Skylar, don't waste your breath. Everyone can see the windows being blown out when Tower 7 collapsed.
One small problem, Socrates:
What you claim were 'explosives' appeared AFTER the building had already begun to fall. While in actual controlled demolition, the explosives fire BEFORE the building begins to fall. See, cause precedes effect.
In your awful, awful explanation, cause follows effect. Which isn't how it works, is it?
So what can you do when your explanation breaks? Why show us 'new WTC 7 footage' where the 'explosions' appear before the collapse, of course. '
New footage' that you know was a hoax, that you know had been fraudulently created.
If your claims had merit, you wouldn't have to use faked evidence to support it. Though I am curious....where your faked footage play in your conception of 'epistemology'?
I never claimed anything about sides. If you actually bother watching all of the videos of Tower 7 collapsing you will see the windows were blown out on both sides at the same time. I am not interested in conversing about this with you, because you blindly believe something that contradicts the evidence, in favor of 'spin propaganda'.
You claimed the fake footage matched other views.
In reality, your faked footage is exactly opposite of the other views. With the 'explosions' on the opposite side of the other footage. With the 'explosions' coming before the collapse in the faked footage. And what you call 'explosives' appearing AFTER the collapse had initiated in the other views.
And of course, actual explosions are ridiculously, deafeningly loud. Where the WTC 7 collapse began in virtual silence. Worse still, the building was on fire. And no system of explosives works while on fire. Explosives would have exploded, detonators detonated, receivers reduced to bubbling pools of plastic. And of course there were no girders cut in a manner consistent with explosive demolition. Despite your theory requiring thousands of them.
So fire proof, silent explosives that don't actually cut girders? Laughing.........the Truther conspiracy is just stupid.
That the fire department expected a collapse does not prove anything.
Blithering nonsense. Its direct evidence contradicting your batshit conspiracy. The FDNY watched as the building burned. They put a transit on the building and over the course of hours measured its leaning. Its buckling. Its slow structural failure.
And the FDNY determined that the building was going to collapse due to *structural failure*. And correctly estimated its collapse to within about an hour.
No explosives required.
But you ignore the FDNY and make up a stupidly elaborate, batshit conspiracy witnessed by *no one*, backed by nothing, where
somehow in a building engulfed in flame, fireproof ninjas (apparently, as no one saw them and they didn't burn up) snuck past the containment line of the FDNY and into the building and wired to explode with SILENT explosives (a physical impossibility, FYI) that didn't cut a single girder and left no explosive residue in any dust sample.....where the fireproof ninjas then snuck out and past the FDNY yet again.
Laughing....that's fucking stupid. Its fact free, wildly complicated, pointlessly elaborate, and contradicted by overwhelming evidence. While the building collapsing due to structural failure because of the fire matches the assessment of the FDNY on the scene and the NIST investigation after.
Occam's Razor, my friend. It cuts your hapless conspiracy batshit to ribbons.
