Your post is the kind of stupidity we need to be on guard against. With the exception of the Civil War and Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus, martial law has been a rarity in this nation and has been localized on a state, and usually, a city level.I have no need to waste my time talking to a brainwashed idiot, who gets refuted 100%, and then comes back asking to be refuted again. Not my problem.No he cannot. He has no such authority.
He lost and that is fact. Your claim it was tolen is a baseless accusaqtion with no evidence hwich means you are a liar. You are bearing false witness.
Go back to school, and read your history book, ignoramus. Read about the 1844 Congressional declaration of Andrew Jackson's fine being invalid, and his declaration of martial law being valid. And the 63 other cases. You know nothing.
For example, Before Hawaii was a state, there was martial law imposed after Pearl Harbor, to much controversy.
Martial law in the United States - Wikipedia
We can not normalize talk of martial law as though it is routine in this country. It is not.
Nothing in our history would indicate that it is in anyway normal for a president of the United States to declare martial law, nationwide or in parts of the country, because he lost an election.
They only do that in third world shitholes.
Last edited: