Why do some Trump voters fear losing their jobs?

[Questioner]

Questioner is obviously a brainwashed lib. Don't bother responding to the fool.

This is an economic argument, not a liberal or conservative one.

The manufacturing jobs angle is a protectionist argument.

Tech sector jobs are where the real demographic replacement is happening. A new racist paradigm in the making.

Whats wrong with the old one?

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

As far a jobs and labor goes, I tend to be capitalist and favor innovation in the workplace, I believe on some level that individuals who fear "losing their jobs" are often unable to innovate, adapt and add more value to their workplace, settling instead for boring, repetitive work or labor which is easily automated, regardless of industry (whether a job at a grocery store or a "technical" job, such as translation work, a so-called "corporate" job, or otherwise).

In spite of mythos of "puritanical" work ethic, and archaic ideas such as "working hours" being a measure of productivity, I view most workers as lazy and immoral, unconcerned with adding any value to their company, so much as only putting in the bare minimum required effort hoping for something in return.

Despite the romance of "Puritan" work ethic, the average member of Puritan England, was not likely a John Buyan, but rather an average man or woman, with much of the same lazy or immoral behavior as we see in the so called "working class" today, or the average sycophant of the wealthy, given that an actual "hard and intelligent" worker would be too busy so settle for sycophantly.

If some workers lose their jobs, "Trump supporters" or otherwise, this may be in part because they deserved it, or are replaced by more earnest individuals.

I say this as a failed entrepreneur and published author - most of what many degenerate Americans call "work" is so easy that a more intelligent individual could do it in their sleep - the "torture" is due to the self-induced boredom and moral apathy, not due to any "back breaking labor" like we might have heard of in North Korea, or the days of slavery.

If may of these selfish degenerates kept their penis in their pants, and didn't have unplanned children which they can't support on their meager income, they wouldn't be in the situation they are today, the poverty trap is in part their own creation, and a result of their debauched and materialistic lifestyles. Self-discipline being a foreign notion to them.

Getting back to your retarded disingenuous query.....
What it amounts to is; Republicans are smart enough to know that a smaller underclass means higher wages all across the board, a more prosperous middle class, better, more affordable healthcare, lower taxes, lower crime rates...etc etc
The Mexicrat Party needs all the filthy humans they can find in order to stay relevant.

So you say. I'm not bored enough to address that.

The best "healthcare for starters" would be not being an obese, disgusting, bag of farts.

Typical, when we can't support a corrupt system we demean the citizenry.

Ranking 37th — Measuring the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0910064


World Health Organization’s Ranking of the World’s Health Systems
Some people fancy all health care debates to be a case of Canadian Health Care vs. American. Not so. According to the World Health Organization’s ranking of the world’s health systems, neither Canada nor the USA ranks in the top 25.

Improving the Canadian Healthcare System does not mean we must emulate the American system, but it may mean that perhaps we can learn from countries that rank better than both Canada and the USA at keeping their citizens healthy.
World Health Organization's Ranking of the World's Health Systems


U.S. Health Care Ranked Worst in the Developed World
The U.S. health care system has been subject to heated debate over the past decade, but one thing that has remained consistent is the level of performance, which has been ranked as the worst among industrialized nations for the fifth time, according to the 2014 Commonwealth Fund survey 2014. The U.K. ranked best with Switzerland following a close second.

The Commonwealth Fund report compares the U.S. with 10 other nations: France, Australia, Germany, Canada, Sweden, New Zealand, Norway, the Netherlands, Switzerland and the U.K. were all judged to be superior based on various factors. These include quality of care, access to doctors and equity throughout the country. Results of the study rely on data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the World Health Organization and interviews from physicians and patients.
U.S. Health Care Ranked Worst in the Developed World


HOW BAD IS U.S. HEALTH CARE? AMONG HIGH-INCOME NATIONS, IT’S THE WORST, STUDY SAYS
As Republicans struggle to agree on a replacement for the Affordable Care Act, the Commonwealth Fund has rated the U.S. health care system as the worst among the 11 developed nations it analyzed as part of an evaluation conducted every three years. The think tank also rated the U.S. health care system as the worst-performing of the nations analyzed when the last evaluation was released in 2014.
The U.S. health care system has been rated the worst (by far) among high-income nations


