are in government is precisely why the Founders enumerated the right to keep and bear firearms.

Now I'm in government?? I keep learning all sorts of things about myself in this thread.

You knew you were a subject long before this thread came along.

 

[RDD_1210]

i know, its real hard to push a button, let the magazine drop to the ground and slip in another.

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

If i had a sword or a machete I could kill as many kids in a school as this guy did with semi automatic before i was stopped. don't kid yourself.

False, but thanks for trying.

 

[Spoonman]

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

Funny... I never saw that mentioned in the 2A. It said the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed... Last I checked, restricting is infringing.

What about the part of "well regulated" that you left out?

self regulated, not by the governemnt

 

[Crackerjack]

Just the fact that you would even entertain this idea is proof enough that you are neither stable or mature enough to possess a deadly weapon.

The fact that people like you are in government is precisely why the Founders enumerated the right to keep and bear firearms.

Now I'm in government?? I keep learning all sorts of things about myself in this thread.

"People like you" is what I wrote.

You sure do a convincing job of playing dumb.

 

[Spoonman]

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

If i had a sword or a machete I could kill as many kids in a school as this guy did with semi automatic before i was stopped. don't kid yourself.

False, but thanks for trying.

yea right, i'd like to see you try to stop me. and if it is so false why did it work so well in rwanda when their government banned guns? Try again

 

[Spoonman]

The number of guns in the USA is growing by about 20 million a year but the number of homicides by guns is dropping. Why is that?

 

[RDD_1210]

i know, its real hard to push a button, let the magazine drop to the ground and slip in another.

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

The Point of our right to bear arms is to protect us from the Government. If we can not have simple, Semi Auto Refiles, what the hell is the point?

So the kids in school being shot is the price that needs to be paid so that you can protect yourself against the government possibly one day "taking over".

The fantasy world you loons live in is amazing. I guess when you don't understand the difference between communism and socialism and think our own president is a muslim and enemy of the country you would live in a fantasy world that this scenario above is somehow justification for killing innocent children.

 

[Charles_Main]

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

Funny... I never saw that mentioned in the 2A. It said the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed... Last I checked, restricting is infringing.

What about the part of "well regulated" that you left out?

The Well Regulated Militia line has nothing to do with our right to bear arms. Learn your history. That provision was meant to keep Militia's in line. In that day It was common for states, or even other groups with in states, to form Militia's. The founders wanted those Militia's Regulated because they did not want some militia trying to set up their own country out west.

Learn what a comma is man, it does not mean we can only have guns as part of a Militia.

But even if you were right, Your Federal Government took away our Regulated Militia's in the last century, when they Nationalized all the State Nation Guards, Taking control of them away from the States, and allowing the Federal Government to call them up at will.

 

[LibertyLemming]

Using your logic then nothing created since the founding is covered by the Constitution. You know things like cell phones and privacy, Dumb ass.

Zzzzzzzzzz. When was the last time someone went on a killing spree using privacy.

****, you idiots are literally lemmings. My argument is perfect but its sure as shit way more sound than these so-called rebuttals you brainiacs are so proud of.

Another angry liberal who is upset we all don't jump in line and allow those who know best to usurp our Freedoms... And you call us idiots.

It is funny because when this law was written, part of the intent was to be able to form a group of people to defend themselves or the nation, and perhaps to even protect themselves from a possible tyrannical government within our geographic area. Now, at the time the law was written, the military of big governments and the average citizen were basically on the same level as far as weaponry goes. Musket was pretty much it and it was accessible to those in power and those citizens without a title. Level playing field. Many democratic type revolutions occur throughout the world.

Now, the people in power clearly have the upper-hand in weaponry and clearly there is massive amounts of natural rights being violated across the globe. Maybe I will need a 30 round clip someday? Can you assure me 100% that I will NEVER be in a situation where a 30 round clip wouldn't save my life? No you can't. Everyone has a right to be free and to retain their property and that is a right that comes from being human, not from your government. All government does is restrict liberty, it does not give liberty. Don't forget it.

 

[RDD_1210]

Funny... I never saw that mentioned in the 2A. It said the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed... Last I checked, restricting is infringing.

What about the part of "well regulated" that you left out?

self regulated, not by the governemnt

LOL, doesn't say that. lol "self regulated".

 

[Spoonman]

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

The Point of our right to bear arms is to protect us from the Government. If we can not have simple, Semi Auto Refiles, what the hell is the point?

So the kids in school being shot is the price that needs to be paid so that you can protect yourself against the government possibly one day "taking over".

The fantasy world you loons live in is amazing. I guess when you don't understand the difference between communism and socialism and think our own president is a muslim and enemy of the country you would live in a fantasy world that this scenario above is somehow justification for killing innocent children.

yea and peopel being killed by drunk drivers are the price to pay for the convenience of driving. which by the way isn't even a constitutional right.

 

[Charles_Main]

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

The Point of our right to bear arms is to protect us from the Government. If we can not have simple, Semi Auto Refiles, what the hell is the point?

So the kids in school being shot is the price that needs to be paid so that you can protect yourself against the government possibly one day "taking over".

The fantasy world you loons live in is amazing. I guess when you don't understand the difference between communism and socialism and think our own president is a muslim and enemy of the country you would live in a fantasy world that this scenario above is somehow justification for killing innocent children.

Shot the **** up asshole. I have never called Obama a Communist, or a Muslim.

You simply do not understand our Constitution, or what has assured we remain free for all this time.

You are ready to punish anyone who owns a gun, simply cause a tiny Minority of assholes use them to commit evil acts.

 

[Spoonman]

What about the part of "well regulated" that you left out?

self regulated, not by the governemnt

LOL, doesn't say that. lol "self regulated".

got a link to where is says regulated by the government? i didn't think so. try again

 

[Crackerjack]

Right. Exactly why semi-automatic weapons should be restricted.

The Point of our right to bear arms is to protect us from the Government. If we can not have simple, Semi Auto Refiles, what the hell is the point?

So the kids in school being shot is the price that needs to be paid so that you can protect yourself against the government possibly one day "taking over".

The fantasy world you loons live in is amazing. I guess when you don't understand the difference between communism and socialism and think our own president is a muslim and enemy of the country you would live in a fantasy world that this scenario above is somehow justification for killing innocent children.

Nobody is justifying killing innocent children, you lying sack of horseshit.

 

[RDD_1210]

If i had a sword or a machete I could kill as many kids in a school as this guy did with semi automatic before i was stopped. don't kid yourself.

False, but thanks for trying.

yea right, i'd like to see you try to stop me. and if it is so false why did it work so well in rwanda when their government banned guns? Try again

You wouldn't do shit and we both know it. You're all talk and I'd be surprised if your fat ass could lift asword and move at the same time let alone kill multiple moving targets with it.

The ******* fantasy world you all are in must be amazing where you're all rambo with ninja sword skills.