How does the quality of the U.S. healthcare system compare to other countries?
Bench-marking U.S. quality measures against those of similarly large and wealthy countries is one way to assess how successful the U.S. has been at improving care for its population, and to learn from systems that often produce better outcomes. The OECD has compiled data on dozens of outcomes and process measures. Across a number of these measures, the U.S. lags behind similarly wealthy OECD countries (those that are similarly large and wealthy based on GDP and GDP per capita).In some cases, such as the rates of all-cause mortality, premature death, death amenable to healthcare, and disease burden, the U.S. is also not improving as quickly as other countries, which means the gap is growing.
https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/quality-u-s-healthcare-system-compare-countries/#item-start

All progressive sites. Expect them to be honest? I have a bridge to sell ya...

I have no expectation of you being honest.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

This is an economic argument, not a liberal or conservative one.

The manufacturing jobs angle is a protectionist argument.

Tech sector jobs are where the real demographic replacement is happening. A new racist paradigm in the making.

Whats wrong with the old one?

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

 

[Questioner]

Is that you, pknopp, or perhaps Bo Didley...

Whether concentrated wealth authoritarians choose to call themselves capitalists, socialists or communists is moot and utterly irrelevant.

If I was dictator for a day, I'd eliminate the popular vote, and allow elections to be decided solely by the 1% or the entrepreneurial class (celebrities would be excluded, of course).

I'd also be very tempted to ban all forms of mass media, TV, radio, social media, and otherwise. It's the opiate of the illiterate.

If you were dictator, there wouldn't be a vote.

That's kind of the point in declaring oneself a dictator.

As far as the American Founders go, they were well-educated, ambitious "elites", and never would have thought much of the ignorance, immorality, or child molesting tendencies or the average, media-addicted American, given that "mass media" often serves a similar purpose as "Priesthood" does, to those addicted to it.

"ignorance, immorality, or child molesting tendencies or the average, media-addicted American, given that "mass media" often serves a similar purpose as "Priesthood" does, to those addicted to it."

Wow...you described the Left perfectly...good job

I'm not denying that one. I could care less about the so-called "left".

Many of them are moral degenerates who seek only to destroy rather than build up, no one's denying that.

 

[impuretrash]

Questioner is obviously a brainwashed lib. Don't bother responding to the fool.

This is an economic argument, not a liberal or conservative one.

The manufacturing jobs angle is a protectionist argument.

Tech sector jobs are where the real demographic replacement is happening. A new racist paradigm in the making.

Whats wrong with the old one?

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

And now they'll go even further to the bottom thanks to mass immigration of a higher IQ demographic.

 

[Questioner]

Tech sector jobs are where the real demographic replacement is happening. A new racist paradigm in the making.

Whats wrong with the old one?

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Whether concentrated wealth authoritarians choose to call themselves capitalists, socialists or communists is moot and utterly irrelevant.

If I was dictator for a day, I'd eliminate the popular vote, and allow elections to be decided solely by the 1% or the entrepreneurial class (celebrities would be excluded, of course).

I'd also be very tempted to ban all forms of mass media, TV, radio, social media, and otherwise. It's the opiate of the illiterate.

If you were dictator, there wouldn't be a vote.

That's kind of the point in declaring oneself a dictator.

As far as the American Founders go, they were well-educated, ambitious "elites", and never would have thought much of the ignorance, immorality, or child molesting tendencies or the average, media-addicted American, given that "mass media" often serves a similar purpose as "Priesthood" does, to those addicted to it.

"ignorance, immorality, or child molesting tendencies or the average, media-addicted American, given that "mass media" often serves a similar purpose as "Priesthood" does, to those addicted to it."

Wow...you described the Left perfectly...good job

I'm not denying that one. I could care less about the so-called "left".

Many of them are moral degenerates who seek only to destroy rather than build up, no one's denying that.

Well perhaps that's how they feel about you, there ya go. Partisanshitheads gonna partisanshithead.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Whats wrong with the old one?

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

What did it mean when you said it about India?

 

[Questioner]

Very few of the radical left will start abolishing all public property by throwing out their computer and other 1st world luxuries, including science.

 

[Questioner]

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

What did it mean when you said it about India?

I never said anything about India.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Whats wrong with the old one?

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

If you want to deny Asians from a caste system india their successes then go do that somewhere else.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

What did it mean when you said it about India?

I never said anything about India.

We can all see what you said:

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

 

[impuretrash]

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

What did it mean when you said it about India?

I never said anything about India.

We can all see what you said:

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

I said that

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

What did it mean when you said it about India?

I never said anything about India.

We can all see what you said:

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

I said that

Brilliant.

 

[depotoo]

Questioner is obviously a brainwashed lib. Don't bother responding to the fool.

This is an economic argument, not a liberal or conservative one.

The manufacturing jobs angle is a protectionist argument.

Tech sector jobs are where the real demographic replacement is happening. A new racist paradigm in the making.

Whats wrong with the old one?

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

We never gave a fuck about blacks, they are the bottom of our caste system.

What a disgusting racist you are. At least you don’t hide it.

 

[Questioner]

There are successful black individuals, if you want to deny them merit on the basis of race arguments, then please piss off. Same with women.

Love it when folks are backed up into a corner and have to assign views to me.

You argued that "blacks" are at the bottom of the caste system. What's that supposed to mean?

If you want to deny blacks their success on the basis of race, then go do that somewhere else.

What did it mean when you said it about India?

I never said anything about India.

We can all see what you said:

Immigrating millions of Asians from caste system india for tech jobs does literally nothing to improve the economic outlook for black Americans.

That was a different guy. Probably "Broke Loser".

 

[OKTexas]

As far a jobs and labor goes, I tend to be capitalist and favor innovation in the workplace, I believe on some level that individuals who fear "losing their jobs" are often unable to innovate, adapt and add more value to their workplace, settling instead for boring, repetitive work or labor which is easily automated, regardless of industry (whether a job at a grocery store or a "technical" job, such as translation work).

In spite of mythos of "puritanical" work ethic, and archaic ideas such as "working hours" being a measure of productivity, I view most workers as lazy and immoral, unconcerned with adding any value to their company, so much as only putting in the bare minimum required effort hoping for something in return.

Despite the romance of "Puritan" work ethic, the average member of Puritan England, was not likely a John Buyan, but rather an average man or woman, with much of the same lazy or immoral behavior as we see in the so called "working class" today, or the average sycophant of the wealthy, given that an actual "hard and intelligent" worker would be too busy so settle for sycophantly.

If some workers lose their jobs, "Trump supporters" or otherwise, this may be in part because they deserved it.

I'm certain you have a link to back up your claim...OR was this pulled from your ass?
Why do some Trump voters fear losing their jobs?

This is one of the major campaign selling points which Trump is known for if you haven't been living in a cave.

If wastrels who are too lazy or unambitious to pursue any line of work other than pushing shopping carts or waiting tables lose their jobs to foreigners, that's just capitalism, and perhaps a bit of Darwinism in action.

They'll eventually drift into outright communism, and start to believe that they're "entitled" to jobs by the virtue of being "white" or something, at the expense of more qualified others.

Evidently you're the one living in a cave, you've perfectly described the commiecrats, not republicans.

.

 

[bodecea]

As far a jobs and labor goes, I tend to be capitalist and favor innovation in the workplace, I believe on some level that individuals who fear "losing their jobs" are often unable to innovate, adapt and add more value to their workplace, settling instead for boring, repetitive work or labor which is easily automated, regardless of industry (whether a job at a grocery store or a "technical" job, such as translation work).

In spite of mythos of "puritanical" work ethic, and archaic ideas such as "working hours" being a measure of productivity, I view most workers as lazy and immoral, unconcerned with adding any value to their company, so much as only putting in the bare minimum required effort hoping for something in return.

Despite the romance of "Puritan" work ethic, the average member of Puritan England, was not likely a John Buyan, but rather an average man or woman, with much of the same lazy or immoral behavior as we see in the so called "working class" today, or the average sycophant of the wealthy, given that an actual "hard and intelligent" worker would be too busy so settle for sycophantly.

If some workers lose their jobs, "Trump supporters" or otherwise, this may be in part because they deserved it.

I'm certain you have a link to back up your claim...OR was this pulled from your ass?
Why do some Trump voters fear losing their jobs?

This is one of the major campaign selling points which Trump is known for if you haven't been living in a cave.

If wastrels who are too lazy or unambitious to pursue any line of work other than pushing shopping carts or waiting tables lose their jobs to foreigners, that's just capitalism, and perhaps a bit of Darwinism in action.

So Trump runs on bringing factory / manufacturing jobs back to the US and closing our border down and you morph that into "Trump voters fear losing their jobs"?
Am I understanding you correctly?

What factory/manufacturing jobs have come back to the US?

 

[Questioner]

As far a jobs and labor goes, I tend to be capitalist and favor innovation in the workplace, I believe on some level that individuals who fear "losing their jobs" are often unable to innovate, adapt and add more value to their workplace, settling instead for boring, repetitive work or labor which is easily automated, regardless of industry (whether a job at a grocery store or a "technical" job, such as translation work).

In spite of mythos of "puritanical" work ethic, and archaic ideas such as "working hours" being a measure of productivity, I view most workers as lazy and immoral, unconcerned with adding any value to their company, so much as only putting in the bare minimum required effort hoping for something in return.

Despite the romance of "Puritan" work ethic, the average member of Puritan England, was not likely a John Buyan, but rather an average man or woman, with much of the same lazy or immoral behavior as we see in the so called "working class" today, or the average sycophant of the wealthy, given that an actual "hard and intelligent" worker would be too busy so settle for sycophantly.

If some workers lose their jobs, "Trump supporters" or otherwise, this may be in part because they deserved it.

I'm certain you have a link to back up your claim...OR was this pulled from your ass?
Why do some Trump voters fear losing their jobs?

This is one of the major campaign selling points which Trump is known for if you haven't been living in a cave.

If wastrels who are too lazy or unambitious to pursue any line of work other than pushing shopping carts or waiting tables lose their jobs to foreigners, that's just capitalism, and perhaps a bit of Darwinism in action.

They'll eventually drift into outright communism, and start to believe that they're "entitled" to jobs by the virtue of being "white" or something, at the expense of more qualified others.

Evidently you're the one living in a cave, you've perfectly described the commiecrats, not republicans.

.

Most workers are lazy and immoral, regardless of what party they pretend to vote for.

"Back breaking labor" doesn't exist in America, people's main source of job dissatisfaction is boredom due to lack of effort and ambition - I'm one of the few exceptions, as a failed entrepreneur - most people aren't and could care less.

"Hard work" is a lie and has always been - most idiots don't even know the difference between "hard" as in bumbling and incompetent's, versus hard in the sense of being challenging, mentally or otherwise, as well as ambitious, like actual entrepreneurs do.

The work is "hard" for most lazy Americans because they're selfish and immoral, and can't bother themselves to care about their work ethic to begin with.

 

[JGalt]

Link?

I don't have a link, but are you seriously denying that dissuading fear of losing jobs hasn't been one of the Trump campaign's major selling points?

Well we need jobs lol good jobs yes lol

I encountered one Trump supporter once complaining about jobs being lost to immigrants, he was a piece of trash who admitted to lying about having a college degree in order to attempt to find a better job, that's how much a lot of them actually give a damn about the value of honest labor.

I'm a failed entrepreur who spend time on my entrepreneurship while working jobs which were so easy I could do them in my sleep. I took the risk of failing as an entrepreur and did, so I don't give much about vermin who could really care less about the American dream, and want the government to stop them from being replaced by immigrants who are more capable of actual work than they are.

There are tens of millions of people with worthless degrees. Logic tell me many are Progs.

If the educated are your enemy that's illogical.

If you were so damned "educated", you wouldn't be such a dupe, a tool, and and a "useful idiot" for for your lying-assed America-hating party and media. You might actually try thinking for yourself, and realizing what a great President we have in Donald Trump.

I'm just sayin' here, hillbilly.